Grown Folks Section

**Prolifical ENG** · 02-23-2009, 10:55 PM

Originally Posted by TAURO DA GRIM LATIN

Why don't you just boot out all the dead weight in the vatican and make that spot the place to be.

I wish I could but the concept of that is different. one reason why im still a little hesitant of going through with this idea because half of the vatican members are the "old folks" and it just splits it again. this place will be just for the forum...no name colors, fame, or re power or other priviliges so only the people that want to contribute will be in it....so people like b-rock dont have to be.

**Tage** · 02-23-2009, 11:33 PM

^yeah.... no name colours etc... would be good.

lets have it like the pre-crash days. shit will decent again...

**LORD NOSE** · 02-24-2009, 11:01 AM

how about some of the younger ones that been around for a long time but are mature, like kid sha ?

**Prolifical ENG** · 02-24-2009, 11:25 AM

Originally Posted by SUNNY WINTERS

how about some of the younger ones that been around for a long time but are mature, like kid sha ?

I dont know...what do you think? I was thinking make an exception for some vatican (kid sha is a vat) The younger members that have been around mostly got vat status due to maturity.

**TAURO** · 02-24-2009, 11:46 AM

^^Which again renders this whole idea pointless. Just get rid of the people that aren't living up to vatican status and we will have what we want.

**MsRzaRecTaH** · 02-24-2009, 11:57 AM

Originally Posted by Prolifical ENG

im going to try to get this place up and running. no name colors though...it will probably be around 20-30 members.

how many heads are there in the forum that are over 25 and active.

say ME!

-- me!

**Prolifical ENG** · 02-24-2009, 12:15 PM

Originally Posted by TAURO DA GRIM LATIN

^^Which again renders this whole idea pointless. Just get rid of the people that aren't living up to vatican status and we will have what we want.

Its tough the way we structured it to just drop people from vatican. Dropping the inactives are one thing but to decide who isnt living up to the status makes it hard...especially in the ousting thread people dont want to talk and its up to few to get their hands dirty.

Its hard for tomb to keep up with usergroup transactions with the other groups and for me and ben to queue the moves....busy for tomb this month not coming around but i am waiting for a few things.

Originally Posted by MsRzaRecTaH

how many heads are there in the forum that are over 25 and active.

say ME!

-- me!

I guessed that number.

**rainbow** · 02-24-2009, 01:01 PM

Sounds like a great idea.

But i say, take it one step further.

Ensure that these posters can only post in this sub forum, and don't inflict the rest of the site with there senile drivel.

**Tage** · 02-24-2009, 06:04 PM

define "grown folks"... ive been here since day 14... but maturity cannot be judged on this site... most people post for comedic purpose.

i say re-vert everyone back to the pre-crash days.

before style, skamp and tsa were here this site was decent. after them its just got retarded.

everyone should be vat apart from those 3. that would make it decent again.

**Killa BB** · 02-24-2009, 06:24 PM

Originally Posted by MsRzaRecTaH

how many heads are there in the forum that are over 25 and active.

say ME!

-- me!

I'd say "ME" but it would appear that I'm too new to get into the grown folks section... so... back to the regular folks' section it is!

**MsRzaRecTaH** · 02-25-2009, 11:41 AM

Prolifical and I are working on some ideas....... there are many things to take into consideration but changes will me made.. I hope..

**Dooch** · 02-25-2009, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by Pat Bateman

Sounds like a great idea.

But i say, take it one step further.

Ensure that these posters can only post in this sub forum, and don't inflict the rest of the site with there senile drivel.

you get more bitter by the post Sean