lol 36 thats a friendly
milan still are a better side
gillardinho and sheva = more goals that all your strikers put together next season :)
Printable View
lol 36 thats a friendly
milan still are a better side
gillardinho and sheva = more goals that all your strikers put together next season :)
haha i was waiting 4 u 2 reply. We won the league without a top striker... Milan had 2 or so and didn't, stick that up ur pipe :thumbup:
And Milan still wanted 2 go out and beat Chelsea, but they didn't. Cant see them saying... ah its only a friendly lads, just go and play whatever... hmmm :P a result is a result... last time Chelsea played Milan in the Champs league we won 3-1 and drew 1-1... i can only go by that +)
Thats cos my name isnt actually "36chambers" |(Quote:
Originally Posted by nrw killa bee
Toulouuuuuuuuuuuuse !
does someone know 1. fc kaiserslautern from germany?
that is my favorite team
The Juve top is a complete rip off of the Barca top
What's everyone think bout resisdent lanky boy Peter Crouch at L'Pool???
I Think its a sht signing, Zenden's also abit old on it.
milan>>>chelsea
how many european cups you got?
how many league titles u got?
they have as much money, berlosconi is ridiculously rich but doesnt hog the market like the russian chunt
im glad most people in football hate chelsea now, what was once a good club is now a corporate whore that is the new face of a ruined game
:)
What do u base the "Milan>>>>Chelsea" theory on? History? How many trophies did Milan win last season? How many points were they clear of the league... oh wait ;$
Isnt Berlosconi and Milan just as worse as Abrahmovic and Chelsea? I didnt even know this but £17m for Inzaghi? haha thats as worse as Drogba. £21m for Nesta? Hes very good but not worth £21m. So talking about Chelsea spending all this money on players is stupid, seeing as Milan have spent their fair share too, maybe not as much as Chelsea, but they're definitely taken advantage of their financial situation in the past. Dont Milan president get the money to fund AC Milan via the government? And u sound like a Liverpool fan right now, If i wanted to support a team with history i wouldn't have supported Chelseal. Yay we won shit loads of titles in the 70's and 80's so were a better team than u? Milan have the history... but as a team, Chelsea would beat Milan right now... like they did yesterday. But we'll wait till they meet in the champions league.
Enough talking, over the next 10 years we'll see who wins more league titles, even tho Premier league is by far better than Seria A.
Hey Ronin...
http://img11.photobucket.com/albums/.../bes_sshhh.jpg
Sssshhhh! :D
£21 million for Nesta was a fair price by the time he was transferred. he was young and already excellent.
Thats not the point French, Ronin seems to think Chelsea are the only ones "ruining" Football. But he really has a case of blind rage. But hey, least Chelsea spend they're own money, Milan are just funded by a government. Woohoo.
it's a bit true that Chelsea is ruining the market transfer.
for example, in France, Nantes knows that Lyon wants Toulalan. But, they're waiting the last moment to know how much Lyon will get for the transfer of Essien to Chelsea. And then, they will ask a huge price, just because Lyon is expected to make a lot of money out of this transfer.
Then, Nantes will have to look for another defensive midfield, and they will be asked a huge price for anybody, just because they're supposed to get a lot of money from Lyon for Toulalan, and so on and so on.
Prices are increasing again. And this, for all the clubs, and a lot of them can't afford to buy players anymore. There should be a transfer cap, just like their is a salary cap in the NBA.
A draft system could be useful, but it's impossible, there are too many players, too many clubs. Could be funny though.
I mean, Chelsea puts too much money on the table, for every single player. And they're even not trapped in their own game, coz everybody knows the Russian pays.... so, everybody wants to make money out of him.
Berlusconi(s) have run Milan for years & years, Silvio was only president of Italy last 5 years or so.............so thats not exactly true mister!Quote:
Originally Posted by 36chambers
Inzaghi was the hottest striker in europe for 6 months or so after he signed, left sheva & that in the shade, can't remember that being the case for drogba....Inzaghi is a decent player, just dives A LOT and is offside a lot cos he plays off the shoulder of the last defender.
Chelsea won the league ONE YEAR, got to semi & quarters of champs league, hardly makes them most consistently brilliant european team, if they play same way for 2 or 3 years then yes they are up there but one seasn dont mean shit, look at porto. Were Porto the best team in europe going into last year cos they won the european cup the year after the uefa cup (and prob won portuguese league that year, though not sure)?
Milan's spending was market value at time with a restricted budget, Chelsea just pay stupid money for anyone, unlimited - they bought the title just like blackburn did back in the days spending £200m in 2 years - who else has ever done that?
Real Madrid are the only others up there.........i.e £40m for Figo, megabucks for Zidane & co. as their debts are wiped off every year by the King of Spain or some shit.
Utd (I wish had't) spent £28m on Veron & (glad they did) spent £19m on Ruud Van Horse, but that was due to revenue from marketing, ticket sales & prize money, none of which Chelsea really had in abundance...............all their money was from some bloke out to ruin football with the help of the most annoying, cuntish person in football (stand up peter kenyon)