Biden is the obvious choice for assisted living

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by b-dolo

Trump paying 70k a year for a hairdresser. The jokes just write themself with this clown.

https://www.glamour.com/story/aoc-sp...ans-criticized

Why don't he just shave it off? Plenty men look dignified bald, it would be better then what he does now.

---

LOL $70K on hair is a lot of money in one year. I spend $10 on a haircut or cut it myself.

I mean, Michelle Obama's hairstylist probably made $70,000 a year doing her hair almost daily.

But why can't a guy just comb it himself? I guess perfecting the comb over is a lot of work.

Imagine how much he spends on the spray tans and tanning beds. Probably even more than that. LOL

I never quite understood Trump's fake tans. I'd never get one. It reminds me of Jersey Shore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by b-dolo

Trump paying 70k a year for a hairdresser. The jokes just write themself with this clown.

https://www.glamour.com/story/aoc-sp...ans-criticized

Why don't he just shave it off? Plenty men look dignified bald, it would be better then what he does now.

---

Is it out of the norm, though?

List of Michelle Obama's Staff
Here is a list of Michelle Obama's staff and their salaries in 2010. To see the annual salaries of other top U.S. government officials go here. https://www.thoughtco.com/top-us-gov...laries-3321465


Natalie F. Bookey Baker, executive assistant to the chief of staff to the first lady, $45,000;
Alan O. Fitts, deputy director of advance and trip director for the first lady, $61,200;
Jocelyn C. Frey, deputy assistant to the president and director of policy and projects for the first lady, $140,000;
Jennifer Goodman, deputy director of scheduling and events coordinator for the first lady, $63,240;
Deilia A.L. Jackson, deputy associate director of correspondence for the first lady, $42,000;
Kristen E. Jarvis, special assistant for scheduling and traveling aide to the first lady, $51,000;
Camille Y. Johnston, special assistant to the president and director of communications for the first lady, $102,000;
Tyler A. Lechtenberg, director of correspondence for the first lady, $50,000;
Catherine M. Lelyveld, director and press secretary to the first lady, $85,680;
Dana M. Lewis, special assistant and personal aide to the first lady, $66,000;
Trooper Sanders, deputy director of policy and projects for the first lady, $85,000;
Susan S. Sher, assistant to the president and chief of staff and counsel to the first lady, $172,200;
Frances M. Starkey, director of scheduling and advance for the first lady, $80,000;
Semonti M. Stevens, associate director and deputy press secretary to the first lady, $53,550;
and Melissa Winter, special assistant to the president and deputy chief of staff to the first lady, $102,000.
Erinn J. Burnough, deputy director and deputy social secretary, $66,300;
Joseph B. Reinstein, deputy director and deputy social secretary, $66,300;
and Julianna S. Smoot, deputy assistant to the president and White House social secretary, $150,000.

Did Michelle Obama pay for all these assistants with her own money and write it off on her taxes? Or did the taxpayers have to foot the bills for all her "social secretaries" and "schedulers"? I don't know.

Quote:

---

Michelle Obama's staff consisted of 18 employees who got paid nearly $1.5 million in salary in 2010, according to the administration's Annual Report to Congress on White House Staff.

According to the June 2017 report to Congress on White House personnel, First Lady Melania Trump maintains a significantly smaller staff than her predecessor, Michelle Obama. As of June 2017, only four people were listed as working directly for First Lady Trump for a total combined annual salary of $486,700.

https://www.thoughtco.com/michelle-obamas-staff-3322113

---

What I don't get , everybody was saying Trump was a business man and not a politician.

https://truthout.org/articles/tax-re...cial-disaster/

It was common knowledge way before Trump got into politics that he had track record of being a failure as a entrepreneur. It was reported even before there would have been a media bias against him. He is a good con man, I will give him that, his con worked well enough to get him elected.

Well the communists blm antifa nutjobs have made their way back to Cleveland for the debate.

They did about 3.5 million in damage last time. National Guard is here this time. I guess At least the mayor isn’t antifa even if he is a corrupt democrat.

I don’t expect the same level of violence as last time but who knows.

Why shouldn't Biden wear an ear piece? Its not like he is going to be running the country if elected anyway. He will just be Peolsi/Schumer/Harris whipping boy. He is just most electable candidate to the mainstream. None of his ideas are his own, dude probably can't even pick his own clothes in the morning, let alone lead a country.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Seer

Baked Alaska is in full sperg mode, livestreaming outside the debate convention center. He's making the protesters lose their minds. This is pretty good afternoon entertainment.

---

Lol that’s funny. Can’t wait until the circus leaves town I’ll be down by the Clinic tomorrow afternoon.

In the final month before the election, we're probably going to get bombshell reports of scandals leaking against both candidates. Some over-hyped bullshit propaganda, some legitimately scandalous.

Disgusting footage shows Pennsylvania Democrats acknowledging face masks solely political
https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/sta...21597126467591

Quote:

---

A hot mic captured the moment a Pennsylvania House rep admitted to the state’s governor Tom Wolf that face masks are only being worn for the camera as “political theater.”

In video footage of the Tuesday press conference, Gov. Wolf can be overheard addressing Democrat District 143 Rep. Wendy Ullman off-camera, coordinating the move to take their masks off while they speak on the microphone.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by b-dolo

What I don't get , everybody was saying Trump was a business man and not a politician.

https://truthout.org/articles/tax-re...cial-disaster/

It was common knowledge way before Trump got into politics that he had track record of being a failure as a entrepreneur. It was reported even before there would have been a media bias against him. He is a good con man, I will give him that, his con worked well enough to get him elected.

---

80% of all businesses fail within the first 3 years.

Trump has over 500 businesses. You can name maybe 6 that failed via chapter 13, which is not nearly as bad as chapter 7.

That's a pretty good fucking batting average if you ask me.

Say it is true that Trump started with $1 million investment. He multiplied that by over 1000x.

Could you even double your money? If I gave you a million dollars, could you turn it into $2 million? I doubt it. Trump turned $1 million into $1 billion via hundreds of business enterprises.

I don't think he's as dumb as people like to think. And definitely not as dumb as Biden. If you had 500 businesses, would you do better than a 98.8% success rate? Or Biden? I doubt it.

Trumps broke. You proably got more money then him. He's got 400 million in loans coming up in next few years and no way to pay. He lost all of his daddy's money, then became a reality tv star and now has lost all that money. If you actual think he is multi millionaire you have been grifted hard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by b-dolo

Trumps broke. You proably got more money then him. He's got 400 million in loans coming up in next few years and no way to pay. He lost all of his daddy's money, then became a reality tv star and now has lost all that money. If you actual think he is multi millionaire you have been grifted hard.

---

Trumps financial status has no bearing on anything to me.
Lol I don’t know why people care.

Are people jealous or something? It’s weird especially when you say “daddy’s money”. It’s like it’s personal.

A lot of people are taking it very personal.

I have nothing against either of these men, I just know the Dems have embraced radical viewS and I’m in no way aligned with it.

Biden won’t even admit antifa’s existence. That’s troubling to me. Because he’s protecting them. Why protect them?

Trying to pin 3 months of left wing violence on “white supremecists” is laughable.


Biden defends the green new deal theN says he doesn’t support it. Lol.

I don’t know what the democrat position is at all. But I know it’s disingenuous.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dooch

Trumps financial status has no bearing on anything to me.
Lol I don’t know why people care.

Are people jealous or something? It’s weird especially when you say “daddy’s money”. It’s like it’s personal.

A lot of people are taking it very personal.

I have nothing against either of these men, I just know the Dems have embraced radical viewS and I’m in no way aligned with it.

Biden won’t even admit antifa’s existence. That’s troubling to me. Because he’s protecting them. Why protect them?

Trying to pin 3 months of left wing violence on “white supremecists” is laughable.


Biden defends the green new deal theN says he doesn’t support it. Lol.

I don’t know what the democrat position is at all. But I know it’s disingenuous.

---

You should care about his finances. If someone can't even manage their money, how they gonna handle running the country. Do you know how many military/goverment officials are denied clearance based on pass financial discrepancies? I say Daddy's money, just cause so many assume Donny is some sort of self made millionaire.

Overall how far has are country fallen if these two are best we can delivery. We dont need a tax fraud and a life long politician being the president. There should be an age cap on being president. Is this normal on other countries? Do they have old timers running things?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dooch

Biden won’t even admit antifa’s existence. That’s troubling to me. Because he’s protecting them. Why protect them?

Trying to pin 3 months of left wing violence on “white supremecists” is laughable.

---

this is the biggest problem at hand right now and Biden should have dealt with it over the last few months before discussing his future policy (Green deal or not etc). How irresponsible is a high up government official if he does not even TRY to get people to stop acting violently nor acknowledge the various groups that instigate the violence? You cannot simply handpick the violence and the violent protestors that suit you politically and expect there to be no consequences in the real world for everyday people. At this point nobody even knows how Biden will respond to these protests and eruptions of violence once he's in office. I think the people have the right to know and base their vote on that knowledge. Biden can't seriously think the violence and protests will magically disappear once he's in office. Large groups of protestors do not even have motives based on actual political beliefs, they just want mayhem. For them nothing will change when Biden's in office.

Where are this violent protests happening at currently? I am not trying to play dumb or anything, this is just a non issue where I live. I know of Portland,Seattle, Louisville and Chicago been problematic. But as of right now where is at. The mainstream media is probably not covering it.

I'm watching clips of the debate atm. It was broadcast here at 3 in the morning - even I'm asleep then lol. There's something to be said for the age cap b-dolo mentioned when you see Biden perform


on the other hand research like the one below just seems like a bunch of educated (?) guesses :

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...rs-health/amp/

SUPER AGERS?


In the end any man or woman can die in office no matter his or her age. the vice presidency is the right contingency plan for just such an occasion.

It would be an interesting thought experiment (though an uncomfortable real life situation) to see a candidate late into a high profile political race be diagnosed with a serious medical condition - and the info being leaked - and find out how it influences voters. Say if Hillary Clinton had been diagnosed with breast cancer during her campaign, how would the voters have responded? Positively or negatively? Hard to tell. And would someone with cancer or early signs of a kind of dementia have to be stopped from running for office, deep into the race? Idk if there are real examples of any such cases? None come to mind.


Back to the debate, Biden clearly did not come off well and did not have the stamina or fighting spirit to state his opinions or policy. All in all there wasn't that much to be heard on government policy and plans on both ends. I'd expected more real content in this debate but perhaps I'd gotten my hopes up too high.

Basically Trump has already won the election for the Republicans in the long run by getting Amy Cohen Barrett on the Supreme Court resulting in a current 6 to 3 advantage for conservatives. I thought maybe her view on the death penalty (she's opposed to it) would have hampered her nomination but in the end her views on abortion and euthanasia were thought to be of bigger consequence. I know 'officially' none of this comes into play for the nomibation but let's be real here, of course it does. At Cohen Barrett's age she's good for decades of conservative rulings so maybe, as I said, the Republicans have already won in the long run. The current elections are more on day to day policy and are still important in tharmt respect. Trump has used his time in office well in having judges appointed at the fastest pace possible, this often being overshadowed by day to day events, it has made him plot the course for the US for a long time to come even if Republicans do not hold the Presidency.

Getting Cohen Barrett on the Supreme Court has also ensured him of the Christian vote. Along with today's debate I think chances of Biden winning are slim. I don't see COVID or the violent protest disrupt this power balance in October.

Looking ahead to the NEXT election I wonder who the Republican party has set as young(ish) up and comers for the high profile offices. It looks like the Democrats have made more work of prepping a 'next generation' even though they had Sanders, Bloomberg and Biden have it out for this year's nomination. Back to the Republicans, will Mike Pence be prepped for running for President during Trump's second term? Pence seems to make sure not to steal any time or attention away from Trump, as a good VP probably should, but can he switch it up to give himself a presidential profile? I don't know about that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Seer

Wire for stealth ear piece or medication pump

https://twitter.com/Media__Ferret/st...67917636059144

---

'Captain America : Rise of the Superager Soldier'