Does Geometry prove a God's Existence?

[Shemsu Elohim]

sometimes these forums turn into a pissing contest

SOMETIMES???

[LHX]

SOMETIMES???

true

[Prince Rai]

lol... hmm

[KBA7]

Things start gettin confused about God's role in our lives by people who arent 1 w/ all.

[aismani]

Tru geometrics god MANIFESTS creations existence,gods not about to prove ANYTHING to a kafir,gettin to the light, the core or the essence however u want to call it is mans obligation,what we call the holy war

A NAIL WANT PROOF FROM THE ARCHITECT? hhmmmmmmm...

[My First Timbs]

explain

[dollabill]

Yeah explain

[Aqueous Moon]

Ha!

I just read this whole thread.

Good add-ons from everyone.

But, geez...LHX, blew this whole thing up.

Hurry up and write a book, Light!

[LHX]

oh yeah

this is the thread where timbs didnt answer my question



this thread is epic

---6 months ago


why have i not been killed yet?

[LHX]

i think the ultimate point is that 'god' proves the existence of 'geometry'

[TUCO]

www.freepost.com

[galt john galt]

imo the idea and concept of "god" that is hinted toward when one understands quantum physics is greater and mor epowerful and more far reaching than any concept of a supernatural father figure.. it makes all of that look like backwater nonsense.. if a "god" exists, the concept is so unimaginable and greater than what religion has ever conceived!

so are you imlying that god can exist but only in a vacum of quantum mechanics and that to have any other way is far fetched?

you are there by saying that god is a mathmetician. yet science can't add up to the knowledge completeness of god. that's comparable to those equations about the graph never reaching infinity nor zero - zeno's paradox.

[My First Timbs]

so are you imlying that god can exist but only in a vacum of quantum mechanics and that to have any other way is far fetched?

not att all.

i am purely saying that the concept of a "god" that is elduded to when one understands quantum mechanics and quantum physics is so more far reaching and "important" than the traditional concept of a father figure who is watching over us, that it makes the latter seem so elementary.

you are there by saying that god is a mathmetician. yet science can't add up to the knowledge completeness of god. that's comparable to those equations about the graph never reaching infinity nor zero - zeno's paradox

i never staed that god is a "mathemetician".. what ive been urging is an understanding that mathematics is a humanoid contruct to which we define and give meaning to. Its a human construct. but within this contruct lies inherant dlimemna and intrigue for questioning. In that questioning, people asign god to the unknown.

[dif de la rev]

from what read of your statement, you view is that the concept of god can be proven by the coincedence coincidence factor of synchronisty with time as the variable and space the subject and object of the motion under the states of past present future through perpetual kinetic potential of quarks n nanos, that would entail the subconscious to the psyche and the genetic code of the individual?

the string theory of limited possibilities with unlimited causes?

[My First Timbs]

from what read of your statement, you view is that the concept of god can be proven by the coincedence coincidence factor of synchronisty with time as the variable and space the subject and object of the motion under the states of past present future through perpetual kinetic potential of quarks n nanos, that would entail the subconscious to the psyche and the genetic code of the individual?

the string theory of limited possibilities with unlimited causes?

no, i was merely referring to the concept of reality being viewed thru the lens of an objective observer...the objective observer being whatever ppl want to call it.. some call it "god", some call it simply a quantum concept of an objective observer.