01.01.2021
Page 22 of 23 FirstFirst ... 121314151617181920212223 LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 345

Thread: Dinosaurs did not become extinct they evolved?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Gehoxagogen ShaDynasty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Isla Nublar
    Posts
    19,010
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    ^ I think you posted in the thread before. You studied evolution or something? Thats dope.

  2. #2
    {>____<}
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,470
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShaDynasty View Post
    ^ I think you posted in the thread before. You studied evolution or something? Thats dope.
    You're right. I did. I just read a ton of books on it in high school/college.

    Trixx was a mess. Lol.
    Last edited by IrOnMaN; 01-14-2022 at 04:13 PM.
    Loyalty is Royalty. Strength and Loyalty

  3. #3

  4. #4
    {>____<}
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,470
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShaDynasty View Post
    What were you studying then?
    I received a BS in Geology. I work for the government now.
    Loyalty is Royalty. Strength and Loyalty

  5. #5
    'The Fourhorsemen' TSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    36
    Posts
    40,181
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    After studying the wutang double cd i began to wonder if T=Rex could have glided at one point. Those legs in proportion of body looking like they were spring loaded for jumping and the tail looks very balance oriented like a squirrel cause of proportion. What if trex our jump and gilde a little like a flying squirrel. Especially with the feathers?

    I have NO knowledge on this out of being interested in the 4th grade, the wutang double CD and procrastinating a very involved video project.

  6. #6
    Gehoxagogen ShaDynasty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Isla Nublar
    Posts
    19,010
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TSA View Post
    After studying the wutang double cd i began to wonder if T=Rex could have glided at one point. Those legs in proportion of body looking like they were spring loaded for jumping and the tail looks very balance oriented like a squirrel cause of proportion. What if trex our jump and gilde a little like a flying squirrel. Especially with the feathers?

    I have NO knowledge on this out of being interested in the 4th grade, the wutang double CD and procrastinating a very involved video project.
    T-Rex had tiny arms in proportion to its body, no way could it glide, it would need a huge wingspan. If a T-Rex could fly, then humans should be able to.

    Not going to pretend I understand any of this but:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aat4269

  7. #7

    Default

    Retired.

  8. #8
    ”Still craps and lies” Andy Warhov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    404
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Singing like Killah priest song 'Your arms too short to bop your hog!'

  9. #9
    {>____<}
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,470
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Jurassic Park franchise refuses to put feathers on the T-Rex and other coelurosaurs such as the velociraptor.
    Loyalty is Royalty. Strength and Loyalty

  10. #10

    Default

    Is it due to movie franchise recognizability?

    Feathers can't be more difficult to animate, although maybe animated movement might be more expensive (more 'shots' for moving feathers - I'm reminded of Ariel's hair underwater and how it was seen as both revolutionar and expensive when the animators made the hair flow underwater)

    feathers would have given the new toy line an edge too, in that the new line would be different from the older ones, making it interesting for both kids and collectors

    some pros and cons, just thinking out loud here
    Retired.

  11. #11
    {>____<}
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,470
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hal Incandenza View Post
    Is it due to movie franchise recognizability?

    Feathers can't be more difficult to animate, although maybe animated movement might be more expensive (more 'shots' for moving feathers - I'm reminded of Ariel's hair underwater and how it was seen as both revolutionar and expensive when the animators made the hair flow underwater)

    feathers would have given the new toy line an edge too, in that the new line would be different from the older ones, making it interesting for both kids and collectors

    some pros and cons, just thinking out loud here
    I understand. I wish Hollywood would be honest, especially when it comes to the dinosaurs. For example, a Velociraptor is not 6ft tall. It was only 3ft tall, the size of a large turkey. Utah Raptors are what we see on the big screen.
    Loyalty is Royalty. Strength and Loyalty

  12. #12
    Gehoxagogen ShaDynasty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Isla Nublar
    Posts
    19,010
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IrOnMaN View Post
    I understand. I wish Hollywood would be honest, especially when it comes to the dinosaurs. For example, a Velociraptor is not 6ft tall. It was only 3ft tall, the size of a large turkey. Utah Raptors are what we see on the big screen.
    I always thought it was Deinonychus.

    But really it doesn't matter - Jurassic Park is not a documentary its art/entertainment. The details matter less than the ideas/story being presented.

  13. #13
    {>____<}
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,470
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShaDynasty View Post
    I always thought it was Deinonychus.

    But really it doesn't matter - Jurassic Park is not a documentary its art/entertainment. The details matter less than the ideas/story being presented.
    Hmm. I never thought about that. That sounds right. I never looked into. I should know this. Lol
    Loyalty is Royalty. Strength and Loyalty

  14. #14
    Gehoxagogen ShaDynasty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Isla Nublar
    Posts
    19,010
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    The Raptors in JP3 had feathers. Something like a T Rex might not have had many feathers anyway.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShaDynasty View Post
    The Raptors in JP3 had feathers. Something like a T Rex might not have had many feathers anyway.

    I was thinking that when I read those posts. Why would a T - Rex or Velociraptor have feathers?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •