.Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS
.
Last edited by Wu-Tang Forum Internet Poster; 01-10-2012 at 02:50 PM.
--youreallfags.
They should make losers like dan clean up all the ron paul signs after the election
2nd place in new hampshire!!!!
^^Did a paranoid, melanin-challenged, herpe-infested state-employee just call me a loser?
How cute.
--youreallfags.
your a liar and a faggot too
I speak in nothing but divine truths, and also am fairly certain that I bang a much higher class of bitch than you.
Now shouldn't you be testing circuits at your local branch of the DMV, Adam?
--youreallfags.
Ron Paul isn't winning, but he is kissing the ass of the guy that is.
However, I can respect Ron Paul's secondary motive of laying the political foundation for his son Randal Paul and his possible future endeavors.
But as for Ron Paul and his supporters;
he is much less intelligent, much less progressive, much less of a threat to the status quo, and much less honest than Ralph Nader was back in his day.
Not that I would or did vote for any of these people.
how did you come to those conclusions
Here is 2 different news organizations questioning Paul's relationship with Romney. I've seen similar questions raised, and evidence presented, by a couple of other news organizations. Not absolute proof, but anything is possible in the filthy game of politics.
The big corporations that have too much influence in U.S. politics kept Ralph Nader out of a Presidential debate in October of 2000. Even though Nader was on the ballot in almost all of the 50 states, he was excluded from the University of Massachusetts debate between Al Gore and George W. Bush. To take it even further, Nader was given a ticket by a UMass student, but Massachusetts State Police acting as goons, kept Nader from even entering the auditorium as a spectator.
Nader was much further removed from being a Washington D.C. "insider" than Paul is. I think his ideas were much more "outside of the box" and his organization was much more grassroots. Nader was more authentic as an alternative to the 2 party system.
Ralph Nader and Ron Paul mean little if nothing to me and my day to day, just an interesting comparison from observing politics.
You people need to understand something! Obama has more money than all the Republican candidates put together. He has more resources and support than all of them. No one wants to support a broke and weak candidate. I'm being honest here. It's all about the one the one who has the most CASH, Democrat or Republican! THINK ABOUT IT! If you guys are having trouble understanding this, then I don't know what to do for you.
That's unfortunately true for women with men as well.
the white devil ron paul is the only one who will put a stop to this bullshit...actually hes the only one even bringing up this issue
and yea hes not getting paid by the big corporate companies who have a special interest in buying the presidency
but he raised more money grass roots and donations by the troops then ALL OTHER CANIDATES COMBINED INCLUDING THAT TRAITOR OBAMA
Last edited by PALEHORSE; 03-24-2012 at 09:19 PM.
lol at sitting around waiting for some politician to make things right.
politics and our government are like casinos. its set up for the people who own it to make a fortune off you believing you're gonna make it if you keep trying.
Christianity = White Supremacy
If Ron Paul doesn't win, we riot.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks