01.01.2021
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48

Thread: first reviews of 8 diagrams?....on a maxim mag

  1. #16
    Yacub grafted me froth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Orange Beach, AL
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,175
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 11th Chamber View Post
    Pitchfork gave Bobby Digital in Stereo a 2.9/10.......

    honest and credible? really?
    just stopped here bc that record is still a classic in my eyes esp towards the end bc nothing sounds like it

  2. #17
    Veteran Member GhettoGnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    norway
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,693
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    wait...wait... They reviewed 8 diagrams? That means that wu must have sent out promo albums.. That means that it's bound to get leaked within a month..

    right?


    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones
    I didn't like it because of the beats.

  3. #18
    aka PROFIT venex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Age
    35
    Posts
    5,040
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    ^^yeah, I was thinkin' the same...


    I don't give a damn if the review sucks... I just wanna read it..to know a bit more about the album
    Shaolin shadowboxin' and the wu-tang swordstyle...
    If what you say is true...
    The shaolin and the wu-tang could be dangerous!
    En garde, I'll let you try my wu-tang style...

  4. #19
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    godland
    Posts
    4,546
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    any mag that dissed Forever is not credible. and there were lots.
    Da Universal Magnetic Bitch Oppressor

    "Oppressing bitches individually and in groups since 1976"

  5. #20
    Suga Duga
    Guest

    Default

    another useless thread from the woulda/shoulda/coulda category - we haven't heard the album yet, so why discussing about the 3.5/5 rating?

    shut the fuck up and wait

  6. #21
    Veteran Member GhettoGnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    norway
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,693
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Anyone wanna scan this??

    (and btw, I meant week, not month.. In a month, the album is almost out ><)


    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones
    I didn't like it because of the beats.

  7. #22
    king disguised as beggar. the silencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    i roam the earth's surface
    Age
    38
    Posts
    6,753
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    if they would've gave it a great review i'd be worried...they appeal to fools

  8. #23
    Banned!!!11 Ghost_Deini_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    jersey
    Age
    34
    Posts
    898
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    i saw this. its stupid. they mention a couple songs and its like a couple sentences long. its nothing new.

  9. #24
    FRESH FISH
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    200
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SaqurakiHanamichi View Post
    fuk what just 1 person thinks about a album , what u hate is what i love and what i love is what u hate....
    you make less sense every. fucking. day.

  10. #25

    Default

    Rolling Stone and Pitchfork are easily the worst reviewers.

    Well, maybe not worst, but they're both so fucking biased that you know pitchfork will only give a good score to something that isn't on a major and that is largely unlistenable / obscure, and Rolling Stone CLEARLY get paid to give high reviews to certain artists. I mean, they gave the last Dylan record a 5, and there is no way in HELL that was a flawless record.

    People shouldn't just throw around flawless 5/5 scores like they mean nothing anymore, but that's just my opinion.

  11. #26
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    godland
    Posts
    4,546
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    yeah well, why don't you keep your opinion to yourself before i come over there and plug it into your ass-outlet.
    Da Universal Magnetic Bitch Oppressor

    "Oppressing bitches individually and in groups since 1976"

  12. #27
    PRODIGAL SUN
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,281
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    I'll tell you what Pitchfork is the worst site ever. They give tons of dope records that everybody loves shitty scores. I don't understand how they rate and shit besides I guess they don't like Hip Hop too much.

  13. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 11th Chamber View Post
    Pitchfork gave Bobby Digital in Stereo a 2.9/10.......

    honest and credible? really?
    i was just joking man.
    I wasn't being serious. I mean I read rolling stone and all, but the reviews they got mean nothing. pitchfork is a joke too.
    Last edited by bocs; 11-04-2007 at 03:58 PM.

  14. #29
    Veteran Member Emperor Les's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, USA.
    Posts
    4,742
    Rep Power
    36

    Default

    Do any of you out there actually hesitate to buy an album because of a negative review? Whether it be from a magazine, newspaper, internet, etc. ? Feel free to answer.

  15. #30

    Default

    I'd answer, but D.D. King might get mad

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •