Are you a FAN of Big Tech Censorship?

[The Seer]

...

[Dooch]

Yes. In communist America, we must weed out negative views toward our government and ensure The People, the correct message is heard.

[b-dolo]

I am a fan of free market economics.

https://www.realclearmarkets.com/art...ip_496692.html

[Sense-A]

They should ban porn.

[Hal Incandenza]

I'd rather make a porn database than an election 'fraud' database

[TSA]

people literally go to work everyday and leave their office building thinking that free speech is a by-product of corporations. Or walk in and out of any establishment designed to make money and think 'you know what doesn't exclusively strive to regulate human behavior as an existential function? A business'. Or that someone's private property is the best place to get constitutional and democratically balanced treatment from the owner of said property that has 100% leverage since youre literally on his personal shit being dumb.

I dont believe a private company telling you hoq it feels you should use its property is censorship. You can always ChOoSe another platform. If i got on douch's lawn and started a diatribe about how he fertilizes it too much and he tells me to get off his yard, thats not censorship.

[The Seer]

If you are in this thread. VOTE.

[ShaDynasty]

I was going to say something similar to TSA. Nobody is forcing you to use twitter or facebook. They can do whatever they like, up to and including flagging horseshit conspiracy theories.

Also I read that Trump may start his own news outlet and social media app. So that's something to look forward to.

[TSA]

LOL that would be interesting

[Dooch]

Look we can be facetious about all of this but they blatantly started Censoring stuff during the height of the election.

It’s also corny how they tried to pretend wasn’t about them trying to influence people.

But your right you don’t have to use it. I don’t even have a twitter and I definitely won’t be influence by any generic “election notification” Facebook puts out.


And “Trump twitter” would be a no brainer. I’d be more shocked if he didn’t try to do something like that.

[The Seer]

They can do whatever they like, up to and including flagging horseshit conspiracy theories.

WRONG. They are trying to have it both ways. Read: https://www.city-journal.org/html/pl...her-15888.html

[Sense-A]

If this is about Twitter, Facebook, etc. I think Conservatives should just not use the websites because there are good, available alternatives.

But if the electric utility company or the water company or the phone company suddenly refuse to sell me electricity or water or phone service because of my creed, then we have a fucking problem.

[Sense-A]

I'd rather make a porn database than an election 'fraud' database

[Hal Incandenza]

thanks I take all my advice from rotund middle aged men wearing polka dots

[TSA]

Social media trying to pretend it isn't bias is annoying, but, sadly, it was actually the republicans that cracked open this can of worms lol. I can't remember the name of the bill but Bush 1 took down and age old law where media houses had to report on both sides of a story and talk about politics for a regulated amount of time. Which is how you got the 60s style of news reporting where they gave you the info and moved the fuck on.

They took it down because they were - no exaggeration - trying to get Fox News to become Fox News in conjunction with Murdoch. The end result is the only media outlet that's remotely ok with republicans is fox and the rest is brazenly democrat. Extremely stupid calculation on their end. Doesn't make it more right that the people who created this hellhole are the ones burning the most, but the all of these companies are acting well within their rights and logical disposition. Non-media companies also don't want anything to do with the right because of all the 'ism' floating around there and how it's bad for business.