Do this more^Originally Posted by TSA
..
breadcrumbs
gnalej!
Lol!
killafifth.wordpress.com
Overlooked my ass. It was investigated and just like virtually every single legal expert said when the investigation started, they couldn't begin to prove criminal intent. That was an incredibly stupid and lazy mistake that reflects poorly on Clinton's judgement in a major way. Impossible to convict here though. Nobody would have indicted her. Criminal intent can not possibly be proven or even come close for that matter.
Obama voted against the war in Iraq and followed the set timetable that the Bush administration had already agreed with Iraq on as far as our troop withdrawal. How in the hell was ISIS created by Obama? WTF? You do realize ISIS has existed since before Obama was elected right? They just changed their name. Remember Al Qaeda in Iraq? Educate yourself.
lmao they trained, armed and supplied the very people that became part of what's known as Isis, what the fuck are you talking about? The whole reason they were in Libya when the terrorists fucked them up was to sell them weapons.
Sure, previous American regimes created Al-Qaeda and the foundation was there but this shit was nowhere out of control until the Syrian war and Obama chose wrong. Isis was nothing at that point.
Maybe it's more appropriate to say Hillary created Isis since you clearly believe that Muslims attacked the senator in Libya over a YouTube video lmao
Posts by The Hound are signed TH.
Quoting ≠ Agreement.
I'm not sure what you mean. Sounds like a strawman. There is no requirement to prove criminal intent whatsoever.
FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Off the Hook Print Article
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-hillary-hook
"There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services. Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.
In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence. I would point out, moreover, that there are other statutes that criminalize unlawfully removing and transmitting highly classified information with intent to harm the United States. Being not guilty (and, indeed, not even accused) of Offense B does not absolve a person of guilt on Offense A, which she has committed."
Here's an example of a sailor merely taking pictures inside the submarine where they worked with his cellphone. There's no evidence of any intent to share the pictures with anyone. http://www.businessinsider.com/r-us-...bmarine-2015-7 He was arrested by the FBI for a Federal Offense and is out on a $100,000 bond. He is facing 10 years imprisonment and loses his military pension. His career is ruined. Why? Because he's not Hillary Clinton with cronies planted in the DOJ and FBI. The purpose of an independent SPECIAL PROSECUTOR is to get someone OUTSIDE of government who isn't OWNED by the politicians who appointed them to the government positions. Bill Clinton meeting with the Attorney General of the DOJ while his wife was being investigated by the DOJ and FBI hardly gives the appearance of impartiality. Face it. She committed multiple crimes including obstruction of justice, lying to a Federal investigator, destruction of evidence, etc. But she very well might win the presidency tonight so I guess she's above the law and no one cares. Sucks being the small guy working in the submarine. It's nice being a democrat elitist financed and funded by globalist bankers and Saudi oil tycoons.
Obama never voted against the Iraq War. He wasn't even a Senator in 2001. Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraqi War. More military personnel died in Afghanistan under Obama than under W Bush. There's still American troops in Iraq. 15 have died this year. Obama sent a surge of 10,000 green berets into Iraq in 2014 long after he claimed he had pulled out. http://www.duffelblog.com/2014/06/green-berets-iraq/
ISIS as they are currently organized did not exist prior to Barack Obama. Although many of the terrorists fighting for ISIS have been conducting terror for a very long time, ISIS didn't come into existence as it is today until Abu Bakr took power in 2010. You can argue about a slow transition of Al Qaeda forces beginning to regroup as early as 2006. Some claim that ISIS is the same terrorist group led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi for damn near 20 years. But he never operated as ISIS and his death from US airstrikes in 2006 left a void in leadership in the organization and an opportunity for a new terrorist campaign. There's many ways of looking at this. ISIS is mostly made up of former Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq.
What you and the Obama sycophantic cocksuckers don't want to admit is that Obama and Hillary (and John Kerry to some extent) were actively arming and financing terrorist rebels to overthrow regimes such as Qaddafi and to attack Assad and this was at the wishes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Many ISIS leaders joked that they were being funded by the U.S. They were driving around in U.S. Humvees utilizing many of the military resources Obama abandoned in Iraq. In the future years more information about this may leak out, although a Hillary presidency may just result in more missing hard drives from the state department's archives and more deleted emails.
In all fairness, you can certainly put much of the blame on George W Bush for not having a concrete exit plan in place by the time his 8 year presidency ended. But Obama had already made promises and taken uninformed stances on the Iraqi War before he was sworn in and briefed by military generals, many of who he later fired and suffered the consequences for by having nothing buy yesmen serving an inexperienced manchild as Commander in Chief whose only experience was organizing race riots and neighborhood welfare sign-ups.
What we have now is what you should have very much expected from a president who has an Arabic first name and an Arabic middle name - the slaughter of Christians in the middle east and servitude to Saudi oil tycoons, the same ones who made large donations to Hillary Clinton's fake Foundation. So don't expect a foreign policy of sucking arabian oil kingpin dicks to end soon if Hillary is elected tonight.
Last edited by Sense-A; 11-08-2016 at 06:03 PM.
Great posts ^^
I hope people have been stocking up on bullion gold
Posts by The Hound are signed TH.
Quoting ≠ Agreement.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks