personal opinion: did we land on the moon?

gav and alcatraz will go far if they start relating their own lack of understanding to ignorance rather than holes in what could be an elaborately set up conspiracy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALCATRAZ

all the footage from the moon landing just looks so god damn fake... maybe its just the old school cameras, i dunno... and didnt they have a vehicle that they operated on the moon, like a regular jeep looking car that they actually drove around in? that shit seems suspect 2 a nigga

---

case in point

if there are differant races of humans nd differant breeds of animals are there differant races of aliens ?o.O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WUnded Fox

well the biggest piece of moon debunkery is the van allen belt. a field of extremely strong cosmic radiation that engulfs the planet. the protection the apollo team had from the van allenbelt was a fraction of what it needed to be in order to keep from frying the astronauts.


if somebody can explain that to me i'd be satisfied.

---

Yeah, youre wrong lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IDI_AMIN

case in point

---

nigga regardless we still aint went back 2 the moon... why not? why not take the moon jeep cruiser out for another spin? hmmm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALCATRAZ

nigga regardless we still aint went back 2 the moon... why not? why not take the moon jeep cruiser out for another spin? hmmm

---

insurance is too damn high

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_i2AnZv6imI...igh_102010.jpg

hahaha at Gavin's "hard evidence images" of earth from space.

hey bro, these are taken from the international space station, yeah, no signs of life.

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/3...in_29_full.jpg

I know what you're thinking, we couldn't possibly get this close to the moon with this kind of lens to be able to see this kind of detail, right?

http://homepage.mac.com/kvmagruder/h...nearth_580.jpg

Yeah, can't really make out any man made structures on earth, from like, whatever 'space station' this photo was taken from. Maybe it's just a photoshop i guess right?

Sigh, NASA really need to stop with these photoshops:

http://wallpapers-diq.org/wallpapers...f_The_Moon.jpg
It's getting pathetic.

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/AA0...E24000B1248CB9

They just keep on taking shots of the areas where they haven't clandestinely erected 1.5 mile high structures (not sure like, how this is possible, considering humans have a shit load of trouble making giant structures a third of that size, on earth, which has much better conditions for constructing mega towers).

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/spac...er/moonsch.jpg

here's some more doctored images from 1972, again, i guess they somehow photoshopped them (in 1972...?) and also kept on catching the side of the moon without the space stations and 1.5 mile high towers.

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/spac...moonwearth.jpg

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/spac.../moonclose.jpg

Here's some more amusing 'images' of 'earth' from 'space', smh.

http://veimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/15842/...321pan_lrg.jpg

look at how nasa has photo shopped these 'lights' onto the earth from space, pathetic. and it's not like they couldn't just turn all the lights off on the moon.... although actually you'd never be able to see lights from space.... um, but if you could then they could just turn them off... or they don't need lights on the moon structures... because the moon is closer to the sun...?

http://veimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/1438/earth_lights_lrg.jpg

http://veimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/2171/ISS003-ESC-5120.jpg

I'm addicted to stupid.

Fox you're a Graphic designer, don't try to ponder science.

Its harder for me to believe technologically we faked it then did it. Putting a man on the moon is a combination of a lot of pretty simple things. 1 part physics, 1 part engineering, 1 part zoom zoom zoom, 1 part silly outfits.

Look, if we were going to fake it we'd have used sexy space gear instead of stuff designed for operation in a vacuum bombarded with radiation and generally unsporting. Why, how shall one hunt the moon man dressed like a deep sea diver. This isn't the hunt for Atlantis its the space race.

http://dad2059.files.wordpress.com/2...pacesuit31.jpg

Why do people always talk like USA only visited the Moon one time? Theres been a whole bunch of missions to the moon, dozens of astros of have visted the moon with little fanfare

smh, can't believe your buying into that moon shit Ghost, you of all people.

All of these 'missions' have been filmed in studio 777.

Haven't you seen this footage:



haha, that video is great.

bump

Smoking a cigarette on the moon:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qzUO62a2vH...circled9vt.png
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/8065/82507800768.gif


http://www.disclose.tv/files/photos/...4f017a547L.jpg
http://www.fortunecity.com/marina/br...2/140c83e0.gif

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...72XAwSy2BwiI8t


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/im.../luna12_04.jpg

sts 80

sts 48

sts 75

STFU

The most retarded thing related to the universe any person or scientist can say is that for life to exist on other celestial bodies you need the same conditions as Earth. It's an overblown guess made on a stupid assumption. Just because no life has been found in the universe doesnt mean it doesnt exist, its a huge fucking universe and its not like every nook and cranny of the Moon and beneath the ground has been explored.

BBC:In the 19th century, many astronomers were convinced the Moon was inhabited by intelligent aliens. We now know that this isn't true. The Moon has no atmosphere, so life couldn't survive there. Just because we couldnt survive on the moon doesnt mean other life can't, assuming all life needs to the same conditions as survival as on Earth is retarded.

Already on Earth you have seen scientists expectations of life to be shattered such as life being discovered deep down in Sulphur pits in Ethiopia i think it was.