Because I dont look/act like Gary Coleman wanting to hang with Willis and the big older dogs.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaShaolinAssassin
Printable View
additionally the amalgamation of science, psychology, history, politics, sociology etc. which is somehow fluently integrated into conversation, is ridiculous.
some of the above might be linked, maybe all of the above.
but the extent to which people here state a scientific "fact" and from there go on to explain the entirety of history and then go on to explain current societal and political ills, is illogical and bizarre.
Regards,
You can find "research" to support any argument, from conspiracy theories to this.
When I look at a piece of information I want to know if it's been peered reviewed, and adheres to a strict set of scientific guidelines for experimentation, otherwise I'm not buying it. This way, subjectivity and bias in data are eliminated a best as is possible.
There is a lot of misinformation on the internet from so-called scientific sources that haven't been exposed to this type of scrutiny. So unless I can see that the information presented is credible in the way I described I won't be paying it much attention. In fact, whenever I want to get up to date on a particular issue I always go through the university I attend to find published work (ie peer reviewed etc) on the topic.
Furthermore, a great number of KTL posters stay losing because they are unable to comprehend whether a source is credible or not beyond their radical opinion. It is great to look at all points of view on a topic, I am not disputing that. However, when someone strongly and often rudely argues their case, citing unproven "scientific" data combined with conspiracies about the government etc I don't see how it can be taken seriously.
For me, it isnt even that.
Ive taken the time (and it wasnt even wasted time, because some of these sources provide credible information) to read most of the 'research' posted.
Unfortunately, from this 'research' wild conclusions are drawn which do not logically follow the information presented in sources.
They idea of sourcing material is to back up an argument which you are making, as oppose to outlining 'facts' and then going off on a tangent about what you 'think' is scientifically correct.
All the actual 'research' which stylemasterr posted is acceptable i feel.
However, he used this in order to lay the foundation for his subsequent argument, instead of provided supporting evidence.
This is a common trend with his posts i find.
He will outlay 'facts' which seem acceptable, and then launch into a flawed, quasi scientific philosophical argument, which minimally references the original source.
And this isnt even the norm in KTL.
Style is going far beyond the general standard of 'proof' here.
Normally people write paragraphs of opinion and post at the end "if you dont believe me, look here *insert several webpages*.
Whats more, why havent you called me rahbart?
what is the plan?
im at uni...
when are you leaving?
should i get home some time soon?
fanx.
Soon my friend. I understand what you mean. It's all about taking information out of context. This often happens when people don't understand the scientific terms. None of that information presented proves Style's point.
and VAD3R, I have no qualms with you but you did exactly what am talking about in a previous post, the one where you mentioned fluoride.
enswur duh phfohn plase.
calcified flouride inhibited testicular glands.
So you dont believe there is an elite agenda to kill off some 80% of the planet so be it...
but I presented some facts on how this directly affects the pineal gland.
If you dont want to acknowledge the possibility that some insecure powerful men do feel threatened to lose out a lot with things like a black president that might do something about Reparations or actually do meaningful things for people of color...thats on you.
Aids - fluoride - syphilis - what else man? What the fuck else is fucking us up that is man-made death?
just stopping by to check what's new and damn ... this thread is good
see ya in a month!
fuck yall. you ain't black so you will never "get it".
why does it even matter to any of yall?
i mean really yall aussies don'/t even know any black people. why do you care?
TSA included you uncle tom oreo cracker worshipping onion armpit african reject. stay suckin those redneck dicks. stay indoors and get you vitamin D that way you fuckin loser.
pat idk what to tell you man. i started my style career talkin this same shit.
see whites and savagery vol 1 & 2 , my 1st threads.
and said "if a white person can accept the fact that i feel this way we can be the best of friends"
i have had brotherly friendship with white guys but will tell them in a min that crackers a fucked up and i have to know them in order to trust them.
i thought that's where we were. a mutual understanding that style thought whites were biologically inferior to people of color, but have the same capacity for greatness as anyone else.
no?
ain't that a kick in the nuts
i feel like befriending a white person is like having a pet cobra. if it bites you, you can't be mad at anyone but yourself.
ouch
fuck it.
it's a subject of maturity.
that's what's wrong.
you and pat said you read those articles.
i don't, they're fuckin stupid can come from places like TheBlackNubianAlliance, which is the last place i would send my kids to actually learn something
therefore, KTL posters get frustrated when the argue with me because i present actual facts that we both actually know. nothing elaborate and nothing far fetched but by making it clear that im not gonna read pathetic articles written by people that are internally hurt asserting their false superiority as a means to redeem a shattered and empty sense of self worth it kills them inside more cause ALL THEY CAN DO is post these articles.
it's pathetic.
really, really, really pathetic.
between that, stylemasters current state of anger, and sunny winters secondaries is easy to see why KTL is pure garbage.
all i do is come on here, present truths that all posters know and they have a hard time arguing it so they start talking about how africans smell while trying to assert black people are a super natural race of superior people, which they're not, they're poor.
so as i was saying. China engages in the world system, the only evidence presented against me is the fact that China has a lot of ethnicities but they're overwhelmed by the han chinese population.
those ethnicities were conquered by the han chinese and are under their domain till this day.
china also has a history of imperial dominance over vietnam, korea, tibet, various Gobi desert or people of western china, and mongolia, which till this day the majority of mongol land and people are artificially place behind chinese boarders.
you mad?
Peace.
This is to those who are in the know. You know who I'm talking to.
Pay very close attention to whats going on here. We have original people, black people, people of color, non-whites who are showing serious signs of being sick.
Because the devil taught him how to eat the wrong foods.
He likes the devil because the devil gives him nothing.
The statement above is very important....those who know it and understand know why.
Look how he big ups white people but continues to put down original (black) people. He want to be a part of the devil's social equality but the devil will never let that happen.
He's being used as a tool and also a slave.
What does a person when they don't love themselves? The destroy self and everything that reminds them of self!
Why did Musa have a hard time civilizing the devil......?
The 85% believe in the 10% on face value.
Anything black, he's against. Anything white, he's for.
It's not about truth. It's not about freedom, justice, or equality. It's about him being other than his own self.
He's going under the study from 35-50 years to try and learn and do like the colored man hoping that he'll be able to take the heads of 4 gods wanting free transportation to the vatican to see his unrighteous brother.