Originally Posted by
jack strawb
Congratulations, I guess, on failing to report on the myriad ways the Clinton campaign stole this election, and the primary process along with it.
--The DNC, presided over by Clinton courtier Debbie Wasserman-Schulz, front-loaded the Southern primaries in 2016 (compare with the 2008 schedule, and be aware the first four primaries are essentially unmovable).
--The DNC made the early primaries, which Hillary Clinton was likely to win against any challenger, primaries rather than caucuses, thereby encouraging the perception she had greater popular vote support.
--The DNC rigged the debate schedule making it unlikely another candidate would be able to overcome Clinton's name recognition and her support among professional Democrats.
--The DNC created / maintained a superdelegate process that effectively granted Clinton a 700 delegate lead and also the appearance of inevitability.
--The DNC cooperated through studied passivity in suppressing the vote, as in Arizona.
--The DNC cooperated with the state Democratic party in New York in suppressing the number of new voters who could vote in the NY primary, and the number of Independents who could change their affiliation in time to vote for a candidate other than Clinton.
All these and more benefited Hillary Clinton, and even so she will barely win the nomination.
Oh, that's right, you're journalists. Doubtless you'll get on this some time after November 2016.
Bookmarks