shiiiit i was playing crackdown like 4 hours straight..when i got done i was out walking around with my boy and i thought i could jump real high like in the game so jump into a wall that was 8 feet and busted my shins on the ledge
i couldnt reach my achevment
3 cities to romp around in ? the shit isnt final fantasy, if you have like 3 cities you wont get shit done, LC got 3 islands anyway what more you want, theyre gonna fuck this game up if they just pump it full of shit thats unnecessary
Posts by The Hound are signed TH.
Quoting ≠ Agreement.
GTA San Andreas had 3 cities dude. That shit was dope.Originally Posted by Tonearm_Terrorwrist
gone.
Not an accurate representation of white people.
I think he meant 3 completely different cities in the game, not like 3 islands.
Yeah, that's what i meant too. San Andreas had 3 completely different cities. You had to travel through countryside and little villages to get to another city.
gone.
Not an accurate representation of white people.
^^^ I think, that you think the GTAIV maps are gonna are gonna be the same as GTAIII. You're forgetting that this game will be on next-gen consoles. The islands are gonna be huge as shit
I dont think this game is going to represent GTA3 at all, i think it'll have a few spots from GTA3 for nostalga but besides that it will probably be more NY.
BIG L Rest In Peace
since san andreas has 3 major west coast cities like LA, San Fran & Vegas, GTA IV should have 3 east coast cities like NY (with the bridges and other landmarks), Boston (with the trollies) & Chicago or Atlantic City (with the Casinos)
i wonder if the Twin Towers will be included in the game
Last edited by mAlAkAz; 04-08-2007 at 02:01 AM.
Good question.
We know Rockstar love contreversy, but will they dare have the twin towers in the game? Or something that resembles them. If they do, this game will be slaughtered by the government and some media, but even without the twin towers in it'll probably get into trouble.
BIG L Rest In Peace
I don't see why the towers couldn't be included if the setting was in the mid 90s or whatever. Its still only a fictional setting after all.
Chicks dig giant robots
well GTA3 was released after 9/11 so i doubt it ... they changed the police cars and uniform over it so id doubt theyd chuck in the towers ... theres controversy and then there's controversy they dont wanna fuck with ...
Posts by The Hound are signed TH.
Quoting ≠ Agreement.
It would be good publicity, because they will be in the news with that shit tho. Like with the whole hot coffee shit in SA.
And with that i would like to say; fuck all the whore's who were bitching about the hot coffee patch. "ohhh no, there pixelated sex in the game, that's sooo wrong". Stfu. I hope the people who were bitching about die of AIDS. Fucking pussies.
gone.
Not an accurate representation of white people.
thats a pretty fuckin tasteless and idiotic statement right there
do you really think stirring the 9/11 pot is on some 'good publicity' shit ?
Posts by The Hound are signed TH.
Quoting ≠ Agreement.
Nah, its like bad publicity..but that could turn out in good publicity with shit like that. Perhaps not in America, but def. in Europe.
That's what i meant. Bad publicity is also publicity.
gone.
Not an accurate representation of white people.
wtf? Why not put the towers in the game? As already written, if the story will be held before 2001, it's quite automatic they will put the towers in there to ensure high level of reality.
I'm low-key like seashells. |::GZA/Genius::|
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks