I hate the prevent it is pretty worthless unless there is one sec left and a team has to throw a 78 yard bomb to win the game, and was it good d by the steelers or was that the game plan to do all those dump-offs?
Printable View
I hate the prevent it is pretty worthless unless there is one sec left and a team has to throw a 78 yard bomb to win the game, and was it good d by the steelers or was that the game plan to do all those dump-offs?
eli is good, but if you look at the class of qb's who came out that year and compare themQuote:
Originally Posted by NickyTooch
rivers>eli
big ben>eli
j.p<eli
any qb>j.p
the waterboy>j.p
what the fuck are you talking about? that homo was clearly not in the end zone and it should never have been called a touchdown on the field to begin with and arizona had atleast two drives stopped because of holding penalties when ben runs around for 20 seconds and no holding gets called.i mean it's pretty ridiculous for steeler fans to act like they don't know what the rest of the world is talking about when we say they gave you the gameQuote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
i've heard a few people on espn today saying that they thought that was a touchdown and can't believe that it was overturn. i guess the steelers have espn on their payroll now, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by portis24
so you are complaing that the cardinals were holding, and the refs threw a flag and penalized them because of it and the steelers didn't hold, but because the play lasted longer than the average play that the steelers should be penalized for holding even though they didn't hold on the play?Quote:
Originally Posted by portis24
please explain why if the steelers have a better pass rusher than the cardinals have a pass blocker, why holding shouldn't be called. is it james harrison's fault that he got by the tackle and he had to hold him from killing kurt warner? you are a retard. you say that the holding penalties stopped the drive. but if the tackle didn't hold james harrison, the sacks would have stopped the drive and kurt warner might be injured.
if you really think the refs wanted the steeler to win, why would they call holding in the end zone. on that play, the steelers got a first down and had a good chance to run out the clock. instead, arizona got 2 points and the ball back.Quote:
Originally Posted by portis24
if the refs wanted the steelers to win, why did they overturn a touchdown and turnover call?
if you're talking about the 100-yard runback then you don't know wtf you're talking about or you're unaware of what the actual rules are. His knees never hit the ground, they hit Fitz. When he got taken down the first thing to touch the ground was his helmet in the endzone. Touchdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by portis24
does the nation really hate pittsburgh this much??? I mean i think thats great but this crying about refereeing and shit....god thats lame. so utterly lame considering Pittsburgh got a bunch of bad penalties.
^which ones?
Quote:
Originally Posted by portis24
the play you are referring to is at the 2:35 mark of this video. the reason why holding wasn't called is because nobody was holding. you can watch it for yourself.
oh right so someone on espn said that it should have been a touchdown ok now i'm convinced what was i thinking fuck espn and the so called expert's they have.now on to the next subject if they are going to call holding on arizona why wouldnt they call it on pitt dockett was getting into the backfield more then anybody last night if ben is rolling around in the pocket and has 10 seconds to throw the ball then someone's holding.since you wbrought up the midget harrison how come he wasn't thrown out of the game for throwing punches oh that's right the ref didn't see it my bad.they called holding in the end zone because he straight tackled the guy you jackass what the hell was he supposed to call i mean if the cardinals player hadnt fallen to the ground they wouldn't have called it.i don't know why you keep saying they overturned a touchdown when u know that cocksucker didnt get inQuote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
see my above post faggot
74 was holding on that play right before he goes out of frame i believe his name is colon but that was a nice tryQuote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
not even close to holding. you know nothing about football.
lol a pitt fan telling someone else they don't know anything about football that's classic and you know that was holding your team needs to hand back those past two trophies because they didn't earn it and everyone knows it
ha haaaaaaaa
colon.
like the bowel.
whatever, fuck it. congrats to your steelers forreal. i hate em', but they won and that's that. i know if my squad won, it wouldn't matter how they won, they won and they won. i know they whooped my teams ass this year. and now they are champions. i'd rather the steelers have 6 rings than the cowboys have 6 rings. i'm not even gonna get into the shit i think was foul in that game, it's pointless IMO. no do overs, pissburgh won. peace to my boy ryan clark.
Ok, so the steelers had some overturned calls against them. But everyone (television, local radio stations, espn radio, basically anyone who isnt a steeler fan) is saying the refs called the game in the steelers favor-Unnecessary personal fouls, a few holds not called on that int return, the last play, etc.
Props to Holmes for his final td catch, and being named MVP. However, if you know anything about football, any speedy receiver could've did the things Holmes did by how bad Rodgers-Cromartie was defending him. Re-watch the game, and see how he backsteps before the ball is even hiked, plays off Holmes for short catches, and even figures a way to being burned on long runs. This dude is terrible. He cost the Cardinals the game in my opinion.