What U Won't Hear In Mainstream Western News(Whats Really Goin On Libya)

[LONDON!]

this is what the evil devil phony's running the system are really doing in libya, sarkozy treats muslim brothers and sisters in france like third class citizens, cameron dosen't give two flying shits about the poor in england, he took my little nieces ema(a grant to help kids to buy tools for college whop are coming from deprived backgrounds) away and is socially cleansing off uni's over here and other shit, obama spends billions, trillions on imperialist wars abroad that only benefit him and his evil circle of devils but can't spend a couple of millions on fixing up inner city schools in the USA, but would rather spend more money on building prisons, that says it all, you see what i'm saying, so it justs cracks me up(if it wern't a sick in the head pyschotic fruitcake joke) that heads would believe these evil piece of shits would give two flying fucks about muslim brothers and sisters a billion miles away in libya, you get what i'm saying, this is what is really going on, this shit is about oil and the system 100% controlling it under there terms as usual, they have murdered and assassinated gaddafi's innocent family members for no reason and are targeting gaddafi for assasination because he stood up to these punk devils for so long and are murdering civillians for collective punishment in the libyan capital tripoli

from www.globalresearch.ca by the great and revolutionary cynthia mckinney

'NATO bombs civilians!': Report from Tripoli
by grtv
As NATO attacks continue in Libya, former US congresswoman and presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney went to the country on a non-governmental fact-finding mission to see what exactly is going on in the war-torn country.

Cynthia McKinney believes the bombardments of Libyan cities and other measures taken by NATO, causing civilian casualties, represent the idea of “collective punishment”.

“NATO is preventing shipments of fuel, food and medicine to come in. There have been efforts to get medicine into the country that have been denied by NATO. It is impossible to go on any street and miss the huge queues – sometimes three or four deep – that go on and on, as they queue up to get gasoline from the service station,” McKinney says.

McKinney also told RT how universities and other civilian facilities are being bombed by NATO troops.

“I don’t know why NATO is choosing these targets, but these are civilian targets. Whenever you target a civilian population, you’re committing a crime,” she added.

[LONDON!]

the colonialists are back, fuck the system

from www.globalresearch

African Leaders Demand Halt to NATO Bombing Campaign in Libya






Global Research, June 15, 2011
Bloomberg News

Email this article to a friend
Print this article

0
digg

137
Share


African leaders today demanded an immediate end to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's bombing campaign in Libya and called for the African Union and United Nations to take the lead in reaching a political solution.

"We have not voted for a substitute for bombing of one group by the other," South Africa's Foreign Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane told reporters in New York, referring to the UN resolution authorizing military action against Libya leader Muammar Qaddafi's regime, which her government supported. "All forms of military intervention and bombing must stop now."

Nkoana-Mashabane and ministers of Mali, Mauritania, Uganda and the Republic of Congo, which formed the AU's Ad Hoc Committee on Libya, expressed their concern about the NATO bombing campaign to the UN Security Council. Adoption of a draft statement demanding a "complete end to violence and all attacks against and abuses of civilians" was blocked by the U.S. and other Western nations.

"This was a meeting for expressions of frustration," said Ambassador Nestor Osorio of Colombia, a Security Council member. Ambassador Jose Moraes Cabral of Portugal, also a council member, said Uganda's Foreign Minister Ruhakana Rugunda suggested the NATO intervention amounted to "going back to colonialism" in Africa.

Call from Russia, China

The meeting in New York followed a statement today by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a security alliance led by China and Russia and including the former Soviet states of Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan [and Kazakhstan], urging an end to the NATO campaign. "Domestic conflicts and crises have to be regulated exclusively by peaceful means, through political dialogue," the group said in Astana, Kazakhstan, where it is holding a summit.

South Africa's President Jacob Zuma was more direct yesterday in Cape Town, saying the UN resolution authorizing military action was "being abused for regime change, political assassinations and foreign military occupation."

[Mauritania's Foreign Minister Hamady Ould] Hamady called for an "immediate humanitarian pause" in the fighting and expressed the AU's "surprise and disappointment at the attempts to marginalize the continent in the management of the Libyan conflict."

Britain's Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant said a precondition of a halt to the NATO bombing was a cessation of attacks on civilians by the Qaddafi regime.

"The ball is in Qaddafi's court," Lyall Grant said.

--Editors: Steven Komarow, Terry Atlas

[SL33]

NATO is performing genocide over there, that's common knowledge.

[Shogah]

In the beginning there was a lot of media coverage but now there is nothing.

That is the sign that they won. When you persuade everyone that what you doing is ok.

[soul controller]

;/ just gets worse and worse,. sad times.

[LONDON!]

In the beginning there was a lot of media coverage but now there is nothing.

That is the sign that they won. When you persuade everyone that what you doing is ok.

and you know this

@soul controller
thats what i'm saying, its a fucked up planet

[june181972]

Pardon me for quoting myself. Content is better understood in context of original thread.

A shrude and effective political tactic is to assassinate someone's character before you physically assassinate them. Then there is no outcry from the masses, and the perpetrator does not lose in the court of public opinion. Create a negative enough perception of a person, then their murder is "justified".



In late 2009 early 2010, there were significant racial riots going on in Italy. Many African immigrants were being attacked in Italy. Flood a country that seemingly did not want Blacks with Blacks.

Muammar Qadhafi was instrumental in forming the African Union, he also served as President of said organization. Why an African Union? So the mineral and natural wealth of Africa would first go to serve African people, instead of countries like Russia and China exploiting that wealth and making it look good by throwing a few crumbs to a selected few African people.

Muammar Qadhafi only had 1 so-called "rant" at the UN. During his first and only trip to the UN he challenged the structural legitimacy and equality of the UN. The United States, Great Britain, France, China, and Russia make up the permanent members of the UN Security Council. Basically, their votes are the only ones that always count when it comes time for those 180 or so "United" Nations to make a collective decision. Exposing hypocrisy = a "rant"?

It is interesting that Muammar Qadhafi is accused of murdering his own people, because he came into power via a coupe that had ZERO bloodshed. And if he is killing these great masses of people, where are any of these mass graves?

Why would a man be accused of being an international warmongerer years after he has eliminated all of his weapons of mass destruction?

When Qadhafi came into power, he put out the U.S. and the U.K. and took back control of Libya's oil. He nationalized that oil to benefit the masses of Libyan people. This significantly reduced homelessness, improved and made more available medical attention and education. Infrastructure, houses, hospitals and schools were built. These "socialist" tendencies put Qadhafi at odds with some "fanatical" Muslims.

Some of the first countries to rush to take military action against Qadhafi, were the same ones that had working international business and political realationships with him. Italy, Germany, Denmark, Canada. Qadhafi was friends with none other than Tony Blair. He even financially backed the campaign of French President Nicolas Sarcozi. Qadhafi used Libya's oil (which needs less refining than many other forms of crude) to benefit Libyan people before it benefitted Europe.

Oil (black gold) = Money = Power. Is the phrase, "The Love of Money is the Root of all Evil" too "hocus-pocus"? Or are many conflicts truly based on greed?

Did anyone bother to poll the Libyan people, or have a referendum on Muammar Qadhafi, before they made the claims that the people no longer like or approve of his leadership? These rebels that the western media seems to be rooting for; what have they done for the Libyan population that so much trumps Qadhafi's 40 plus years of service? And who in the world is funding them?

[june181972]

Muammar Qadhafi is often portrayed as "crazy, senile, unintelligent, violent dictator"

This man took over a nation without killing anyone, remains in power for over 40 years, improved the economy, education and infrastructure of this nation.

Qadhafi is an international economic & political power player that looks out for his nation 1st, then Africa as a whole.
The greatest and wisest of warriors wins his battles without ever physically engaging his opposition.
1969, Muammar Qadhafi's bloodless coupe

[LONDON!]

thats exactly it june

some more humanatarian concept from the imperialist evil system's point of view

from www.globalresearch.ca


Breaking News: PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE: NATO Bombed Libya's Nasser University
Campus B of Al Fatah

by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya






Global Research, June 12, 2011

Email this article to a friend
Print this article

0
digg

1736
Share


The NATO war against Libya is not a humanitarian endeavour. It is a blatant war of aggression and a violation of international law.

War crimes are being committed by NATO.

Hospitals and universities have been bombed. Civilian infrastructure has been brutally destroyed.

Recently Tripoli's Nasser University (Campus B of Al Fatah University) was bombed. University staff were injured and killed. There is no justification for this.

What NATO is doing is taking advantage of internal divisions to destroy Libya as a country.

The unspoken objective is to destroy Libya's economy and to prevent it from developing as a nation-state. This is why schools and universities, hospitals, shipyards, factories, not to mention residential areas, have been the target of NATO bombings.

Readers are informed in advance that the photographic evidence that follows is graphic and disturbing.

These photographs were taken by Mohammed Al-Alam, a student at Nasser University. The photographs were directly forwarded to Global Research.


Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Global Research, June 12, 2011


Photographs: NATO bombings of Nasser Campus B, Al Fateh University, Tripoli. Copyright Global Research 2011

click on this link for more graphic photos, warning though, theirs pictures of dead brothers and sisters in there too

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25221

[june181972]

Peace LONDON!

Cynthia McKinney: "99% of what is appearing is a result of psy-ops"
Responding to media claim that Libyan troops have been given Viagra to help them rape and control women.

As far as things like access to food and housing and education and social services, Libya is number 1 out the 53 countries in Africa. This according to United Nations observations.
Can those "rebels" do that for the Libyan people?

Brother Leader Muammar Qadhafi, this man is 1 of the great leaders of his time, has a vision of a United Africa with its own currency backed by GOLD.
Think about that. The U.S. Dollar and the British Pound and the French Franc have slowly but surely been on the decline since the world left the gold and silver standard. Imagine the international power shift if mineral and resource rich Africa had it own form of currency and the precious hardware to back it.
Those death-dealing, slave-mongering French would lose their stranglehold on 12 or so "post-colonial" Nations in Africa.

Those punk-ass Saudi Arabians, who obviously bow down to America before they bow to Allah, only accept the Dollar for their oil. This being the case since 1971. This is crucial being that they are the world number 1 oil producer.

Brother Leader Muammar Qadhafi was 1 of those that spear-headed the installation of Africa's own satellite communications system. This also cut deep into the pockets of Europe.
(RASCOM: Regional African Satellite Communication Organization)

A Gold backed currency versus a fiat Dollar that is $14.3 trillion in debt. Legally, America cannot borrow any more money unless it raises it's debt ceiling.
In April, Standard & Poor's put a negative tag on the previously positive debt outlook for the U.S. A "negative" dollar would literally rock the international economic foundation.

All this while republicans and democrats play politics on where to get the money to reduce the debt. Why no corporate tax increase? Why no tax increase on that super rich top 2,3,4% or whatever it is. Don't tell me shit about "patriotism"

NATO and the U.S. and Europe want Brother Leader Muammar Qadhafi dead not because he's a bumbling idiot, like the intellectually lazy, sheep-headed people have been lead to believe. But rather because he is 1 of the greatest threats to western hegemony.

[LONDON!]

thats what i'm saying, that article broke it down in a nutshell, there was a one million pro gadaffi rally in tripoli a couple of days ago, the western news media blacked this story out

the system has being putting out fake propaganda psy-ops stories on libya and gadaffi from the beginning, its all bullshit. about gadaffi giving out viagra to his troops so they can rape, its all bullshit

that statement about theirs gonna be a bloodbath in behghazi was said by a libyan goverment guy in scandinavia or sumthin, its fake shit, gadaffi didn't say that shit

this civil war would have ended long time ago, if gadaffi would have entered benghazi, they would have just targeted and legitimately, the rebels, they are former establishment members and terrorists, its legitmate for the goverment to defend the country from an attempted coup, the rebels would have left benghazi and the goverment troops would have left the remaining civillians alone, there would have been no bloodbath and i'm not a warmonger, the way i see it now, is that they should have dealt wit there beef diplomatically, but from when they got nato involved, they became traitors

everybody knows the system dosen't give two flying shits about brothers and sisters in libya, you see what i'm saying, thats why nato have murdered around 800 innocent civillians in libya already, in there evil eyes and devil logic, they see it as collateral damage, i mean that says it all, in there quest to steal libya's oil.

nato just want to bomb libya back to the stone ages like the system did in iraq, its collective punishment just so they can divide and rule and control the oil and this is who the rebels are siding wit, them terrorists are coming back from jihad wars in other places where theirs legitimate resistance against the system and its proxy's and then the other side of the coin of the legitimate local resistance element is the fruitcake terrorist shit, the otherside of the coin, but the point is, these terrorists who are apart of the rebel crew have seen the systems devilshment in places like iraq and so on and so on and they still want to side wit the system, that says it all, there just greedy, unsrupulous, human being devils, true stories fam

[LONDON!]

more evidence nato and the system are illegally trying to assassinate and murder a sovreign leader of another country for no other reason than to steal libya's oil

from www.dailymail.co.uk

Nato is trying to kill Gaddafi, admits top U.S. commander
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 10:57 AM on 27th June 2011

Comments (35)
Add to My Stories
Share
Nato forces are trying to kill Colonel Gaddafi, the top U.S. commander in the Libyan conflict has admitted.
Admiral Samuel Locklear told senior American politicians air strikes were designed to kill the Libyan leader, despite White House reassurances that this was not the aim.
Such a goal would not be authorised by the UN mandate for the attacks.


Admission: Admiral Samuel Locklear, right, has said that Nato are using air strikes to target Gaddafi - despite White House reassurances they were not
Admiral Locklear is the most senior figure to claim Gaddafi is a target.
Critics said the admission was further evidence of ‘mission creep’ and that Nato was breaking the rules of engagement.
Yesterday marked the 100th day since military action against the Libyan regime began. Eighteen nations including Britain, France and the U.S. have launched hundreds of air strikes in Libya to help rebels to overthrow Gaddafi.
Mike Turner, a member of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee, revealed that Admiral Locklear had told him removal of the dictator was on the table.
He said: ‘The UN authorisation had three components – blockade, no-fly zone and civil protection.
‘Admiral Locklear explained that the scope of civil protection was being interpreted to permit the removal of the chain of command of Gaddafi’s military, which includes Gaddafi.
‘He said that is the mission as Nato has defined. I believed we were targeting Gaddafi, but that confirmed it.
‘The scope that Nato is pursuing is beyond what is contemplated in civil protection, so they’re exceeding the mission.’
He added that Admiral Locklear, who heads the Allied Joint Force Command in Italy, had said publicly that a small force might have to go in on the ground to retain order if the rebels won.

Target: Nato sorties have already attacked the compound of Gaddafi , such as these which struck during a raid in March
The revelation comes amid reports that Gaddafi is already considering leaving Libya for fear of his own safety.
His compound in the capital, Tripoli, has repeatedly been bombed and his son Saif and three of his grandchildren have been killed in air strikes.
Last week it emerged that the cost of the conflict to Britain had reached £260million, despite initial predictions that the bill would be ‘tens of millions’.
Defence Secretary Liam Fox said yesterday Britain had the ‘moral and political resolve’ to finish the job.
In the latest fighting, rebels in western Libya said they had advanced and were battling Gaddafi’s forces in Bir al-Ghanam, 50 miles south of the capital.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1QVBbLWwa

[Compulsion]

thats what i'm saying, that article broke it down in a nutshell, there was a one million pro gadaffi rally in tripoli a couple of days ago, the western news media blacked this story out

the system has being putting out fake propaganda psy-ops stories on libya and gadaffi from the beginning, its all bullshit. about gadaffi giving out viagra to his troops so they can rape, its all bullshit

that statement about theirs gonna be a bloodbath in behghazi was said by a libyan goverment guy in scandinavia or sumthin, its fake shit, gadaffi didn't say that shit

this civil war would have ended long time ago, if gadaffi would have entered benghazi, they would have just targeted and legitimately, the rebels, they are former establishment members and terrorists, its legitmate for the goverment to defend the country from an attempted coup, the rebels would have left benghazi and the goverment troops would have left the remaining civillians alone, there would have been no bloodbath and i'm not a warmonger, the way i see it now, is that they should have dealt wit there beef diplomatically, but from when they got nato involved, they became traitors

everybody knows the system dosen't give two flying shits about brothers and sisters in libya, you see what i'm saying, thats why nato have murdered around 800 innocent civillians in libya already, in there evil eyes and devil logic, they see it as collateral damage, i mean that says it all, in there quest to steal libya's oil.

nato just want to bomb libya back to the stone ages like the system did in iraq, its collective punishment just so they can divide and rule and control the oil and this is who the rebels are siding wit, them terrorists are coming back from jihad wars in other places where theirs legitimate resistance against the system and its proxy's and then the other side of the coin of the legitimate local resistance element is the fruitcake terrorist shit, the otherside of the coin, but the point is, these terrorists who are apart of the rebel crew have seen the systems devilshment in places like iraq and so on and so on and they still want to side wit the system, that says it all, there just greedy, unsrupulous, human being devils, true stories fam

Where can I read about this? I tried searching, but only saw forum posts like this.

peace

[soul controller]

i wonder how many 'al queda terrorists' america and britan have flown into libya, i wonder how much ammunition and weaponery they have been given..

i wonder when the ground assault will start?

theirs a huge build up of troops inside the usa..

obama has drawn up that bill launching ww3..( more like ww6 or somthing- in all reality)

i think this will be the last proper summer for a while.. lol

the world govts need to enforce law.. theirs too many people waking up and protesting all over the world..

peace

[LONDON!]

Where can I read about this? I tried searching, but only saw forum posts like this.

peace

i can't find the article or youtube video's that showed this, but our look for it and come through wit it if i find it