who me?Originally Posted by Palehorse
who me?Originally Posted by Palehorse
all the points have been made
for me personallyOriginally Posted by Palehorse
i studied the i ching first
and then noticed that the 5 percent literature was coming to the same conclusions as i was seeing in the i ching
there is no question about it tho
the terms that 5 percent literature chooses to use is harsh
the words white and black get everybodys juices flowing
they are controversial words
but
if you consider the environment that the literature was introduced to america with
it starts to make sense why they would use such harsh words
if the people in the slums could not visibly identify an enemy
it would have been impossible to get anybody to listen to such esoteric knowledge
maybe the literature needs to be updated for the times
what worked then may not be what would work now
what good is yesterdays map when the landscape has shifted?
all the points have been made
nice break downOriginally Posted by Palehorse
consider this
it is not clear whether yacub was an actual man or whether he is a group of people or whether he is an understanding
also
yacub did not create the white man for anybodys 'benefit'
instead
yacub did it because it had to be done
or
because it was possible
from my research and understanding
it seems to me that yacub and the white man has a lot to do with the development of words and the phonetic alphabet and lies
it is a lot easier to conceptualize yacub as an actual man when a person is introduced to a system of knowledge
but
it is useful to try and look past the metaphors
also
i have challenging people a lot lately to question the validity of all facts and data
thats the only question i ask you -
what kind of facts or data are you looking for?
something you can verify with your eyes?
all the points have been made
is not truth what convicts people to do actions that they carry out - their disposition to receiving/acknowleedging it? and by that very approach to truth itself the responsibility resides in the understanding they receive?
everyone is responsible to representing the truth as it stands not how it should go.
Originally Posted by LHX
would you agree that the devil is a tool
and
not something to be reformed?"
Originally Posted by Wooly Noggins
he is there to reform not be reformed - he's that fire that you put steel in to shape it - when all the swords are sharp and ready to slice, you put the fire out
Bookmarks