Fuck Jesus

and fuck his donkey too

one who says ''fuck Jesus'' is stupid. and everybody that curse God of any name or form.


1 UNIVERSAL GOD.......


please dont hate

Fuck the black Jesus. Cunt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crack Killz

it's first "Amendment"

funny how you say you have something that gives you the right to criticize any belief when you don't even know how to spell it.

thats weird huh?

and for the record, I'm not Christian, I chose a different route.

---

For some reason I always misspell that word. Sorry, but I don't consider the Wu-Tang forum the highest priority in my life, so I don't always check my spelling. I'm not writing a fucking term paper on here. It doesn't mean I don't know how to spell the word.

And since when does knowing how to spell something have anything to do with the right it grants me?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Humanface Huggah

he also taught that he had divine knowledge of the imminent apocalypse and would lead anyone who followed him into eternal bliss (the "kingdom of heaven"). check the 4 gospels. check historians of the period for confirmation. he was that crazy loon you see next to the corner bodega, except with a much bigger ego.

---

well wouldn't loving your neighbor and loving god save the human race from destruction?

doesn't sound that crazy to me. Jesus never claimed to be God in Flesh. that label was placed on him centuries later. why you beefin with jesus anyway?

huggah i think you are a agent for real. of the devil not the gov.

1. play by the white mans rules
2. denounce your beliefs
3 fuck jesus
4. white folks are good at theft/murder/rape and thats a good thing.

you are evil son

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by STYLEMASTERR

well wouldn't loving your neighbor and loving god save the human race from destruction?

doesn't sound that crazy to me. Jesus never claimed to be God in Flesh. that label was placed on him centuries later. why you beefin with jesus anyway?

huggah i think you are a agent for real. of the devil not the gov.

1. play by the white mans rules
2. denounce your beliefs
3 fuck jesus
4. white folks are good at theft/murder/rape and thats a good thing.

you are evil son

---

As soon as you can prove the devil exists, that statement might have some weight.

1. What is playing by white man's rules? Maybe if you stop viewing things through a racial lense you'll understand the world better.

2. I don't see him denouncing any of his own beliefs. He apparently denounces yours though.

3. Agreed.

4. And you totally twisted Huggah's words. All he's saying in that topic is that the geographic attributes of Europe worked to the advantage of the people there and worked well evolutionary in furthering the power of those nations. It has nothing to do with your simplistic concepts of "good" and "evil".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

As soon as you can prove the devil exists, that statement might have some weight.

1. What is playing by white man's rules? Maybe if you stop viewing things through a racial lense you'll understand the world better.

2. I don't see him denouncing any of his own beliefs. He apparently denounces yours though.

3. Agreed.

4. And you totally twisted Huggah's words. All he's saying in that topic is that the geographic attributes of Europe worked to the advantage of the people there and worked well evolutionary in furthering the power of those nations. It has nothing to do with your simplistic concepts of "good" and "evil".

---

1
2
3
4

are all huggahs quotes not mine. #4 you just put words in his moputh he never said anything near that.

ask him. he knows what he said.
and as far as the devils goes.....don't be so literal with your understanding.

U mad?

loving a serial killer.....well if we all followed the golden rule there wouild be no serial killers.

to to rebut...
the way you love a killer is to get him some help. by:
1. bringing him to justice so he may face his sins.
2. attonement.
3. rehabilitation
4. forgiveness

Jesus 'the son of god' was just chinese whispers from the sun god (Horus to the ancient Egyptians). You can't fuck the sun, you'd burn your dick.

what better defines a religion: its source or its followers?

Its lack of sources and its abundance of followers. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are the most aggressive offenders.

ah i see, the Bible didn't footnote or use citations...

The Bible does not prove anything. Thats the problem with it. im not knocking it, but the whole basis is to prove there was a got, and unfortunately it really does not offer any concrete evidence.

to me it sounds like you think the whole basis for the Bible should be to prove that there is a God.

unfortunately for many people the Bible is a lot different than you'd think it is, i think that's why a lot of people think just reading the Bible should get you to convert. in truth it isn't something it isn't.

what, they talk about killing in the Bible!? THERE IS NO GOD! kind of thing. not saying that's you or anyone, but you get my drift.

the idea of believing in God is more of a philosophical issue than a scholarly issue though, as believing in God is always about faith. it just depends how rationally you base this faith.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koolish

to me it sounds like you think the whole basis for the Bible should be to prove that there is a God.

unfortunately for many people the Bible is a lot different than you'd think it is, i think that's why a lot of people think just reading the Bible should get you to convert. in truth it isn't something it isn't.

what, they talk about killing in the Bible!? THERE IS NO GOD! kind of thing. not saying that's you or anyone, but you get my drift.

the idea of believing in God is more of a philosophical issue than a scholarly issue though, as believing in God is always about faith. it just depends how rationally you base this faith.

---

Religious faith has nothing to do with rationality. Theologians and apologists just try to apply rationality and logic when inventing new reasons to be irrational and illogical.

Whats dangerous - is how we have a world full of Christians that are using the powers of the Universe to make "Bible Prophecy" become a reality with the power of thought. The original "occultists" that re-translated this book knew of this: now have 1/3 of the world thinking "praying" about the final events of the bible, which is a scary thought.

The power of creation combined with billions of thoughts is not a good thing when many believe we will destroy ourselves - is "Jesus" suppose to be made manifest as well with this thought process? Will the majority of white Christians manifest a "white" Jesus? Or will the Creator send another Master being?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by V4D3R

Whats dangerous - is how we have a world full of Christians that are using the powers of the Universe to make "Bible Prophecy" become a reality with the power of thought. The original "occultists" that re-translated this book knew of this: now have 1/3 of the world thinking "praying" about the final events of the bible, which is a scary thought.

The power of creation combined with billions of thoughts is not a good thing when many believe we will destroy ourselves - is "Jesus" suppose to be made manifest as well with this thought process? Will the majority of white Christians manifest a "white" Jesus? Or will the Creator send another Master being?

---

I'm not sure what any of this is supposed to mean but the real threat is that we have a world full of religious people who have possession of nuclear weapons and many of them literally believe the end times prophecies of centuries past.

That's what's entirely frightening.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

I'm not sure what any of this is supposed to mean but the real threat is that we have a world full of religious people who have possession of nuclear weapons and many of them literally believe the end times prophecies of centuries past.

That's what's entirely frightening.

---

thats exactly what i was saying in a way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Religious faith has nothing to do with rationality. Theologians and apologists just try to apply rationality and logic when inventing new reasons to be irrational and illogical.

---

i'm glad you promote having no bias.

Rationality and faith are antonyms. Faith is not rational. Faith is basis-less, its putting all your eggs into a basket you aren't sure really exists, and have no evidence of its existence besides heresay.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koolish

i'm glad you promote having no bias.

---

Never promised that.

But if you like, I'll try to word it more neutral.

Faith by its very nature is not rational. It's accepting something without evidence. And what theology and religious apology does is take a faith-based premise and use rational thought to come up with rational explanation as to why one should believe this. In the end, it is still empty because the basic premise ("my god is real," "this is how god wants us to act," "this is the evidence for god," "this is how you reconcile an all-loving god with the notion of evil") is unprovable through any empirical observation.

not everyone requires empirical observations for a belief, do you feel this is an unintelligent notion?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Koolish

not everyone requires empirical observations for a belief, do you feel this is an unintelligent notion?

---

In general, yes.

Of course there are exceptions, but most can be traced back to empirical evidence. You can make accurate predictions about things that will happen in your day to day life or how people will behave without conducting a study, but it's not really faith since you had to experience that event or human behavior first to make the prediction. There are also useful items of what you might call "faith", such as an optimistic state of mind in order to accomplish a task.

But as far as a concept as big as God, especially if you're implying that the Biblical god is real, then I have to say, accepting that without empirical evidence is unintelligent.