Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
lmao - you don't have to be of african descent to be "Black"
just because a person is born in arabia doesn't make him/her non black - the continents,lands, countries don't determine who you are - black people were/ are on every piece of land on this earth - and we are the original occupants of of every piece of earth - even europe - the original Hebrews were black - our identity was stolen - end of discussion
-You're a clown.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
???Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
-I declined this debate because I don't believe "welfare should be abolished". If you wish, I can provide my own premise, but you would probably agree with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trismegistos
Your profile says that you are AGAINST the "government providing welfare to the poor".Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
Throw up your premise, I can only take a look at it.
-African-Americans and mixtures thereof are descendants of African slaves. This can be proven, traced, it is documented, and a DNA analysis will support this claim (unless someone thinks they are of African decent and actually isn't). The people I mentioned- though having similar characteristics like dark skin, are not anthropologically "Congoid". "Black" is used in this topic to signify "of African decent" of the "recent" type- otherwise the term would include every person on Earth and the argument would be completely void on either side.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Historical data in the bible, like geneologies, can be compared to those written by other cultures, and are generally not questioned because the claims are not fantastic, based on faith or myth, and are generally considered to be as accurate as possible for that time. The name "Hebrew" is said to come from "Heber"- a great grandson of Shem, from which the name "Semite" derives.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Is this question missing something?Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-I have read many books, many apocrypha, scientific data, research, and opinions of scholars on both sides. Generally the information provided by people supporting the "black Hebrew" myth are easily discredited with elementary school science, while the findings of the "cons" are logical, systematic, and supported by science as well as scripture.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-In this case, anthropologically speaking- Congoid (formerly Negroid), or having the physical traits of Sub-Saharan Africans.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-There are some very ignorant whites who believe that, but scientifically speaking there are clear racial distinctions between the different classifications.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-You say "white people named us that" then you adhere to the white designation. I don't adhere to this designation in ignorance, rather the scientific term. Antrhopologically we are all descendants of Africa. Arabs are not black because they have dark skin. They are Semitic because of their anthropoligical, geographical, and linguistic characteristics. They lack the standard physical characteristics that seperate Congoid from, say, Australoid or proto-Caucasoids which are generally as dark skinned as Congoids, have most of the same physical characteristics, but lack some skeletal, cranial, and hair features of the Congoids.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-You're speaking for ignorant whites, and people who adhere to those beliefs. I'm speaking of anthropological reality. Feeding into this "lumping" of gene pools out of ignorance, or out of searching for your place in history is one and the same. If one must resort to "caring" at all about racial classifications, one must do so scientifically or you are doing the same as the racist whites. Racist whites took something from African-Americans, and now African-Americans who believe the Hebrews were black are taking something away from blacks who are proud of their ancestry. It's a vicious cycle that is stopped through education, awareness, and cultural emersion. The main reason I am opposed to the "black Hebrew" notion- besides it's lack of scientific evidence- is that I know the history of the theory. I know how it evolved from association by occurence to association by race, and I know it is based on a lack of pride due to a lack of education on our own history. I don't see the sense of pride in being "Hebrew" over being "black" and I prefer my own ancestry to this imagined one (not that there's anything wrong with being of Hebrew decent).Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-I am, but that is not to say that I am for abolishment of the system rather than restructuring of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trismegistos
welfare fucked the hood up in a way. i read some book about it. it messed up niggas work ethic
-This is my premise, somewhat. "The current welfare system amounts to institutionalized ghettoization" or something like that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Mic Tyson
I am for Socialized social programs, but not welfare. A Socialized Healthcare system, education system, and employment system (help with placement and re-education as needed) would eliminate the need for welfare. I am against welfare because it subsidizes poverty without ever seeking to eliminate it.
your motherQuote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
No Stupid - we are not just descendants of african slaves
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
trying so hard to be smart - trying so hard to be right
black people are not limited to the african continent you fool
lmao - nigga shut up - you don't know how stupid you soundQuote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
give us the historical data on the talking snake that made eve take of the tree of good and evil
you talk too muchQuote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
no the question isn't missing anything - you are thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
what you have read and researched is bullshit -Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
lmao - nigga shut upQuote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
sub saharan africans lol
so now they are limiting us to the "sub" sahara - and this fool is going right along with them
so any one who is labeled black in america, originated in sub sahara africa ?
get off that strong drug son
the fact is that, you shouldn't scientifically speak at allQuote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
fuck your scientific terms
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
arabia is the name of a place and "arab" is not a race ............dumb ass
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
nigga fuck all those oids and shit
and fuck the way "caucasiods" wanna label us
they been separating the family for many moons
and rewriting history to put themselves in our place
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
you're just another dumb "scientific evidence" needing nigga with no knowledge of self swimming in the wrong information
-You're right, but you get my point. I know your parents taught you bigger words than that...Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Then you have no idea what the word means. You defined it as what white people call "all of us", and you accept that meaning. I don't. And, right, I'm the one that "tries" to sound smart by calling people "stupid"... welcome to the playground kiddies!Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-WTF are you talking about???Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-You're so smart. You must have made statements so vague we just can't see them...Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Oh, thanks for your educated and properly researched response! I'm sure everyone appreciates your insight...Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Again, you are sooo smart. Do you even know what that meanst? I'm going "right along with THEM"? You mean the same "them" who label all non-whites black, ie. YOU?Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-At risk of throwing pearls to the pigs, I attempt to educate the ignorant- Sub-Saharan African was chosen as a geographical home for certain physical characteristics now collectively known as Congoid (ie. Congo). This was done to ensure a standard in racial classifications relating to geographical origin, ie. Caucasoid= Caucus region or Eurasia, Mongoloid= Mongolia, Australoid= Australia. See how simple that was children?Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Sounds like my two year old when he can't get his point across... waaaahhhh!Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-You're so smart, but I can only agree with you on half of that statement- Arabia is not a place. Arab is not a race, rather an ethnic group with varying degrees of racial representation depending on the origin, but very similar cultures all of which can trace their geneology to the original Arab tribes. Saudi Arabia is a "place", but is only SAUDI Arabia, ie. the Arab lands ruled by the House of Saud.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Your ignorance keeps you in a place of ignorance. You do very well to ensure your place amongst the ignorant, and you are a great representative of the ignorant. Good job buddy :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
-Right, I'm dumb for relying on scientific evidence. Any true knowledge is justified by science. Those who reject science do so because they are convinced in their ignorance prior to being convinced that facts should support fantastic claims. Ignorance is an easier path for you because you don't have to think, and when time comes to explain your position you can always rely on anger and rage and four letter words to express your discontent with thinking... tadada! fuck you! prrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaa! wonk wonk! You're stupid! waaaaaaaaaahhhhh! Fuckin kids...Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
Your profile says your against social programs?Quote:
Originally Posted by WuLatino- MANGANI
I can't exactly debate solely US welfare when I'm based in Australia and my experience of social programs is completely different to yours.
Think globally and re-word it to cater for an international need for social programs and then we can debate.
"Every clinically and legally sane, law abiding citizen should have the right to bear arms".Quote:
Originally Posted by Trismegistos
i'm curious what everyone's definition of "black" is?