$17 to see a 3D movie?

i never heard of vip seating at a theater - that's pretty lame though

^^coming to a theatre near you. Believe me.

in chicago we had a luxury theater that served steaks and wine n shit with nice tables n whatnot. was kinda dope for a date. $25 a ticket.

espn is broadcasting the world cup in 3d...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WUnded Fox

well considering the 3D tvs are already on the shelves...
i'd say 3D is here to stay just as much as HD is.

Nintendo is bout to drop a 3D DS handheld too.

personally i think 3D is dope and can only get better.

lol @ check hating flat brims but loving flat movies.

---

Well on another side note, I don't have a flat screen tv. ha ha

Yea they have vip seats here but I dont think the actual CHAIRS are any better lol you just reserve seats for extra DOUGH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kenny Powers

espn is broadcasting the world cup in 3d...

---

one of my concubines works for cnn nascar, weird for a black chick right?, anyway she said they are gonna brodcast nascar in 3D next season.

It sounds like it will be like Final Destination 4. Black chicks dig rednecks.

A lot of people are saying that the 3D version of Clash of the Titans sucks. lol

Critics are mixed about the value of the updated "Clash of the Titans" as a film. But they overwhelmingly agree about the value of its 3D effects. In a word: Lousy.

The LA Times notes: "It's doubtful that records are kept about this sort of thing, but consider the possibility that 'Clash of the Titans' is the first film to actually be made worse by being in 3D."

Joe Morgenstern of The Wall Street Journal adds, "A few more 3D spectacles like 'Clash of the Titans' and audiences will be clamoring for 2D."

dude the trailor alone made my my penis cower in fear. it looked awesome as fuck I cant imagine what an experience it is in 3d. lex lugor demands a source for that jargon you just posted!

One of the reasons they are saying the 3D version sucks is cause the movie was made to be only in 2D.. but then since movies like Avatar did well, they converted it to 3D later on, but it didn't convert well. The 2D version is said to be good though.

james cameron was asked if he would ever make another 2D flick:
"why would i do that?"

There is more to a movie than just effects.

well its kinda like why would you make an 8 bit game when you could make some shit like Mass Effect

check two spent $3500 trying to beat Gauntlet II in the arcade.