01.01.2021
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Death with dignity for the terminally ill

  1. #1
    Non Ignorants check two's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    42,233
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Death with dignity for the terminally ill

    Why are some people so against this?

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Yesterday, a 29-year-old woman announced that she — not the rare tumor in her brain — is going to end her life on Nov. 1.

    Her goal is to raise awareness about a growing "dying with dignity" movement that gives terminally ill people the right to choose when they take their final breath.

    In an online video campaign with advocacy organization Compassion & Choices, Brittany Maynard tells her story: Debilitating headaches, which started right after her wedding, eventually led to her being diagnosed with stage IV glioblastoma multiforme, a fast-growing brain cancer that usually kills its victims in a matter of months.

    "My glioblastoma is going to kill me, and that's out of my control," she told People magazine in an exclusive interview. "I've discussed with many experts how I would die from it, and it's a terrible, terrible way to die. Being able to choose to go with dignity is less terrifying."

    After exploring and weighing the options available to her, Maynard and her husband decided to move from San Francisco to Portland, Ore., where she would have access to Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (DWDA). Passed in 1997, the law "allows terminally ill Oregonians to end their lives through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medications, expressly prescribed by a physician for that purpose."

    According the most recent data 1,173 people have had DWDA prescriptions written, and 752 patients have died from ingesting medications prescribed under the DWDA. To qualify under DWDA, a person has to be a mentally competent adult and a resident of the state of Oregon.

    "The goal is to give people who are terminally ill a dignified way to exit," George Eighmey, a retired Oregon legislator who helped pass the law, told Yahoo Health. "That begins with making sure they are getting the best possible care, and that they have the opportunity to explore every option available to them."

    Maynard's story shines a spotlight on the so-called "aid in dying" movement that has been slowly gaining acceptance in the United States. Since 2008, four other states have passed "death with dignity" legislation: —Washington, Vermont, Montana, and New Mexico.

    For years, helping terminally ill patients end their lives was considered immoral, and doctors who answered the call were shunned and stigmatized. Terms such as "euthanasia" and "assisted suicide" caused fear and misunderstanding, said Eighmey, who is now a board member for the Death With Dignity National Center.

    "The more educated people become, the less fear they have about it and the less stigma it carries," he said. "No one is pressured into using this law; in fact, very few people do. What's important is that the choice is available to anyone who qualifies."

    Despite the momentum that DWDA laws have gained in recent years, there is still pushback, Eighmey said. "People try to make this a religious or political issue," he continued. "But the diversity of those who use this law does not support that argument." According to data Eighmey gathered over the years, more than 50 percent of people who participated in the program described themselves as belonging to a religion, and another 25 percent claimed to be spiritual. Politically, 41 percent said that they were Republican and 43 percent claimed to be Democrat. "It crosses religious and political barriers," he said. "This is an option that gives comfort to people no matter what they believe."

    Advocates of DWDA, staunchly oppose the notion that people who choose this option are committing suicide. "The public generally tends to think os of suicide as something committed by a person who is severely depressed but physically healthy, yet they don't want to live," said Eighmey. "Aid in dying involves mentally competent people who are terminally ill but would love to live, if possible. People choose to do this not out of desperation, but to maintain some aspect of control in their lives."

    Maynard specifically addressed the notion of "suicide" in her interview with People magazine. "There is not a cell in my body that is suicidal or that wants to die," she said., "I want to live. I wish there was a cure for my disease but there's not."









  2. #2
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    There is nothing in death that is dignifying.

    Doctors need to be helping people get better (hypocratic oath), not killng them. It is a slippery slope that may lead to people getting killed who didn't want to get killed.

  3. #3
    Non Ignorants check two's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    42,233
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    They have to be mentally fully functioning and terminally ill when they give their consent though.









  4. #4
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by check two View Post
    They have to be mentally fully functioning and terminally ill when they give their consent though.
    I still don't like the idea of killer doctors. Sounds like a horror movie.








  5. #5
    Be Seeing You hashashin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    3,240
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    I totally agree with euthanasia for terminally ill patients if that is their wish, I would even go one step further and say it should be made available for long term/treatment resistant mental illness though obviously there would have to be much stricter criteria for this category

  6. #6

    Default

    Last year the Belgian parliament voted a law that allows even minors euthanasia (when suffering intolerable pain due to terminal illness). The subject polarized society greatly. I believe this is the only country in the world taking euthanasia this far, so to speak.

    Personally I'm of the opinion euthanasia can be allowed under some circumstances. Same goes for abortion by the way. That doesn't mean I don't respect other people's different views on these subjects.
    Retired.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Age
    19
    Posts
    16,773
    Rep Power
    96

    Default

    Not only should this be a legal practice I will take it a step further and say that me as a seemingly healthy mid 20's male living in a developed world I should be able to go to a hospital, sign all of my vital organs to the needy and stick me with some nembutal.

    It's crazy that at the very least people living in pain every day are not given their peace. They want you alive to milk every last cent out of your existance. It's not about human rights or some bullshit oath, it's about money. They don't want you cured but they don't want you dead either. That;s why we're living to years well beyond our functionality

    Quote Originally Posted by diggy View Post
    There is nothing in death that is dignifying
    Subjective. That's your opinion only.
    Posts by The Hound are signed TH.

    Quoting ≠ Agreement.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diggy View Post
    It is a slippery slope that may lead to people getting killed who didn't want to get killed.

    I agree.


    They should just "Dead the Issue" (Pun Intended) lol.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •