-
NICAP's UFO Investigator/Selected NICAP Documents;
I have included links for" NICAPs UFO investigatory documents" as these docs are very important for a understanding how the military ect where perceiving the genuine cases of high strangeness UFO reports;The links to these documents need a bit of serious study to begin to perceive and understand the sheer scale of the different "waves" and "flaps" of UFO sightings and reports that occurred in the respective dates and years they occurred;
************************************************** ********
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++
NICAP's UFO Investigator and Selected NICAP Documents;
http://www.cufos.org/images/CUFOS2.jpg
quote;
"CUFOS acquired the files and other material of NICAP in the early 1980s as that organization was failing. We also have a complete collection of NICAP's UFO Investigator, the flagship publication of that organization. Altogether 162 issues were published, from July 1957 to June 1980. You can download each issue in a separate printable PDF file. In addition to the UFO Investigator, also available are the following publications released by NICAP: the Affiliate Newsletter, UFO Quarterly Review, Special "Confidential" Bulletins, "The Year of the UFO,
A Special Calendar of Historical Highlights", and finally over 300 select NICAP documents (jpg format) giving over 1600 pages in this collection. In these documents, you can read the original correspondence of T. Townsend Brown, Donald Keyhoe, as well as other NICAP staff, and some of the NICAP founding documents. These document NICAP's struggles and crises and finally NICAP's transfer to CUFOS. As an added bonus a complete copy of the very rare UFO's Secrecy Danger's & Evidence 1960 document sent to Congress is included.
As UFO researcher Brad Sparks has stated, "It's a massive collection of impossibly difficult-to-obtain internal NICAP documents and all of its outstanding publications, many of which remain unexplored because of their scarcity. This is a must-get collection if you want the inside story of UFOlogy from the beginning."
A very brief overview of NICAP is available on Wikipedia.here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...rial_Phenomena
"The single most influential UFO organization in history, NICAP, expired more than two decades ago. Now its remarkable background of publications and selected historical documents is once again available through the Center for UFO Studies, custodian of NICAP's archive, by way of a unique CD that opens the door back to those exciting days of military and congressional involvement in UFO research"
Barry Greenwood, Clear Intent "It's a massive collection of impossibly difficult-to-obtain internal NICAP documents and all of its outstanding publications, many of which remain unexplored because of their scarcity. This is a must-get collection if you want the inside story of UFOlogy from the beginning." Brad Sparks;
[To Parent Directory] here; http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:47 PM <dir> Affiliate Newsletter
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/A...%20Newsletter/
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:48 PM <dir> NICAP Selected Documents
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/N...d%20Documents/
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:59 PM 3590 Read Me.txt
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/Read%20Me.txt
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:59 PM 7680489 Special Bulletins.pdf
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/S...0Bulletins.pdf
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:59 PM 1155068 UFO Historical Calendar.pdf
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/U...20Calendar.pdf
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:49 PM <dir> UFO Quarterly Review
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/U...erly%20Review/
Sunday, April 24, 2011 5:56 PM <dir> UFO_Investigator
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/UFO_Investigator/
http://www.ufodocarchive.org/NICAP/
-
Nasatv Undock Ufo??
Did NASA TV record UFOs when filming a live docking aboard the ISS;Included below is the actual NASA TV recorded film feed of this incident along with Lan Fleming"s investigation summery based on scientific analysis;Was this just a case of after burners or ice particles or a case of a genuine unknown surveillance taking place from unknown object/objects during Shuttle-ISS mission;
*******************************
Nasatv Undock Ufo
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...tv_undock_ufo/
Space Shuttle Thrusters, Light Flashes, and Ice Particles
Some Insights from an Expert;
Lan Fleming;
Summary;
quote;
"In a discussion with a NASA aerospace engineer familiar with the space shuttle reaction control system, I learned that the thrusters never generate any light while operating, but they always emit a small cloud of unburned propellant just before the thruster fires and a much larger cloud immediately after the thruster shuts down. The post-burn cloud may be visible, but only when reflecting sunlight.
The pre-burn cloud is never visible to the human eye but might be detected by a light-sensitive camera. Any light flashes seen in space shuttle videos cannot be from a thruster unless they coincide with the beginning or end of a rocket burn. The consequences of this information in regard to two videos of apparently anomalous objects taken by shuttle video cameras are described".
Introduction;
As described in previous articles here and elsewhere, several objects in the STS-48 video of Sept. 15, 1991 seem to react to a flash of light by changing course. According to James Oberg and others associated with NASA, the flash of light was caused by the firing of a small reaction control system (RCS) thruster on the space shuttle. Oberg has asserted that:
The RCS jets usually fire in 80-millisecond pulses to keep the shuttle pointed in a desired direction, under autopilot control (usually once every few minutes). These jets may flash when they ignite if the mixture ratio is not quite right. Propellant also tends to seep out the feed lines into the nozzle, where it accumulates, freezes through evaporative cooling, and flakes off during the next firing. The ejected burn byproducts travel at about 1000 ft/sec. One pulse usually emits about a quarter pound of propellant in a fan-shaped plume.[1]
While I've written several articles pointing out flaws in the interpretation of the light flash in the STS-48 video as the product of a thruster firing, I had no reason to question the above description of thruster operation because Oberg had a long career as a flight officer in the Mission Control Center at Johnson Space Center, and frequently appears as an expert on spaceflight for TV news and on the lecture circuit. But it turns out his description is wrong or at least misleading on several important points.
I recently had the opportunity to discuss various aspects of the space shuttle's RCS propellant supply system with a NASA aerospace engineer who was involved in the design, testing, and performance evaluation of the RCS from the nearly the beginning of the shuttle program. Unlike Oberg, this engineer observed tests of thruster firings close up on a routine basis. Most of our discussions were related to work I am doing and was focused on the ingenious system that dependably supplies fuel and oxidizer to the rockets under weightless conditions in space as well under Earth's gravity during reentry. However, he also described what happens on the business end of an RCS thruster when it fires.
RCS Propellant Behavior Before, During, and After a Thruster Burn;
All of the space shuttle's rocket engines use the same "hypergolic" propellants, meaning two different chemical compounds that ignite on contact without the need of any ignition source such as an electrical spark. The fuel is monomethyl hydrazine (MMH) and the oxidizer is nitrogen tetroxide (NTO). This is fairly common knowledge and can be found on many web sites.[2]
The important fact about the RCS thrusters that I learned from the NASA engineer is that the two valves that simultaneously open to admit MMH and NTO into the rocket combustion chamber are not located immediately next to the combustion chamber walls. The valve mechanisms cannot withstand the intense heat generated by combustion (about 3500° Celsius). So the valves are mounted on a "thermal standoff" plate some distance from the combustion chamber and are connected to it by tubing, as shown in the diagram of a vernier RCS thruster[3] in Figure 1.
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image002.png
Figure 1: Diagram of a vernier reaction control thruster of the type alleged to have fired to cause object motions in the STS-48 video. The green regions indicate the "dribble volume," which is the section of tubing between either of the propellant valves and the combustion chamber.
When the thruster starts firing, the propellants are briefly exposed to the vacuum of space after flowing out of the opened valves until they reach the combustion chamber and ignite. While exposed to vacuum, some of the liquid propellants boils off into space and then immediately freezes into "microscopic snow," as this engineer called it. In the case of the small thrusters, this happens so quickly over the short distance from the valve to the combustion chamber (about 2 inches) that the amount of "snow" generated is too small to be seen.
When the valves are closed to shut the thruster down, small amounts of propellant are trapped in the tubes between the valves and the combustion chamber. The engineer called this volume of trapped propellant the "dribble volume," perhaps because it was observed to just dribble out of the thruster after shutoff during ground testing under atmospheric pressure. But in the vacuum of space, the "microscopic snow" also forms after shutoff just as it does at startup. But the dribble volume is large enough that the snow generated can be seen as a white plume in reflected sunlight. It is totally invisible without some external source of illumination.
The claim that significantly more unburned propellant is expelled at the end of a thruster burn than at the beginning appears to be supported by the telemetry records for the combustion chamber pressures of the Discovery's thrusters during the STS-48 mission, which I obtained from the NASA FOIA office.
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image004.png
Figure 2 shows a plot of the combustion chamber pressure versus time for the thruster burn proposed as the cause of the light flash in the STS-48 video. At the beginning of the burn, the pressure quickly rises from 0 (vacuum) to 110 psi, but after the thruster is shut off, the pressure stops its rapid decline and tails (or dribbles) off again to zero.
This tail region evidently is the pressure generated by the unburned liquid propellant trapped in the "dribble volume" evaporating into space. The record of STS-48 thruster firings I have is for a time period of 45 minutes with many burns recorded for all of the shuttle's vernier RCS thrusters, and every single one of them has the same steep rise at ignition and the same small "tail" after shutoff. Since it is a feature of every thruster firing, an associated emission of a visible plume of propellants is most likely to be present, too.
Figure 2: Plot of combustion chamber pressure versus time for the firing of the L5D vernier thruster proposed as the source of the light flash seen in the STS-48 video on Day 2, 21:28:19.5 Mission Elapsed Time.
The engineer likened the plume of small ice particles to the smoke that pours out of the barrel of a gun after the muzzle flash. Then he added "but there is no 'thruster' flash." Quite to the contrary of what might be construed from Oberg's assertion, there is no "flash" in the sense that the propellant itself generates little if any light at all during a burn. The unburned liquid propellant can be said "flash" to a vapor after thruster shutoff, but this refers only to the rapid phase change from liquid to gas, not to light emission. While Oberg may have been aware of this fact, his description was unclear about the meaning of the word "flash" and I doubt the meaning was apparent to many of his readers.
Mr. Oberg has asserted that:
It should also be pointed out that as all experienced observers of shuttle TV images realize, the visible flare of these jet firings is only an occasional and sporadic feature of their actual firings, which at other times -- especially in periods of smooth, stable propellant flow -- can be invisible.[4]
The evidence of the combustion chamber pressures indicates that there is nothing at all "sporadic" about this phenomenon. The numerous photos of shuttle thrusters emitting plumes provide more evidence that they are predictable result of a thruster shutoff. I have been puzzled for a long time about why the rocket combustion gases were so easy to see when they are supposed to be nearly invisible.
puzzle is apparently solved: these photos show jets of microscopic snow at the end of the firing cycle in reflected sunlight. In Figure 3, plumes from two primary RCS rockets on the left can clearly be seen.[5] The dull reddish glow on the right is apparently from an aft-firing primary thruster, making a total of three thrusters simultaneously emitting plumes of what must be unburned propellant – an unlikely coincidence if such emissions were sporadic rather than routine consequences of thruster firings.
Figure 3: Photograph showing plumes of unburned propellant emitted by three RCS thrusts simultaneously.
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image005.jpg
In the event that there is any instability during a thruster firing that causes the fuel-to-oxidizer ratio to be out of balance, the unburned propellant would be unlikely to form snow as it exits. According to one reference,[6] "Hydrazine ... is technically stable to about 250 C." At the 3500 C temperatures in an RCS combustion chamber, any excess MMH fuel would be converted to a gas, decompose into simpler component gases such as water and methane, and finally exit the thruster nozzle unseen along with the combustion products.
A blockage of propellant flow long enough to intermittently halt combustion and cause "snow" to be generated in mid-burn could be extremely dangerous, according to the NASA engineer. If the thruster were not shut down immediately, such a malfunction could potentially lead to an explosion and even loss of the vehicle.
In the light of this new information, it seems that several things that have been written about the STS-48 video have to be reconsidered concerning the behavior of space shuttle thrusters. Another video taken during the more recent STS-102 mission also is reexamined here because of its similarities with the STS-48 video.
STS-48;
A time-lapse composite of video frames before and after the light flash is shown in Figure 4. Several objects move almost immediately when the light flash occurs. Their position at the time of the flash is indicated by the red dots in the image. The light flash and movements of the objects has been attributed to the orbiter's L5D thruster (left side firing down).
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image007.jpg
Figure 4: Time-lapse image of objects in the STS-48 video created from a composite of video frames spaced at 1-second intervals.
Since there was no serious malfunction during the STS-48 mission, if the light flash observed were from the L5D thruster, it could only mark the end of the thruster burn, not the beginning. Figure 5 shows a graph I made for an earlier article[7] concerning this light flash. There is a faint "pre-flash" that might seem to fill the role of a very brief jet of "snow" at the start of the thruster firing, assuming the camera, which was set to for low light levels, could detect light that is too faint to be perceived by the human eye.
The pre-flash occurs 0.4 seconds before bright "main flash" that seems to have caused the objects in the video to move. But the L5D thruster firing supposedly responsible for the flash was 1.2 seconds in duration, so the pre- and post-burn flashes should have been 1.2 seconds apart, not 0.4 seconds. Worse for the thruster theory, the exhaust exits the nozzle at a speed of 3500 meters per second.
If it is assumed that the exhaust plume hit the objects just as the thruster shut down, the objects would have to be over 4 kilometers away from the shuttle, since that is the distance the exhaust plume would travel in 1.2 seconds before impinging on the objects.
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image009.jpg
Figure 5: STS-48 video average frame brightness over seven seconds plotted at 1/30-second intervals. Start time corresponds to the video display clock time of 20:39:23. Objects in the video changed course at the time of the highest intensity peak in this graph.
There is a third pulse that occurs roughly 1.3 seconds after the main flash that might be suspected to be the rocket's shutdown flash, but again it is much fainter than the main flash, which shouldn't be the case if the third pulse was the light from the dribble volume of fuel escaping after thruster shutdown. And there should be only one or two light pulses, not three.
However, a post-burn jet of "snow" might explain one seemingly anomalous characteristic of the light flash I noted in my previous article: the three light pulses occurred during a period of elevated background brightness in the image that lasted for at least 5 seconds, which is much longer than the 1.2-second duration of the thruster firing.
The jet of snow at shutdown probably travels at a much slower rate than the 3500m/sec speed of the (invisible) plume of combustion products during the thruster burn. Moving at a slower rate, it would disperse much more slowly than combustion products and thus linger as a diffuse cloud, perhaps reflecting enough sunlight to raise the background brightness for several seconds. So this one characteristic of the post-burn plume from the thruster might support the thruster hypothesis.
But all its other characteristics make the thruster hypothesis seem even more preposterous than it did when I wrote the earlier article, which assumed that thrusters can "flare up" sporadically, as Oberg would have it.
STS-102;
The relationship between thruster firings and "flashes" of light reflected from unburned combustion products also has relevance to a video taken during Space Shuttle Discovery's STS-102 mission in March 2001. As in the STS-48 video, a light flash occurs in the STS-102 video and a slow-moving object abruptly changes course. This is shown in the time-lapse composite of Figure 6. Another object appears at the top of the frame and seems to pursue the slower-moving "main" object. A high-speed object also appeared to be pursuing Object M1 in the STS-48 video, but was moving too fast to be captured in the time-lapse image of Figure 4.
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image011.jpg
Figure 6: Time exposure overlay of frames at 1-second intervals from STS-102 video. The red shows the position of the object when the light flash occurs.
In a previous article[8] I noted that the time display in the Mission Control Room, which appeared briefly in the STS-102 video, indicated that the light flash occurred at least 5 seconds before the closest thruster firing, which occurred at 12:30:39 GMT. Since it is impossible for the thruster firing to be the cause of an event that preceded it in time, it could not have been the cause of the light flash – assuming the mission control time display was accurate.
Another event occurred in the STS-102 video that has been suggested as support for the "prosaic" thruster hypothesis. This event was a second flash of light that occurred 1.3 seconds after the first flash. As it happens, 1.3 seconds was also the amount of time that elapsed between the start of the 12:30:39 firing suspected to be associated with the light flash and the next firing at 12:30:40.3.
While I assumed this was probably a random coincidence, the argument has been made that the elapsed times are the same because the flashes came from the thruster at the beginnings of the two firings. But as previously noted, the NASA engineer said that the visible plumes of unburned propellant come at the end of a thruster firing and not at the beginning. In this case, the elapsed time between the end of the first and second firings was 0.96 seconds (12:30:39.548 GMT and 12:39:40.508 GMT) – significantly less than the 1.3 seconds between the observed light flashes.
The elapsed time between the end of the first and second thruster firings does not agree with the elapsed time between the first and second light flash, assuming the visible flashes mark thruster shutoff, as the NASA engineer asserted. In that case, a rocket firing can be ruled out as the cause of the object's motion in the STS-102.
Even if it is assumed that the light pulses come at both the beginning and the end of a thruster burn and that the startup pulse can be brighter than the shutoff pulse, Figure 7 shows the actual brightness curve still cannot be matched to a thruster firing. The first peak at time A (when the "main object" in the video changes course) might correspond to the startup pulse of the thruster burn and the second peak at time B might correspond to the "shutoff" pulse. But the peak at B would be 0.37 seconds into the 0.48-second burn, assuming it started at time A in Figure 7.
This would indicate the burn was prematurely interrupted and that a "snow" of unburned propellant was being expelled from the thruster rather than the hot gases of combustion more than 1/10 of a second before the intended thruster shutoff. Such a premature interruption of the firing could signal a potentially serious problem with the propellant supply, such as the ingestion by the thruster of a large bubble of helium.
Helium is the gas that is used to pressurize the propellant so that it will flow to the thruster immediately when the fuel and oxidizer valves are opened. A small amount of helium is always in solution with the liquid propellants, but it is never supposed to form large gas bubbles in the propellant lines.
http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/R...s/image013.png
Figure 7: STS-102 video average frame brightness over 2 seconds plotted at 1/30-second intervals. The length of time from A to D is close to the 1.28-seconds between documented thruster burns. The length of time between A and C is the duration of the first thruster burn assumed to start at time A. The rise in brightness to the peak near B might seem to correspond to the first burn's "shutoff" light pulse but that peak comes a tenth of a second before the assumed shutoff time.
Conclusion;
There are only two cases that I know of in which objects in a space shuttle video react to a light flash with a radical change in course: STS-48 and STS-102. The information I've received from an expert in the shuttle's RCS propulsion system provides a compelling refutation of Oberg's argument that thruster firings were the cause of the objects' behavior in both cases.
Another assertion by Oberg that is incorrect is that propellant seeping out of propellant lines and freezing in the nozzle is a routine occurrence on the orbiter. To the contrary, it is an indication of a potentially serious leak according to the NASA engineer.
If such a leak is detected the caution and warning system notifies the crew that a "Fail-Leak" condition has occurred. The leaking thruster is then isolated by shutting valves upstream of the leak. There is no record that I know of that any such failure occurred during either STS-48 or STS-102, at least during the time when the videos were taken. Based on Oberg's statements, it had seemed to me that in both the STS-48 and STS-102 videos the high-speed "projectiles" seemingly pursuing slower-moving objects might be explained as ice chunks expelled from the nozzle during the rocket burn.
But as the presence of such ice in the thruster would indicate a possibly serious problem with the shuttle propulsion system, this explanation no longer seems feasible.
Finally, Oberg stated that the speed of the RCS rocket exhaust gases is about 1000 feet per second. Their actual speed is 3500 meters or 11,482 feet per second.[9] That is ten times faster than the speed he cited. This error is of no great importance to the question of apparent anomalous objects in shuttle videos. But it is one more indication that while Oberg may well be an expert on many aspects of space flight, he evidently has no particular expertise or experience with the RCS propulsion system.
While the NASA engineer I spoke with was a legitimate authority on the space shuttle's RCS rockets, it should be apparent from reading this article that I have not simply made an appeal to authority here just because what he said severely undermines the "prosaic" explanations for these space shuttle videos. Instead, I've tried to verify his assertions to the extent feasible by checking independent references and data sources such as the RCS combustion chamber pressure records for STS-48. Everything I've found was consistent with what he told me.
The brightness curves for both the STS-48 and the STS-102 videos do not match what would be expected for reflected light from unburned RCS propellant if it is assumed that the light flash comes only at the end of a thruster burn as asserted by the NASA engineer I discussed the question with. Even if it is assumed that a light flash can be detected at the beginning of a thruster firing by a light-sensitive camera, the brightness curves in both videos still do not match what would be expected for a thruster burn.
References;
[1] http://www.debunker.com/texts/sts48_ufo.html
[2] For example, http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/nasafact/count2.htm
[3] http://www.shuttlepresskit.com/scom/220.pdf
[4] http://www.igs.net/~hwt/zigzag.html
[5] http://www.cdli.ca/CITE/sts_orbit.htm
[6] http://www.asi.org/adb/04/03/09/hydrazine-info.html
[7] http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/flash.pdf
[8] http://www.vgl.org/webfiles/STS-48/STS-102/STS-102.htm
-
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part two;
UFO - The Secret Government
UFO - The Real History
UFO - It Has Begun
UFO Hunters
Reverse Engineering
Giant Triangles
Aurora & TX
UFO - Road Trip (all 12 episodes)
Secrets Of The 3rd Reich;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPkSg8V2O7A&feature=gv
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part three;
ALIEN 5²
Official FAA cockpit recordings of pilot UFO sightings
The Disclosure Project - Disclosure Witness Testimony
(1/2) (2/2)
UFO's Under Investigation Episode 101 ;
Paul Hellyer Interview
British UFO Files
UFOs and the White House
UFOs - Cause For Alarm
UFO Conference - Ex MI6 British Spy Lecture
Russian UFO Secrets ;
UFO - Down to Earth - Great Balls of Fire
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000937355
The Best UFO Cases Ever Caught On Tape
http://www.joost.com/249i7es/t/The-B...Caught-On-Tape
UFO - The Pacific Bermuda Triangle
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000868791
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part four;
UFO's Under Investigation Episode 101
Paul Hellyer Interview
British UFO Files
UFOs and the White House
UFOs - Cause For Alarm
UFO Conference - Ex MI6 British Spy Lecture
Russian UFO Secrets
UFO - Down to Earth - Great Balls of Fire
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000937355
The Best UFO Cases Ever Caught On Tape
http://www.joost.com/249i7es/#/?noSc...o_info=249i7es
UFO - The Pacific Bermuda Triangle
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000868791
Aztec 1948 UFO crash
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v876273TNbCb4R4
UFO's Over Earth - Mass Sightings in Mexico
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v171177478YGSFd5F
Aliens of the Deep
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v6551950XwDJ4WBd
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part five;
Tales of the Unexplained UFO Chronicles
http://www.joost.com/249i7fs/#/?noSc...o_info=249i7fs
UFO Files - Black Box UFO Secrets
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000921008
Dan Aykroyd David Sereda Unplug on UFO
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v9484117ap85Z32
UFO's Over Earth - The Fayetteville Incident
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v17117746cqNbXgWc
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part six;
UFOs in American History
Hidden Technology - 30 Billion Dollar Secret
ufo documentary declassified
Scifi UFO's The Secret
UFO's Under Investigation - Episode 110
David Sereda – NASA's Dilemma Caught on Tape
UFO - Unexplained Mysteries - Ufo Best Evidence
UFO Gateway to Hell
Giant UFO in Yukon Territory
Unsolved Mysteries 1- UFOs Roswell
UFO's Under Investigation - Episode 102;
UFO Diaries Part III-2 - Pyramids the Alien Connection
UFO Diaries - Part III 1 - The First Ufo s - Zecharia Sitchin
Former Canadian Defense Minister confirms UFO reality
UFO - When UFOs Arrive
UFO: Mexico's Roswell
UFO Panel UFOs Secret Technology And Hidden History
UFO Panel UFOs Secret Technology And Hidden History
Demonic UFOs - The Prophecy Club
The Secret Government, Majestic 12, UFOs, Drugs and the Illuminati
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part six;
UFO Connection - UFOs And The Media - Looking For The Truth
Close Encounters with UFOs! Is national Security on the line?
http://www.guba.com/watch/3000097111
UFO Disclosure
UFO Connection -The Woobridge UFO Incident - Bentwaters
UFO - Cattle Mutilations
Richard Dolan - National Security and UFOs - 1941 to 1973
Richard Dolan - How UFO Secrecy Has Damaged American Society
UFOs on NASA Space Shuttle Mission STS-115 Full Version
Richard Dolan - National Security and UFOs - 1973 to Present
Nazi UFO Documentary
UFO ON THE MOON
UFO Cover-Up - Debunking the Debunkers
Phoenix UFO confirmed: George Noory interviews former Governor of Arizona
UFO We Are NOT Alone
UFO's Over Earth - The Bucks County Flap
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v17117748xxJZzpPm
UFO Files - Cattle Mutilations
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000836159
LMH Investigative UFO Science and Bismuth Magnesium Layering
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part 7
UFOs and DUMBs
Nick Pope - Britain's Continuing UFO Project - Ministry of Defense
The truth about UFOs and ETs
UFO Deception
UFO - GREATEST STORY EVER DENIED II (MOON RISING) ;
UFO Files - Alien Engineering
Part - 1 (1/5) Part - 2 (1/5)
NEW SWIRLED ORDER (crop circle documentary 2009)
-
UFO DOCUMENTARIES; part 8;
UFOs Are Here ! - The Deyo Diaries Volume 1 with Stan Deyo;
The Deyo Diaries;
Featuring:
"Steven Spielberg, Stan Deyo, Jacques Vallee, Prof. Allen Hynek, Stanton Friedman, Margaret Mead, Ken Arnold, Betty Hill, Rev. William Gill, Klaus Nobel, RAAF Sqdn Ldr White, Ray Palmer and Colin Cameron. This amazing UFO documentary film was produced in 1977. It was way ahead of its time. Sadly, the master copies of this film and the two which followed it have been lost to the ravages of time. Only one VHS copy of it survived; so Channel 9 gave us permission to convert it to digital video in an effort to preserve it as an archive for the use of posterity. This film inspired Stan Deyo to write "The Cosmic Conspiracy" book which is the sequel to the shows. The man-made, flying saucer programs are exposed in the book and the film".
************************************************** ********
Best UFO Cases Caught On Tape
Larry King Live - UFOs Are They Out There?
O'Hare UFO Leaked News Footage Seconds Before Broadcast
http://www.rudespace.com/yvideo.php?...ore-broadcast=
HARD EVIDENCE
Evidence The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v18220995p6fs4hxQ
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 2
The Case for Antigravity
Gary Mckinnon (Hacked NASA & the Dept. of Defense)
NASA's Dilemma Caught on Tape
UFO HIDDEN EVIDENCE
Compilation of UFO Video Footage and Testimony
UFOs Uncovered
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...097457pfzykY5C
UFOs and National Security
Roswell: The UFO Uncover-up
http://www.joost.com/249i7fq/t/Roswe...UFO-Uncover-up
Edgar Mitchell UFO Story
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eve_The_Hype_/
UFO Secrets of WW2
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...140604hBGnehPa
UFO Mysteries TV pilot
http://www.tuvetube.com/video/10631/...eries-TV-pilot
UFO's Over Earth - The Fayetteville Incident
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...117746cqNbXgWc
UFO's Over Earth - The Bucks County Flap
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...117748xxJZzpPm
UFO's Over Earth - Mass Sightings in Mexico
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...1177478YGSFd5F
UFO - Down to Earth - Reason to Believe
http://www.guba.com/watch/2000827960
UFO: Target Earth
UFOs Over Military Sites
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...2894447NQwFt6C
Aztec 1948 UFO crash
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...876273TNbCb4R4
UFO Documentary - The Greatest Secret
Monsters of the UFO: Incident At Kelly
UFO Conference
UFO: Friend, Foe Or Fantasy
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_vi...ml?id=2935380n
Tales of the Unexplained - UFO Chronicles
http://www.joost.com/249i7fs/t/Tales...UFO-Chronicles
Dr. Wolf Top Secret UFO Interview
UFO's: The Real History
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...490021EFsydNG4
Terence McKenna - Shamanic Approaches to the UFO
Russian Docu - Secrets of the Third Reich II (Nazi Bases in Antarctica)
Pilot Audio UFO Report-O'Hare Airport Chicago
Arte German English UFO Docu
-
Manipulated Government Management of UFO/Media;
Here is the first part of a PEER REVIEWED paper on the "History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and Television";
Parallel, Vol. 25 (Spring 2011) Graham & Alford
ISSN: 1753-5794 (online)
A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and Television;
Robbie Graham University of Bristol and Matthew Alford University of Bath
university;
quote;
"On 22 January 1958, the popular CBS television show Armstrong Circle Theatre presented an entire programme dedicated to the subject of unidentified flying objects entitled: “UFO: Enigma of the Skies.” Among the high-profile experts invited to speak on the show, retired US Navy Major Donald Keyhoe – director of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) – was notable for his outspoken views on government secrecy surrounding the UFO phenomenon.
Arguing against UFO reality on the programme were astronomer and vehement UFO sceptic Donald Menzel and Air Force representative Col. Spencer Whedonof the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC). Their task should have been an easy one as the show’s content had been scripted in advance by CBS in conjunction with the US Air Force, and all guests – especially Keyhoe – had been instructed to read their preapproved material from a teleprompter.
When it came time for Keyhoe to speak, in frustration he veered from his script and stated to the nation: “And now I’m going to reveal something that has never been disclosed before...”
The rest of his announcement went unheard by television
viewers: unbeknownst to Keyhoe, his microphone had been cut by the station. Keyhoe continued:
"For the last six months, we have been working with a congressional
committee investigating official secrecy about UFOs. If all the evidence we have given this committee is made public in open hearings, it will absolutely prove that the UFOs are real machines under intelligent control".
link for pdf peer reviewed paper
http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/b...and-Alford.pdf
-
Here is the rest of this peer reviewed paper,it seems to indicate that the two authors of this paper have agreed that the UFO perception and the over all 'treatment' it receives from the corporate media is manipulated and censored;Avery good paper from two university dues i may add;
************************************************** ********
"After the show, CBS was inundated with calls and letters from viewers
demanding to know why Keyhoe’s audio had been cut: “Call it what you like,” wrote one viewer, “but it appeared to be a very shocking display of censorship; and certainly offensive to the intelligence of the American public...”
Nine days later, CBS admitted it had been subject to official censorship. In a letter to a disgruntled viewer dated 31 January, 1958, CBS director of editing, Herbert A. Carlborg, stated: This program had been carefully cleared for security reasons.
Therefore, it was the responsibility of this network to insure [sic] performance in accordance with pre-determined security standards.
Any indication that there would be a deviation might lead to statements
that neither this network nor the individuals on the program were authorized to release.
link for further reading
http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/b...and-Alford.pdf
-
Stephen Spielberg's comments/ Dr J. Allen Hyneks;
Film Crew Comments, Dr. Allen Hynek (Making of Close Encounters of the Third Kind 1997);
Following on from my previous two posts on the topic of "A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and Television"here we deal with an interview from Stephen Spielberg commenting on Dr J. Allen Hynek"s work on the movie 'Close encounters of the third kind';
Dr J. Allen Hynek was a scientific governmental adviser and investigator for the "USAF UFO" investigation committee called "PROJECT BLUE BOOK";Spielberg's comments discussing the work of Dr J. Allen Hyneks influences on the film 'Close encounters of the third kind' is interesting and is included here to show that the MSM/HOLLYWOOD ect where and still are more aware of the nature of the perceptions the public should be exposed too or manipulated in regards to the UFO situation;
I will include the below quote from page five of the peer reviwed paper that dealt with "A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and Television" by Robbie Graham University of Bristol and Matthew Alford University of Bath;
quote from page five of peered reviewed paper;
"The government’s historical engagement with such fare can most thoroughly be discussed with regard to the Department of Defense (DoD), which has worked extensively with Hollywood in exchange for the right to edit scripts for sixty years
In relation to the topic of this post and the previous ones that dealt with the history of the governments manipulation of the UFO enigma through media out lets such as television ect ,i feel that the work of a one Richard Dolan is well worth including here;Below is a section from his book,"UFOs and the National Security State Volume 1, 1941-1973 by Richard M. Dolan
http://keyholepublishing.com/availab...pre-order!.gif
Can They Really Cover This Up?
quote;
"UFO skeptics often ask, “do you really think the government could hide something like this for so long?” The question itself reflects ignorance of the reality that secrecy is a way of life in the national security state. Actually, though, the answer is yes, and no".
"Yes, in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure, frequently unknown to the public for decades, becoming public knowledge by a mere roll of the dice. But also no, in that UFO information has leaked out from the very beginning. It is impossible to shut the lid completely. The key lies in neutralizing and discrediting unwelcome information, sometimes through official denial, other times through proxies in the media".
The severity of military orders are certainly a major incentive to secrecy. In addition, the history of the U.S. media shows unsettling developments, not least of which is penetration by the intelligence community. By the early 1950s, the CIA had cozy relationships with most major media executives in America. The most significant of these were with the below MSM outlets;
1;The New York Times,
2;The Washington Post,
3; The Christian Science Monitor,
4; The New York Herald-Tribune,
5;The Saturday Evening Post,
6; The Miami Herald,
7;Time-Life, CBS News,
8;Scripps-Howard Newspapers,
9; Hearst Newspapers,
10; the Associated Press,
11; United Press International,
12; the Mutual Broadcasting System,
13; and Reuters. In addition, the CIA had major ownership over many proprietary publications throughout the Europe, Asia, and the Americas.
By the early 1970s, the agency admitted to having working relationships with over 400 American journalists. Consider the possibilities with 400 strategically placed people throughout the mainstream media. There is evidence that this relationship continues.
The result is effective news management. Without question, the mainstream media has supported government propaganda about UFOs. From 1947 onward, while the Air Force worked to remove the UFO problem from the public domain, the media helped it to ridicule the subject. The release of every major Air Force and CIA statement about UFOs has, without exception, been met by uncritical media acquiescence.
It is true that the decade of the 1990s has brought a different kind of media openness about UFOs than existed in past decades, due to the recognition that money can be made. The net result, however, is a very mixed bag. At the same time that such television networks as A&E and Discovery have provided fairly serious documentaries on the subject, UFOs have essentially become an adjunct of pop culture. Moreover, serious treatment by the major networks has remained non-existent.
-
Police UFO Witnesses;
In this posts we will concentrate on the police officer witnesses who have encountered UFO sightings and who have had the courage to come forward with their reports;Below are just a few UFO reports witnessed by and from the hundreds of experienced and credible police officers
UK Police UFO Witnesses;
2008 Jun 20 - UK Police Chopper In Near Collision With UFO
UK1;
quote;
"On the 20th of June 2008, a helicopter of police officers landing at a Welsh Airforce Base were involved in a near hit with a departing UFO. Reports in the media that the "UFO attack" was repeated and that a chase ensued have been denied by officialdom but reports from witnesses who watched the helicopter pursue the UFO are persistent.
"After the story broke on 20th June the story changed and the police were careful to use the phrase "unusual aircraft" as opposed to UFO. Additionally, while confirming the sighting, they denied a chase had taken place. Perhaps the most extraordinary aspect of the story was a quote from the MoD Press Office, where a spokesperson made the following comment: "But it is certainly not advisable for police helicopters to go chasing what they think are UFOs".
This story was followed by an even bigger one, when it transpired that a few hours before the police helicopter incident, soldiers at Tern Hill barracks in Shropshire saw several UFOs fly directly over their base. One of them filmed the objects on his cellphone. The Sun (the UK's best-selling national daily newspaper) ran the story on the front page under the headline "Army Spot UFOs Over Shropshire". The film is inconclusive and may even just show so-called Chinese lanterns, but the front page media coverage was almost without precedent.
(UFO Hunters - UFO Storm);
(PoliceOracle.com)
************************************************** ********
2008 May 2 - Police Chopper In Birmingham UFO Incident;
UK2;
quote;
"There had been an incident involving a police helicopter over the city of Birmingham. The incident occurred on 2nd May at a height of around 1500 feet and the UFO came close enough for the pilot to take evasive action. An official investigation was undertaken by the UK Airprox Board, a body sponsored jointly by the Civil Aviation Authority and the MoD. They found no explanation for the incident.
(NickPope.net)
************************************************** ********
2003 May - Patrol Car Pursues UFO
UK3;
quote;
"In Skipton, North Yorkshire, in May 2003, an anonomous officer witnessed and pursued a UFO, with the entire event captured on his dashboard camera.
(Youtube)
(UFO Hunters - Cops vs UFOs)
************************************************** ********
2000 Aug 11 - Police Helicopter Chases UFO Over Brighton
UK4;
quote;
"Sergeant John Tickner and paramedic Sean Mitchell of the Sussex Police force were flying 1000 feet above Brighton in their helicopter when ]they saw an object begin to approach them from the left. They filmed the unidentified flying object using their onboard camera as it first approached them, then swept past, unheeding.
In shape resembling a compact cylinder, it did not look like any conventional aircraft they had ever seen. They decided to give chase while filming it. They pursued it for three minutes before losing track of it, using the camera continuously and even switching to a thermal-imaging view at one point. A popular explanation was a chinese lantern.
(UfoEncouters.co.uk)
(Youtube)
************************************************** ********
2000 Nov 11 - Crop Circle Hoaxer Prosecuted;
UK6
quote;
"A significant breakthrough occurred in Britain, and this time it was for both the police and crop-circle researchers, who succeeded in engineering the arrest, charge, prosecution and fining of Mathew Williams for damages to crop which resulted from the hoaxing of crop-circles. While ultimately admitting and taking responsibility for the damages, Williams persists that the accusation of “hoaxing” was unfounded on the basis that his intentions were not, in this case, deceptive or malicious, but a scientific demonstration on behalf of American researchers.
(Secrets in the Fields - The Science and Mysticism of Crop Circles, Freddy Silva.)
************************************************** ********
1988 Oct - Police Report Low-flying Oval UFOs
UK14
Kent and Sussex.
In Britain, in October 1988, in Kent and Sussex, police and civilians witnesses were reporting UFOs, typically of an oval-shaped object with four bright white lights and a red light in the center, flying low, and giving off a deep hum. Two witnesses said the object suddenly climbed vertically into the evening sky.
(UFOs and the National Security State, Volume 2 – The Coverup Exposed, Richard Dolan, Pg 461. [157])
(Redfern, Nicolas, A Covert Agenda, p 166.)
************************************************** ********
1987 Jun 21 - Dozens of Officers Witness UFO Over Stonehenge
UK5
...
...
Officer Phill Hutchins along with over a dozen others officers were on guard at Stonehenge when at aprox 2-3am a UFO aproached and manuevered above. Phill made no formal report for fear of ridicule.
(UFO Hunters - Cops vs UFOs)
************************************************** ********
1980 Dec 29 - PC Alan Godfrey
UK7
Tolmorden West Yorkshire 05:00-05:50hrs Wits: Muliple Officers CE4
PC Alan Godfrey
West Yorkshire Police
On the 29 December 1980, at 05:00-05:50 hours, in Tolmorden, West Yorkshire, PC Alan Godfrey was making one last sweep of a housing estate when he looked up the road to see what he initially thought was a bus slew across the road, but was a diamond shaped UFO hovering in a stationary position five feet above the road.
He was within 20-50 feet of the craft and he described the object as being 20 feet wide and 14 feet high with windows on the top part whilst the bottom part rotated anticlockwise. He attempted to contact his local police control via the vehicle’s radio set but it would not function nor would his personal radio. Whilst he sat in the car he decided to sketch the object in front of him. Moments later he suddenly found himself driving down the same road approximately 50-100 yards further on, with the object gone.
Puzzled and shaken by the experience he drove back towards Todmorden Police station where he saw a colleague on foot patrol. He picked him up and drove him back to the scene of his encounter where they found a circular dry patch on the wet road. Godfrey stated that the rotation of the craft had caused nearby trees and bushes to shake and Leaves and branches had formed a circular pattern where Godfrey claimed the UFO had been. Only hours later did it emerge that he had suffered a period of ‘missing time’ of approximately 15-20 minutes which he couldn’t account for at the end of his shift.
One of his boots had sustained a split under his foot that hadn’t been there earlier in the shift. He also found a red mark on his foot that developed into an irritating rash which later required minor medical treatment and persisted for several days after the incident. In a hypnosis session, one widely regarded as one of Britain’s finest UFO abduction examples, he recalled that he had got out of the police vehicle to get a better look at the object, however an intense white light had enveloped him which frightened him and he sought the sanctuary of the police car, when he suddenly found himself elsewhere. To this day he does not have any conscious memories of the abduction scenario and finds it difficult to comprehend himself.
A member of the public also saw a similar coloured object in the town itself minutes prior. Two on-duty uniformed traffic officers observed a very bright UFO low on the horizon. The officers contacted Allan Godfrey approximately one year after his sighting, fearing ridicule. One hour before, at 04:00 hours, PC John Porter, PC Howard Turnpenny, PC Julie Baxter and a fourth officer were high on the moors when they observed a blue coloured UFO making a series of angular turns low across the valley. The object jerked from one side of the valley to the other and was last seen heading in the direction of Tolmorden. This was officially reported by telex to West Yorkshire HQ in Wakefield. [1]
Allan filled official forms which were sent to the Ministry of Defense. A letter from Ministry of Denfense, in response to an enquiry by Alan, stated no such records existed. Not long after, Alan was suddenly told he was to be transferred to Wakefield, but he didn’t want to go. After returning from holiday he was then transferred to Halifax, in complete disregard to his settled life with his wife and three children. Upon arriving at Halifax, Alan was told he wasn’t to mix with the public. Later he was ordered to appear at a hospital for an exam. Upon arrival at the hospital he was surprised to find that it was a psychiatric hospital.
Alan attended the exam with a colleague, where he was told by the doctor, “We understand that you have hallucinations and you’ve seen little green men and flying saucers.” Fortunately, Alan’s colleague came to his defence, saying, “Whoa, whoa. Let me tell you something. I’ve seen one and so have a lot of Alan’s colleagues,” naming some of the officers, and the doctors sat with their jaws open. Later Alan returned to his old police station, and was told that he had been barred from the station, “because things have been going missing.”
The following day, Alan enquired about the order, of his division head, who claimed to have no knowledge of the official order. Alan threatened legal action. Later, Alan went to his locker and found the lock broken and the on the floor. Inside the locker were suspected contraband drugs. Alan disposed of the drugs down the toilet and informed his sergeant. The next day at work, Alan was called aside to be questioned by internal affairs, who then proceeded to search Alan’s locker. The investigators were apparently “absolutely livid” to find nothing unusual.[2]
(1. PRUFOS Case 93, 97, 96, Alan Godfrey interviews 2002.)
(2. Disclosure - Military and Government Witnesses Reveal the Greatest)
************************************************** ********
1980 Dec 26 - Rendlesham Forest UFO Incident
UK8
quote;
"A UFO seemed to have lured a security team from a highly-secured airforce nuclear facility into a nearby forest near England's south east coast. UFO sightings were reported over two nights and high ranking personnel reported seeing a triangular UFO land. The craft alledgedly had writing clearly enscribed on its surface. Someone touched the surface of the craft. Three heavy equalateral impressions caused by several tonnes were plaster-casted at the site. High levels of radiation in the area were measured to peek in the impressions. Other witnesses reported a bright red light that darted about the forest which seemed to 'wink'.
The British Police featured in the event, and famous photographs of a British police officer along with Captain Mike Verrano of the USAF at the alleged landing site exist. Investigations into the Rendlesham Constabulary have been a challenge to investigators, with the local police being extremely difficult and suspicious, acting almost with a fearful silence on the topic.
(You Can’t Tell the People, Georgina Bruni.)
(See also UFO Hunters - Military vs UFOs)
(See also Unsolved Mysteries)
************************************************** ********
1978,1979,2x1983 - Sergeant Anthony Dodd
UK9
North Yorkshire WITS:Muliple CE1/Photos
Sergeant Anthony Dodd
North Yorkshire Police
In January 1978, at 0230 hours, Sergeant Tony Dodd and Constable Alan Dale were travelling in a police car when they observed a dome shaped circular UFO in the vicinity of Cononley near Skipton, North Yorkshire. At close proximity, and at an altitude of 100 feet, it moved silently over fields before passing directly over the police car. Portholes could be seen on the upper dome and there were three spheres protruding from its underside. The object was seen going over a hill as if to land. They were joined by another officer in a marked vehicle who confirmed that he too had witnessed the UFO from a different position. [a]
In January 1979, at 02:30, along the A65 Skipton to Gargrave road, Tony and another officer were traveling in a marked car in dangerous snowy conditions to meet another police vehicle to exchange internal mail when they saw a bright light in the distance. The object was stationary for a moment before slowly moving across the landscape. The object was dome shaped with a white light that appeared to be coming from some kind of window structure. [b]
Tony had two more sightings in 1983. On the 14 March at 03:15, he observed two UFOs passing over the Carleton Moor. [c]
And yet again, on the 7 November, at 19:55 hours, between Bolton Abbey and Addingham, near Skipton, whilst driving, Tony and his wife observed a large disc shape, estimated as four times the size of a car, approaching the car from their right. At low altitude, it passed almost directly over the car before disappearing behind nearby trees. His wife described the craft as resembling a child’s spinning top.
Moments later the same UFO reappeared and swept toward the car once again. Tony pulled the car over and took a series of photographs. Scientific analysis concluded the object to be 30 feet in diameter and near spherical in shape. [d]
Sergeant Anthony Dodd subsequently became a famous UFO investigator and researcher. Now one of the world’s leading experts on UFOs and alien visitation, Tony is the author of “Alien Investigator – the case files of Britains Leading UFO detective”, the story of his investigations into the UFO phenomenon. Dodd passed away on 24 March, 2009 after a long fight with illness.
(Photo PRUFOS, Credit Hasemann)
(a. PRUFOS Case 68, Original Source - Alien Investigator, Pages 7-10)
(b. PRUFOS Case 76, Original Source - Alien Investigator, Pages 20-21)
(c. PRUFOS Case 116, Original Source – Yorkshire Post)
(d. PRUFOS Case 21, Orginal Source - Alien Investigator, Pages 26-28)
(Alien Investigator, Tony Dodd, Headline Publishing Books)
(Youtube Interview with Dodd)
(Youtube Interview with Dodd)
************************************************** ********
1977 Aug 28 - Police Watch Flying Stingray Fish
UK12
Windermere, Cumbria.
On August 28, 1977, shortly after midnight, a large object with lights was seen near Windermere, Cumbria. For more than twenty minutes, British Police and citizens observed the object which resembled "the shape of a stingray fish," apparently triangular in shape. All witnesses reported it as silent, except one person who reported a "quiet hum."
(UFOs and the National Security State, Volume 2 – The Coverup Exposed, Richard Dolan, pg 156. [72])
(Redfern, Nicholas, "A Covert Agenda", p 131-133.)
************************************************** ********
1977 Autumn - Officer Lost 20mins From UFO
UK13
Sussex.
In the early fall of 1977, an anonymous British police officer in Sussex saw a UFO on a bright day while off duty and waiting for a bus. The object looked like a domed saucer, had the look of polished metal, was green-greyish in colour, and had a blue-green light on top. She saw a thick black circular section on the bottom of the craft, and heard no sound. She waved to the object, which then came closer. Her memory seemed unclear after this, but when the bus arrived, she felt numb and uncoordinated. The object was gone, and she had unaccountably lost twenty minutes of time.
(UFOs and the National Security State, Volume 2 – The Coverup Exposed, Richard Dolan, Pg 156. [73])
(Good, Timothy, "Above Top Secret", p 115-116.)
************************************************** ********
1975 - Detective Constable 1877 Garry Heseltine
UK10
Bottesford/Scunthorpe Lincolnshire Wits:2 CE2
Detective Constable 1877 Gary Heseltine
British Transport Police;
As young 15year-old Heseltine walked along a footpath adjacent to his school, Frederick Gough Comprehensive, he saw a brilliant white light pass from right to left. As the object moved slowly across the landscape all electrical power behind its flight path cut off plunging the area into darkness. As he continued to watch it a series of further power cuts followed. His then-girlfriend was with him at the time who also observed the object. The UFO was seen against a backdrop of a clear summer night sky and appeared to have no sound.
Because it was heading in the direction of his home he decided to drop his girlfriend off first and then race back on his bike in an effort to get ahead of it by way of a short cut. This he did and just made it in time to observe it pass over the garden of his home. He rushed inside and told his parents that he believed a power cut was imminent but they looked at him bemused. No sooner had it passed over a thirty minute power cut followed.
Inspired by the UFO sighting as a teenager, Heseltine began to compile a database of British Police Officer UFO sightings, publishing his first report in 2001, under the title of the Police Reporting UFO Sightings (PRUFOS) report. Of note, is that Heseltine’s own teenage sighting has not appeared in his database, however a second sighting in 1999 does appear in the off-duty category, consisting of three lights moving in an arrow formation. Heseltine’s work appeared on the History Channel in the US in a program called “UFO Hunters” on the 5th of March 2008, an episode focused on officer UFOs. Heseltine also appeared as a consultant military police officer in "UFO Hunters - Military vs UFOs".
paper and TV company in Britain. However he is slowly making some headway having appeared on the BBC. Heseltine's PRUFOS Database represents the largest known Police Officer UFO sightings catalogue in Britain to date, if not the biggest Officer UFO sightings catalogue in the world. While Dodd has researched critical aspects of the UFO enigma, Heseltine has focused clearly on the Policing issue.
Heseltine also managed a related project, the online magazine “UFO Monthly”, which could found at UFOmonthly.com. Much of Heseltine’s UFO work on police UFOs was published in this journal, however he has ceased production of “UFO Monthly”, and is now co-editor of “UFO Data” which can be found at UFOdata.com. Heseltine’s 2006 PRUFOS Police Report was featured in his sister project, UFO Monthly, December 2005. Heseltine makes it clear throughout his publications, that he is urging all officers to come forward with their UFO accounts safe in the knowledge that he can safeguard identity.
Many British officers have truly heeded his call, many now even coming forward publicly with their name and photo. While Heseltine claims that most of his research time is restricted by his job as a detective, the progress he has made is nothing short of phenomenal, and while concentrating on Britain he has contributed to the topic globally. Heseltine won the 2010 Disclosures Award for his database of UFO sightings from UK police officers.
(telegraph.co.uk)
(Youtube.com); (Hull UFO Society, Past Speakers Profile, Gary Heseltine - PRUFOS)
(UFOmonthly, theWhyFiles)
[See also: Interview with Jerry Pippin]
[UFO Hunters Case 91104 - COPS vs UFOS. Part 3]
[UFO Hunters Case 80101 - Military vs UFOS. Part 3]
[To listen to an interview with Gary Heseltine, click here],
for further reports click link;
http://policeufo.com/index.html
