Pink Floyd Vs. Led Zeppelin

[oDoUoSoKo]

i HATE these kinda threads, but your opinions make me laff, so lets see what u think when u put giant against giant.....hahaha.

[crust]

god damn it dusk! haha why do you make us do this! ahhhhhhh! well you're all gunna prolly hate me but ima have to go with some led zep. and don't get me wrong, pink is the shit. hella dope. but i just like led zep just a bit more. with songs like black dog and dazed and confused(among many others)i had to choose zep. this actually reminds me, i haven't heard money from pink ina while. i love that song.

[Sir Artsdradamus]

led zeppelin are the biggest rip off artists of all time....

listen to this interview from the howard stern show. it takes a few minutes until they get into it, but zepplin stole all of their songs from their first album.

http://www.esnips.com/doc/3a626981-0...n-Denny-Somach

[INF]

not only did they steal for the first album but the second as well and if they could have , the third. Jimmy page had it all planned out for tha first 4 albums when they got signed but it turned into something else.


I am gonna vote LZ cuz they got all kinds of moods and Pink Floyd never rocked it that hard. It always came back to soft melody's.

[brock]

Incredibly hard decision

[rainbow]

Pf

[benzo]

Zep fused too many elements together for PF to fuck with them. Yeah, they ripped off the old blues guys but still developed into one of the most creative bands EVER. Also, PF's live show is awesome based on the lasers, props, etc. but Zep was legendary for straight rocking the crowd for 3 hours +, included improv jams. Popular bands don't do that anymore...

[pneumatic]

Floyd blows em out the water.

[LuckyTheWonderDog]

Love em both. Completely different. No point actually answering the question.

All I will say is that my 2 favourite albums between the two are probably by Floyd, but Zeppelin had more consistancy overall across all their work.

[Jeru]

Led Zep

[Jeru]

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=5hdRXtjt6PA

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=biwUcQvAGQ0

That's not even the full version...wanna see that buy the dvd

[GhettoGnom]

Floyd.

[Visionz]

you might as well be comparing Mos Def and Johnny Cash

[oDoUoSoKo]

Love em both. Completely different. No point actually answering the question.

All I will say is that my 2 favourite albums between the two are probably by Floyd, but Zeppelin had more consistancy overall across all their work.

are u serious here? floyd had two if at all, ok albums...saucerful and atom heart mother....EVERYTHING ELSE is Consistency's beautiful sister.

opinion ofcourse, but either way...its comes down to this....are u lookin for a few rock hard records, or alot of smooth, strong records....?

[LuckyTheWonderDog]

^^ My opinions of their albums are as follows:

I really don't like the The Piper At The Gates Of Dawn with Syd Barrett, and the two you listed, plus More, Ummagumma, A Momentary Lapse Of Reason & The Division Bell aren't brilliant. The Final Cut is great in places, but a bit patchy.

Meddle, Obscured By Clouds, Animals & The Wall are all brilliant, and Dark Side Of The Moon & Wish You Were Here are two of my favourite albums of all time.

The first six Zeppelin albums to me are all 5* brilliant, and the last two are both pretty good.

That's why I felt Zep had it on consistancy, but Floyd had arguably my favourite works.