personal opinion: did we land on the moon?

touche

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WUnded Fox

Pikajew i been feeding you, training you, even grooming you all these years but you just refuse to evolve.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tony DANza

Lately, I have noticed a trend of your typical, bitter wu-corp poster using me as a canvas to try out random, off-topic jew jokes.

---

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Quote:

---

They aren't usually funny, but food for thought will almost certainly follow them with a "LOL!!"

---

how dare you. i love djooz.

Benny your anti semitism is disgusting

you dont know what anti-semitism means old man.


pikajew, you should check out the wu chamber. your uncle remedy is getting roasted. no pun intended lol

OH please indulge me on why your hatred of Jews is "okay".....


For all you claim to be...to spew jewish hatred like you do...

Its very disturbing...and very telling.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ol' Dirty Trixx

Not trying to be a cunt but that image of the two pics with glass structure looks like it is the same pic edited to look like two different pics. If they were two seperate images taken one after the other then the area and shape of the craters in the pic on the left would be a different size to the area and shape of the craters in the pic on the right.
see those numbers on the pics? go look the image files up yourself.

And those mile+ high structures just look like really bad photoshopping
thats the point. back befor photoshop, nasa would smudge out stuff from the pics. really badly as you can see.

---

look up nasa airbrushed photos.

all these images i'm posting have reference numbers and can be downloaded from the nasa or jaxa site.8 million huge image files that you can spend you days looking over finding all types of goodies.

dan weren't you the one who brought jooz into the discussion about the moon?

you like the super flamboyant gay dude who pops his neck and snaps his fingers but gets all loud when you say something about him being flamboyantly gay.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Undiluted Karma

The most retarded thing related to the universe any person or scientist can say is that for life to exist on other celestial bodies you need the same conditions as Earth. It's an overblown guess made on a stupid assumption. Just because no life has been found in the universe doesnt mean it doesnt exist, its a huge fucking universe and its not like every nook and cranny of the Moon and beneath the ground has been explored.

BBC:In the 19th century, many astronomers were convinced the Moon was inhabited by intelligent aliens. We now know that this isn't true. The Moon has no atmosphere, so life couldn't survive there. Just because we couldnt survive on the moon doesnt mean other life can't, assuming all life needs to the same conditions as survival as on Earth is retarded.

Already on Earth you have seen scientists expectations of life to be shattered such as life being discovered deep down in Sulphur pits in Ethiopia i think it was.

---

Actually life does need earth like conditions because the definition of life is actually rather limited. Intelligence does not need earth like conditions. Inorganic non living things could be sapient and sentient and live in massive palaces on Gk'eYi'aT. But they wouldn't be alive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WUnded Fox

please point out the man made structures in these satellite photos...
yup no life on this planet.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary.../earth_day.jpg

nope...none here either..
http://www.sweatygooch.com/wp-conten...aper-12340.jpg

---

I'm sorry but this doesn't look like a satellite pic at all. Everyone knows the earth isn't flat and four sided. Also when one half of the world is in day light then the other side is in darkness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ol' Dirty Trixx

I'm sorry but this doesn't look like a satellite pic at all. Everyone knows the earth isn't flat and four sided. Also when one half of the world is in day light then the other side is in darkness.

---

the worlds not flat??????


then were was i spending Christmas 2 years ago if not Nifflheim

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WUnded Fox

look up nasa airbrushed photos.

all these images i'm posting have reference numbers and can be downloaded from the nasa or jaxa site.8 million huge image files that you can spend you days looking over finding all types of goodies.

---

I can see the numbers on those images are different, but if they were two different images then you would see two different images. You're handy with photoshop, maybe you could superimpose the two images to see if i'm right in that the craters in both images (which are supposed to be taken from different angles) are actually identical. If they were indeed taken from different angles then the craters would look different.

Also, glass reflects and/or refracts light. If those structures were indeed made of glass then we ought to be able to see some sort of reflection/refraction including some sort of shadow too. Not blurry columns and white blobs that look so crude. if those structures were airbrushed then the shadows created by those structures should also be airbrushed too, but there isn't any airbrushing of any shadows to be seen in either of those pics.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Great Dane

the worlds not flat??????


then were was i spending Christmas 2 years ago if not Nifflheim

---

I hear it's unpleasant there. Niflheimr is not exactly a vacation spot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjDPB...eature=related

your joking right... dude Nifflheim is one of the most expensive vacation spots in all of the netherworld but Hel throws one hell of a Xmas party and its so worth it

wait i don't think i got that one right......

in case your wondering she moved there after she married

Explain to me as a mortal the difference between Asphodel and Niflheimr as opposed to the Isles of the Blessed and the Mount of purgation?

Also is Aides or Hermes Loki? Its hard to tell from the myths we humans get.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ol' Dirty Trixx

I'm sorry but this doesn't look like a satellite pic at all. Everyone knows the earth isn't flat and four sided. Also when one half of the world is in day light then the other side is in darkness.

---

I dont think thats what he meant by posting those pics.

Also, the oceans dont look blue like that from the satellites.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prolifical ENG

I dont think thats what he meant by posting those pics.

Also, the oceans dont look blue like that from the satellites.

---

Don't worry about it. Shes not very... on point.

fist off i wont talk about Loki we stopped talking after that thing with the horse
never been to Purgatory theres nothing there i want to see

Asphodel is a Meadow and inside the meadow is the city Tartarus is a nice place kinda like Chicago
Niflheim is a tundra with the awesome vacation spot Abode of Mis that sits right at the northern glaciers
and there about 7000 miles apart

the Isles of the Blessed is in the human world its Bermuda

Aides??????? i don't now that name i think you fucked your translation do mean Hades
Hermes is just another bastard angel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prolifical ENG

I dont think thats what he meant by posting those pics.

Also, the oceans dont look blue like that from the satellites.

---

I thought fox posted that pic (i can't see the second in that post cos of the content lock on my phone's browser) to prove that just because you can't actually see life in the pic of earth that doesn't mean life doesn't exist on earth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheBoarzHeadBoy

Don't worry about it. Shes not very... on point.

---

Well, if you're so smart why don't you correct me if i am wrong?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WUnded Fox

please point out the man made structures in these satellite photos...
yup no life on this planet.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary.../earth_day.jpg

nope...none here either..
http://www.sweatygooch.com/wp-conten...aper-12340.jpg

---

i'd also like to point out the absense of clouds in these pics make them highly suspect.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0StZ...eature=related

incase it doesnt work

^^^^^^^^^

That structure looks nowhere near 1.5 miles high.

if there is no/low gravity on the moon then how is that astronaut pictured taking a pic of that structure be able to stay still long enough to take that pic? and how did the astronaut taking the pic of that astronaut taking a pic of that structure stay still long enough to take his pic?

also, if the moon has no/low gravity then how can 1.5 mile high structures be built on the moon's surface and remain there? the structure doesn't look like it has any foundations either.

also, knowing scientists/explorers/whatever, they would have tried to take a sample of their findings back with them for research purposes. are there any such samples? can moon rock be made into glass? if so, then moon rock must be silicon based.

also, if these structures are so fantastic and out of this world, why are there no close-up photos of them? those astronauts would have had state-of-the-art photographic equipment with them. if there were 1.5 mile high structures then why are there no close-up pics of these structures towering high above?

like these:

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...YcRARoqSSRj2tQ

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...xegRevPXnzzpRg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ol' Dirty Trixx

Well, if you're so smart why don't you correct me if i am wrong?

---

Okay, they're not real pictures... they've been edited.

those NASA scientists are all on drugs of some sort.


i wish they'd send me some.

i'd be happy with clonazepam or any other drug ending in pam.

oh yeah, and wouldn't the space shuttle blow up once it returned into earth's atmosphere? since space is a vacuum and the shuttle wouldn't get hot or cold in a vacuum, on its return to earth the change in temp at high speed would fuck the shuttle right up, Imo. Or the shuttle would blow up in space cos of the radiation from the sun with no ozone or protective atmosphere. Is there any footage of space shuttles returning and landing safely on the ground?

I reckon that for any kind of extended space travel the craft will have to be solar powered cos we all know that a tank of fuel will only get you so far. Then you gotta work out what the astronuats are gonna survive on when their short supply of oxygen, water and food runs out.

We're all astronauts on this spaceship called earth.

Oh and i bet all those ufo sightings in america is all the work of mad basement scientists wanting to invent a spacecraft themselves. We've seen the evidence of mad scientists in movies like Back To The Future and Homey I Shrunk The Kids.

I don't see the point in space travel unless there is a more humane way of recycling human urine and faeces.

And create oxygen or recycle co2. So far only plants can recycle co2, i think so far it's only plants that are capable of photosynthesis can recycle co2. if they are gonna have greenery on board then the plants will need access to sunlight regularly.

you know what pisses me off most about NASA i wanted to be first to have sex in space


damn you Nowak

And those plants must also be evergreen. nice christmas trees would look quite good.

wait i just got word that it never happed in space still have a chance

I should be planted on the moon when i die. Then NASA can take shots of my moon on the moon. Then record footage of my nekkid body deteriorate and see if a become fruit flies or common house flies or maybe some kind of toxic shit never seen before.

Or they could cut me up send one half of me to the moon and the other half to mars.

Basically the moon landing never happened cos think of how much oxygen an aeroplane can carry and how many hours the oxygen supply on those aeroplanes can last. It can't even make it from london to new zealand without having to stop off at singapore or something to refuel.

"da earf is already in space" - killah priest

What kind of material were the spacesuits made from that it can deflect that kind of radiation?

Even mirrored sunglasses wouldn't be able to handle the sun's rays, i don't think. What were the visors of the astronauts helmets made of? imo, arstrong and co would have got blinded by the sun since the moon has no protective atmosphere.