okay lets break this down.. i didnt 4get about it...
u say that the concept of god that u believe in is that god is perfect and thus by definition is complete and without needs or wants.. (these are u words that u agreed to)
The problem with your way of thinking and ultimately your concept of god is the logical contradiction...as such:
this is a widely known philosophical stance and i xplain it further in my new book "Why Bad Beliefs Dont Die" (due out Aug 11 th!!, preorders start July 4th)
The Perfection vs Creation Fallacy
step 1) God is allegedly perfect
step 2) God allegedly created the universe
step 3) Perfection implies a state of being complete , without needs or wants
step 4) if god created the universe, he obviously either wanted to or needed to create it !
step 5) remember, a perfect being cant had needs or wants (at any time)
step 6) this means god isnt perfect
step 7) if god isnt perfect, this violates the premise of step 1.
step 8) logically , god cant exist.
see the problem with your concept sweet sista?
in addition, u also stated that god is unchanging ie immutable
here is the problem
Religious Fallacy of Immutability
Step 1) God is immutable/unchnaging
Step 2) God created the universe
Step 3) in order to create the universe, this means god had an "intent" to create the universe before he created it !
Step 4) after god creates the universe, his intent was satisfied and thus he no longer had the intent
Step 5) by no longer having the intent, god's idealogical stance has fundamentally changed from his originally stance (of having an intent!)
Step 6) God is supposed to be immutable?
Step 7) logically god isnt immutable
Step 8) God doesnt exist
Bookmarks