01.01.2021
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Ancient African Kings Of India

  1. #16

    Default

    Interesting topic.

    Many older Masonic writings and some writings of White Lodge Adepts have some clues on this too.

    Godfrey Higgins, Manly P. Hall, H.P. Blavatsky, Gerald Massey, Samael Aun Weor, and some others.

  2. #17

    Default

    some of this stuff doesnt seem real... for one fact i know that ancient sanskrit was not created by Ethopians (Nagas). The Aryans (ppple of anicent Iran and Afghanistan) created Sanskrit and the Hindu caste system (better yet the basic foundation of the Hindu religion - thus a large part of Indian culture and society) when they conquered northern India - not the Ethopians. The Aryans created the caste system almost entirely and more or less indirectly determined by skin colour . Aryans being fair skinned ruled at top (along with the lighter skineed Indians that they could relate to better) and Indians (typically in the south with darker skin) were lower on the caste system. THiss was more or less one of the first systems of racisim, and it indirectly still lingers within the country of India.

    Now concerning Ethopians and their role in India..there is no doubt that they came there and dwelled there along time ago from their efficiently crafted boats. But they didnt experience such a good welcome as you stated .They didnt conquer the country n tahts definite... they had integreated into the society (but still held on to some of their East African culture & traditions). now also keep in mind they came in little #s like 2000-4000 max. so there is no way in hell that they could rule the entire sub continent (approx. what makes up South Asia today) They were known to have physically strong characteristics and to be good warriors. as a result they held high ranks in the ancient Indian military and most of the migrant Ethopians became fighters.

    Speaking bout today, you wouldnt reallly find an Ethopian living in India... they are definitely Indians with Ethopian roots, and there are some Indians (particualry in teh south) that are half Indian and half Ethopian. Most of the Ethopians over time married with the indigeanous Indians. The people that do got Ethopian roots tend to be very low on the caste system, and in impoverished neighbourhoods. the caste system still lives on today in India, it isnt emphasized nearly as much as before but its there, and due to the varying skin colours of Indian people it still harnesses some implications of racsism therefore all Ethopian related Indians are probably poor and uneducated.

    But theres no doubt that Ethopians played a significant role in India and some held high positions in vital areas of Indian society but the Aryans had a FARRR greater influence, or even the British colonists on South Asia.

  3. #18
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrEAM View Post
    some of this stuff doesnt seem real... for one fact i know that ancient sanskrit was not created by Ethopians (Nagas). The Aryans (ppple of anicent Iran and Afghanistan) created Sanskrit and the Hindu caste system (better yet the basic foundation of the Hindu religion - thus a large part of Indian culture and society) when they conquered northern India - not the Ethopians. The Aryans created the caste system almost entirely and more or less indirectly determined by skin colour . Aryans being fair skinned ruled at top (along with the lighter skineed Indians that they could relate to better) and Indians (typically in the south with darker skin) were lower on the caste system. THiss was more or less one of the first systems of racisim, and it indirectly still lingers within the country of India.

    Now concerning Ethopians and their role in India..there is no doubt that they came there and dwelled there along time ago from their efficiently crafted boats. But they didnt experience such a good welcome as you stated .They didnt conquer the country n tahts definite... they had integreated into the society (but still held on to some of their East African culture & traditions). now also keep in mind they came in little #s like 2000-4000 max. so there is no way in hell that they could rule the entire sub continent (approx. what makes up South Asia today) They were known to have physically strong characteristics and to be good warriors. as a result they held high ranks in the ancient Indian military and most of the migrant Ethopians became fighters.

    Speaking bout today, you wouldnt reallly find an Ethopian living in India... they are definitely Indians with Ethopian roots, and there are some Indians (particualry in teh south) that are half Indian and half Ethopian. Most of the Ethopians over time married with the indigeanous Indians. The people that do got Ethopian roots tend to be very low on the caste system, and in impoverished neighbourhoods. the caste system still lives on today in India, it isnt emphasized nearly as much as before but its there, and due to the varying skin colours of Indian people it still harnesses some implications of racsism therefore all Ethopian related Indians are probably poor and uneducated.

    But theres no doubt that Ethopians played a significant role in India and some held high positions in vital areas of Indian society but the Aryans had a FARRR greater influence, or even the British colonists on South Asia.
    Can you describe the phenotype of an Aryan?

  4. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Man View Post
    Can you describe the phenotype of an Aryan?
    yeah well first off just for clarification, the Aryans im talking about arent what you might have heard Hitler calling himself and other non-Jew Europeans/Caucasians (more specifically Germans) during the Nazi era in Germany. Im talkking about the true or originial Aryans of ancient times taht inhabitated most likely what makes up modern day Northern Iran and Afghanistan.

    To answer your question,
    they basically just shared the same physical characterisitics as other MIddle Easterns but they are definitely some distinguishing traits from other groups of people in the ancient ME.
    Also due to all the spreading and conquering of different races in different areas and mixing of pple this obviously effected the way they look.
    But to break it down simply
    Hair: dark brown to light brown and some blonde prolly in darker tones. hari texture was straight or wavy/curly most likely
    mostly medium of hazel brown eyes and/or soem grey or green or maybe blue (due to mixing with Europeans)
    scattered facial and body hair regular builts (varying from meso/endo/ecto-morph etc.)
    skin colour was more or less olive, light browns, etc. most typically they just prolly had same skin tone as the cilvaringz to the right of yo screen lol.

    uhh basiclaly they were Central Asian peoples (so just look at the people of Iran, Afghanistan, and Kazaksthan, Turmekistan or so mix em up into one type of person and you got the Aryans lol) thats teh best i can describe em. some historical records will tell you the Aryans were white people with blonde hair and blue eyes --- thats some bullshit.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •