its about the notion that white ppl can be 'breed out' or whatever.
that shit's retarded elohle..
put a mix person smack dab in the middle of africa and you'll realize just how white they look.
Printable View
its about the notion that white ppl can be 'breed out' or whatever.
that shit's retarded elohle..
put a mix person smack dab in the middle of africa and you'll realize just how white they look.
we know damn well kids inherit genes that are typically recessive, white people are papered up, and unless we wish to be eurocentric in our thinking and breathing mixed ppl don't look like black ppl either, so idk wtf this whole MY GeN3z are Dawminate you're geN3Z are recessive BS is about cause if the mixed kid is a black female nobody in america will reproduce with her and if its male its gonna reproduce with a degenerate white slab of ape for generations until their kids look like italians.
black ppl arre the ones getting breeded out, get your mind right
your whole argument is eurocentric. what does looking black mean? looking like you?
i get the feeling you define black as being sub-saharan west african.
you know better than i do that africa contains a whole spectrum of hues, features and characteristics. but regardless, you look at obama you see a black man. but to get to the point, even if you don't see a black man, I KNOW YOU DONT SEE A WHITE MAN.
when you see any mixed person do you consider them to be white?
neither do white people. this is what this thread is about. white folks fearing being bred out of being white.
i'm gonna list famous mixed people and ask yourself which genes dominated.
redd foxx? halle berry? maya rudolph? alicia keys? hughes brothers? BOB MARLEY? boris kojoe? charlie baltimore? jason kid? jimi hendrix? jordan sparks? lenny kravitz? lisa bonet? mya? megan goode? malcom x? the rock? sade? shemar moore? smokey robinson? tia and tamara mowry? thandie newton? tina turner? tracy ross? tiger woods? rick fox? naomi cambell? grant hill?
stop trying to make these white folks feel better about their weak genes.
a long time ago a young man once told me a bit of good advice...
"no mercy for the dickless"
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/me...1rzr76.jpg.gif
Jason Kidd is iffy on looking white.
i put him in there to be fair to the recessive.Quote:
Originally Posted by check two
vin diesel is another one.
yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by WUnded Fox
black americans are from west and central africa.They can fool the rest of the world long as new york know. the minute they niggas start looking like lazy bone its a wrap.
i think the whole race concept is stupid so im only arguing in terms that make sense to the ppl im arguing with, in reality there's no difference between black and white americans. its not a good or bad thing, but they're the exact same. Where im from mother fucker sit down different based on what state they're from.
nebraska?Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
The point is you have to look at the evolution of ideas not just what they are now in order to understand them. White Supremacy is not caused by color envy. White supremacy is caused by existing nationalism and xenophobia. Europe was originally tribal. Then it went Clan. Then it went into kingdoms. This was primarily facilitated by the Romans. Before the Romans there were Empires, but they were basically confederations held together by the largest and most influential group. For example, the Persian Empire was dozens of different nations and hundreds of clans and tribes. It stretched through tons of different lands. Greece (I tend to use Greece for examples because its the "starting point" of western culture) was organized into City-States which were basically large scale clan holdings of several thousand families. But these states could be divided into tribes of different groups, and of course individual families. Athens was a confederation of ten Tribes. Rome was a tribe the Latini who eventually unified the local tribes into the City of Rome which eventually used a variety of tactics to organize the Italian tribes and eventually expand into totally diverse regions.
But this "western culture" which is at the root of "white supremacy" was always there. But its not about "white" its about my Tribe. Its just its gotten to the point where the tribes unified and grew to the point there are now nationalities, ethnicities, and races. We're moving towards a singularity. But its not going to be homogeneous its going to be a heterogeneous singularity. The point is that there aren't "whites" and "blacks" that's an illusion created by pseudo science. And we shouldn't forget yellow or even black superiority. Orientals are even more xenophobic then Europeans. And blacks can certainly be xenophobic of outsiders even within the larger "black" community.
We're the same race. We're human. Race is species. You're a human boasting some minor adaptations to the African continent. I'm a human with some adaptations to the European Continent. Here we are in America living as one country. The problem is the politics won't allow us to be one society, one people. Its easier to lump people into heritage groups in order to control them. White people? What the fuck does white mean. There are (what I consider) whites in Britain and (what I consider) whites in Afghanistan. The only definition I can use for a European is our hair isn't black. Some of it is, but we've got brown, and blond, and red, and such. We also have more diversity of eye color. But that's really it. But we can't have scientific precision using categorical data. We need to use quantitative data. What can we use as a measure of diversity?
That's how you classify things. You can argue against categorical data. Quantitative data is different. You can argue how you interpret and order it but you can't really argue with the data just how its used. If I'm dividing people by skin color how the fuck do i do that with all the different skin tones. By the current system I'm in the second or third category depending on sun. I'm not chalky but im not bronze. I'm not particularly freckled. That's something that can be categorized. You can certifiably say whether or not there are spots present. But its possible to argue what shade the spots are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
nah - Millions of us were already here in america
This whole theory of losing melanin because of lack of sunlight is frail.
The whole Jacob story is starting to make more n more sense.
It wasent a story at all....
Stay focused blackman.
Eh, my siblings have white kids, my cousins have white kids, my niece is expecting, some of my friends have white kids.
I don't think white people will go extinct any time soon.
In fact I know they won't since it doesn't even take white people to have a white baby
The difference between races is nothing.
A misplaced gene here or there and you may end up with a child of a completely different skin color.
Kind of makes the whole premise of race seem retarded in general, which it is.
Still, there is no science of origin when it comes to biology.
why are Lions considered the Kings of the Jungle and not Tigers ?
they are both cats - big cats
so why was one singled out ?
Because one's domain stretches universally and the other tends to hunt in certain areas.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
Though that makes neither one or the other necessarily superior, to the human on-looker we apply the transitive theory of "I see less tigers they must also be prey of the lion, they must be weaker than the lion."
Both have found the ability to thrive in the same place, against the same harsh world and even become something to be admired. Likewise a biased spectator will take away certain things in regard to human beings.
I may see race C. engaging in less procreation and relevance to society, RELATIVE to race B. but that doesn't mean they are in any sort of danger.
In fact, contrary to the spectator they really aren't even in conflict.
I say that as someone who lives in reality though, not what ever realm that crazy bitch exists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoarzHeadBoy
excellent post bruhz
haha aight nigga coolQuote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
lions dont live in the jungleQuote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
Haven't been reading this thread, but I can say for a fact I don't call mixed people black because I'm afraid of being bred out of existence (why the fuck would I even care?), I would say they are black because most mixed people identify themselves as black. Sometimes a snake is just a snake man.