01.01.2021
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Ancient African Kings Of India

  1. #1

    Default Ancient African Kings Of India

    http://mindwarz.com/media/node/2825

    Ancient African Kings Of India
    Submitted by Mindwarz on Wed, 2007-03-21 01:13. african ancient civilization india
    By Dr. Clyde Winters

    Ethiopians have had very intimate relations with Indians. In fact, in antiquity the Ethiopians ruled much of India. These Ethiopians were called the Naga. It was the Naga who created Sanskrit.

    A reading of ancient Dravidian literature which dates back to 500 BC, gives us considerable information on the Naga. In Indian tradition the Naga won central India from the Villavar (bowmen) and Minavar (fishermen).

    The Naga were great seamen who ruled much of India, Sri Lanka and Burma. To the Aryans they described as half man and snake. The Tamil knew them as warlike people who used the and noose.

    The earliest mention of the Naga, appear in the Ramayana , they are also mentioned in the Mahabharata. In the Mahabharata we discover that the
    Naga had the capital city in the Dekkan, and other cities spread between the Jumna and Ganges as early as 1300 BC. The Dravidian classic, the Chilappathikaran made it clear that the first great kingdom of India was
    Naganadu.

    The Naga probably came from Kush-Punt/Ethiopia. The Puntites were the greatest sailors of the ancient world. In the Egyptian inscriptions there is mention of the Puntite ports of Outculit, Hamesu and Tekaru, which corresponds to Adulis, Hamasen and Tigre.

    In Sumerian text, it is claimed that the Puntites traded with the people of the Indus Valley or Dilmun. According to S.N. Kramer in The Sumerians, part of Punt was probably called Meluhha, and Dilmun was probably the ancient name of the Indus Valley. (Today some scholars maintain that Oman, where we find no ancient cities was Dilmun and the Indus Valley may have been Meluhha).

    Ancient Ethiopian traditions support the rule of Puntites or Ethiopians of India. In the Kebra Nagast, we find mention of the Arwe kings who ruled India. The founder of the dynasty was Za Besi Angabo. This dynasty according to the Kebra Nagast began around 1370 BC. These rulers of India and Ethiopia were called Nagas. The Kebra Nagast claims that ” Queen Makeda “had servants and merchants; they traded for her at sea and on land in the Indies and Aswan”. It also says that her son Ebna Hakim or Menelik I, made a campaign in the Indian Sea; the king of India made gifts and donations and prostrated himself before him”. It is also said that Menalik ruled an empire that extended from the rivers of Egypt (Blue Nile) to the west and from the south Shoa to eastern India”, according to the Kebra
    Nagast. The Kebra Nagast identification of an eastern Indian empre ruled by
    the Naga, corresponds to the Naga colonies in the Dekkan, and on the East
    coast between the Kaviri and Vaigai rivers.

    The presence of Meluhhaites/ Puntites in India may expain the Greek tradition of Kusites ruling India up to the Ganges. It would also explain the Aryan traditions of Mlechchas ( Sanskrit name for some of the non-Aryan people) as one of the aboriginal groups of India. Many scholars associate the name Mlechchas with Meluhha.

    The major Naga tribes were the Maravar, Eyinar, Oliyar, Oviyar, Aru-Valur and Parathavar. The Nagas resisted the invansion of the Cholas. In the Kalittokai IV,1-5, the Naga are described as being “of strong limbs and hardy frames and fierce looking tigers wearing long and curled locks of hair.” The Naga kings of Sri Lanka are mentioned in the: Mahawanso, and are said to have later become Dravidians, as testified to by the names of these people: Naganathan, Nagaratnam, Nagaraja, nagra. and etc.

    The major gift of the Naga to India was the writing system: Nagari. Nagari is the name for the Sanskrit script. Over a hundred years ago Sir William Jones, pointed out that the ancient Ethiopic and Sanskrit writing are one and the same.

    William Jones, explained that the Ethiopian origin of Sanskrit was supported by the fact that both writing systems the writing went from left to right and the vowels
    were annexed to the consonants. Today Eurocentric scholars teach that Indians taught writing to the Ethiopians, yet the name Nagari for Sanskrit betrays the Ethiopia origin of this form of writing. Moreover, it is interesting to note that Sanskrit vowels: a,aa,’,I,u,e,o, virama etc., are in the same order as Geez.

    The Ethiopian script has influenced many other writing systems. Y.M. Kobishnor, in the Unesco History of Africa, maintains that Ethiopic was used as the model for Armenian writing, as was many of the Transcaucasian scripts. Dravidian literature indicate that the Naga may have introduced worship of Kali, the Serpent, Murugan and the Sun or Krishna. It is interesting to note that a god called Murugan is worshipped by many people in East Africa.

    It is interesting that Krishna, who was associated with the Sun, means Black, this is analogous to the meaning of Khons of the Kushites. Homer, described Hercules as follows: “Black he stood as night his uncased, his arrow string for flight”. This mention of arrows identifies the Kushites as warriors who
    used the , a common weapon of the Kushites and the Naga.

    Kumarinadu

    The Naga or Ethiopians were defeated by Dravidian speaking people from Kumarinadu. Kamarinadu is suppose to have formerly existed as a large Island in the India ocean which connected India with East Africa. This landmass is mentioned in the Silappadikaram, which said that Kamarinadu was made up of seven nadus or regions. The Dravidian scholars Adiyarkunallar and Nachinaar wrote about the ancient principalities of Tamilaham, which existed on Kamarinadu.

    Kumarinadu was ruled by the Pandyans/Pandians at Madurai before it
    sunk beneath the sea. The greatest king of Kumarinadu was Sengoon.
    According to Dravidian scholars the Pandyans worshipped the goddess Kumari Amman. This Amman, probably corresponds to the ancient god Amon of the Kushites.

    The Kalittokai 104, makes it clear that after the Pandyans were forced to migrate off their Island home into South India, “to compensate for the area lost to the great s of the sea, King Pandia without tiresome moved to the other countries and won them. Removing the emblems of tiger (Cholas) and (Cheras) he, in their place inscribed his reputed emblem fish (Pandia’s) and valiantly made his enemies to him”.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Good find. There is a lot of black history that is coming out thanks to the internet. It is a shame that the historians like to write about white people's achievements and leave out non-white history except the shameful parts like slavery.

  3. #3
    'The Fourhorsemen' TSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    36
    Posts
    40,179
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    nigga please.

  4. #4
    Commando Ultra WU-KILLAH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,373
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diggy View Post
    Good find. There is a lot of black history that is coming out thanks to the internet. It is a shame that the historians like to write about white people's achievements and leave out non-white history except the shameful parts like slavery.
    fortunately the greatest historians are on the internet to tell us the untold truth.

    Now we know blacks ruled Egypt, Europe, America, India, the Moon, Mars etc etc etc
    F.L.I.N.T.

  5. #5

    Default

    africans were also in the americas, look at the olmec civilisation.

  6. #6
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WU-KILLAH View Post
    fortunately the greatest historians are on the internet to tell us the untold truth.

    Now we know blacks ruled Egypt, Europe, America, India, the Moon, Mars etc etc etc

    The truth eventually is revealed!

  7. #7
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Synergy777 View Post
    africans were also in the americas, look at the olmec civilisation.

    That's right!. The darker populations of this earth have travelled it much before the caucasian race. The ancient invention of the boat made this possible. It was only a matter of time before someone thought "lets travel the earth with it".

    But the white historians with their superiority problem would like for the world to think only white people have accomplished great things, so they suppressed the truth...only for a limited time though. The truth is here.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Did u know that ancient Iraqis were black? Iraq used to be called Sumer.

    http://saxakali.com/Saxakali-Publications/runoko31.htm


    http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/sumerians.html

  9. #9
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default


    Legacy
    Most authorities credit the Sumerians with the invention of the wheel, initially in the form of the potter's wheel.

    The Sumerians were among the first astronomers, mapping the stars into sets of constellations, many of which constellations survived in the zodiac and in the constellations known to the ancient Greeks[10]. The five planets that are visible to the naked eye also have Sumerian names[11].

    Finally, the Sumerians ushered in the age of intensive agriculture and irrigation. Emmer wheat, barley, sheep (starting as moufflon) and cattle (starting as aurochs) were foremost among the species cultivated and raised for the first time on a grand scale. These inventions and innovations easily place the Sumerians among the most creative cultures in human pre-history and history

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumer

  10. #10
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    O-Block
    Posts
    11,674
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Looking at history, whichever region is considered, Africa, Europe, Australia, or America, the major migrations have always been from Asia. In every area of the world where Japhethites (Caucasians) have subsequently settled, they have always been preceded by Hamites ( Blacks). This pattern applies in every continent. In early historic times the circumstance seems always to be true, the earliest fossil remains of man being Mongoloid or Negroid in character and in head shape, whereas those that came last belong to the family of Japheth (Caucasoid). If you study ancient history and technological achievements, which were in many ways the equal of, or superior of, much that we have today, were founded and carried to a high technological proficiency by Hamitic (Black) people, showing an amazing adaptability to the world in which they live. Their achievements were exploited by Japhetic (Caucasian) and Semitic peoples, who became great scientific discoverers. The Hamitic migrations indicate they sought a way of life, not an understanding or a control of nature beyond what was immediately useful.

    http://www.soundchristian.com/man/
    Last edited by diggy; 07-07-2007 at 11:06 PM.

  11. #11
    'The Fourhorsemen' TSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    36
    Posts
    40,179
    Rep Power
    167

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by diggy View Post
    Did u know that ancient Iraqis were black? Iraq used to be called Sumer.


    nigga please.

  12. #12
    'The Fourhorsemen' TSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    36
    Posts
    40,179
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    why does any of this shit have to matter. Your allin the white trap of thinking ghthat a poeple aren't great unless they build a rome-like civilization. fuck that.

    Africans didn't run Europe(except spain)

    Africans didn't run India

    Africans didn't run Asia

    Africans didn't run America.


    There's no african culture that believes dominating a foriegn ppl, land, or culture is a symbol of greatness.

    it's like raping a chick. that doesn't mean your mack. just means your a dick. that's how they see it.

  13. #13
    'The Fourhorsemen' TSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    36
    Posts
    40,179
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diggy View Post
    Looking at history, whichever region is considered, Africa, Europe, Australia, or America, the major migrations have always been from Asia. In every area of the world where Japhethites (Caucasians) have subsequently settled, they have always been preceded by Hamites ( Blacks). This pattern applies in every continent. In early historic times the circumstance seems always to be true, the earliest fossil remains of man being Mongoloid or Negroid in character and in head shape, whereas those that came last belong to the family of Japheth (Caucasoid). If you study ancient history and technological achievements, which were in many ways the equal of, or superior of, much that we have today, were founded and carried to a high technological proficiency by Hamitic (Black) people, showing an amazing adaptability to the world in which they live. Their achievements were exploited by Japhetic (Caucasian) and Semitic peoples, who became great scientific discoverers. The Hamitic migrations indicate they sought a way of life, not an understanding or a control of nature beyond what was immediately useful.

    http://www.soundchristian.com/man/
    nigga please.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Synergy777 View Post
    africans were also in the americas, look at the olmec civilisation.

    the Olmec were NOT African.


    "The question (paraphrased to be succinct):
    Why is it racist to suggest that Africans voyaged to the New World
    in Pre-Columbian times and sculpted the Olmec Colossal Heads,
    especially when these naturalistic sculptures show very obviously
    negroid features?

    My response:
    Simply put, this suggestion is considered racist because it is
    claiming, without proper evidence, that great artworks ascribed
    to one group of people (Mesoamerican Native Americans) are actually
    the work of another people (Africans).

    In general, those who have insisted that the Olmec Heads have
    "negroid" features have not taken the time to look at the area's
    Native Americans and how their features correlate with the features
    shown on these sculptures; neither have they given much thought
    to the idea that the natives could have produced these artworks
    themselves."

    http://www.angelfire.com/zine/meso/meso/olmec.html

  15. #15
    DuncanHine Monument Cakes CEITEDMOFO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NEW JERUSALEM
    Age
    63
    Posts
    12,295
    Rep Power
    96

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WU-KILLAH View Post
    fortunately the greatest historians are on the internet to tell us the untold truth.

    Now we know blacks ruled Egypt, Europe, America, India, the Moon, Mars etc etc etc
    THIS IS WHY WE MUST LOVE OUR ROMAN CATHOLICS FOR BURNING UP ALL THESE BLACK PEOPLES HISTORY AND ANCHIENT ALCHEMY BOOKS FOR THE ROMAN GODS AND LUCIFER GOD

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •