:stroke:
Printable View
Hah, monkey nature, thats funny.
Since the other thread got closed, ill bring respond to the gravity thing since I didnt get a chance to before.
My point with that is, where do you draw the line in science? You except rational college educated scientists when it comes to gravity (I know it was newton, not the point) but you say no to evolution although all signs point to it? Do you just pick and choose what science you want to believe in depending on if it clashes with your beliefs? How does that work? Do you think fossils are real? Dinosaurs? Ect?
I respect scientists but not all scientists. "Western" scientists strive to disprove the existence of what they consider "super natural."
The theory of evolution doesn't clash with my beliefs. I just don't believe some of the explanations-or theories that are currently excepted by the mainstream.
Gravity, Physics, Mathamatics. I've studied all these things. These are laws that govern our universe, yet the theory of evoultion wants to bend these laws that govern are natural world.
Now try answer this question from the previous thread:
What effect does gravity play in the theory of evolution?
haha, will it ever end?
i respect the fact that vader actually put what he thinks out there.
instead of constantly saying evolution is wrong for this reason or that, say what you actually think.
your prepared to give criticism, why not let others constructively criticise what you think?
i understand that this thread will be met with more irrelevent shit about gravity and monkeys.
i think we should all give up and let it die, proponents of evolution have said all they want to.... and vader has said what he wanted to about the matter,
yet slippy your still yet to say anything, and id have to say thats how it will stay.
let this shit die.
I'm not trolling, I've shared enough of my knowledge on the subject in the past. Experience tells me people can't handle the truth.
i'm ready for the truth so give it. how were human beings created?
Hah, I think you are trying to pick apart an argument that is not being made. Like I said before, I am relating the two in terms of scientific theories accepted by scientists. Its like yea apples and oranges can't be compaired on the micro scale because they are two different things, as evolution and gravity are, but on the macro scale of things apples and oranges are both fruits, as evolution and gravity both pertain to modern science. My point to what Im getting at is I think you dont believe evolution because it doesnt fit your pre-existing beliefs.
That is to suggest, say you started with a blank slate. You knew nothing of the creation of humans from any direction. And someone posed to you two options, those being...the explanation of however you believe we got here, (which idk since you dont seem to be willing to reveal it), and the theory of evolution backed by most credible scientists all over the world, and you had to choose. In an honest manor, I think you would pick evolution.
Just like most people that believe in religion (or some sort of system as such) today, they were brought up on it, it was implanted in them as truth from a young age, and nothing can come before that. And when something like evolution contradicts what you believe, in this case how we got here, it is tossed aside as bullshit, because if you were to believe it, your world as you know it would come crumbling down.
Does that answer your question?
(P.S. I had TWO bananas today, they were really good)
the truth is out there
You mean animals and plants? It's bullshit.
No you didn't answer my question because:
You lack the ability to think critically.
What effect does gravity play in the theory of evolution? What role does it play on the the evolutionary fitness of an organism?
bananas are great.