01.01.2021
Page 5 of 18 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 262

Thread: 2pac vs Lupe

  1. #61

    Default

    ^^^lol, he probably didn't read the original post

    and i swear i'm one of only about 10 people who post here that has reasoning skills beyond those of a 5 year old.

  2. #62
    Are U Watching Closely? 11th Chamber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    In Hell..
    Posts
    10,792
    Rep Power
    44

    Default

    lol at this even being a debate

    I mean holy shit just put the classic tracks these two have made next to each other and its ridiculous. Lupe is nice and all, but cmon....

    im staying away from this one, this shouldent have made it 4 pages long

  3. #63
    Non-Ignorants Poetic Wun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lamest City, Earth
    Posts
    2,222
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twiztid_wutang View Post
    How the hell are Lupe and Pac even comparable, Different styles, different eras of hip hop
    this post was ironic due to the poster... no disrespect tho.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dusk View Post
    i think the intent of the thread was to ask if 2pac is better lyrically, to which i again reply...no. point blank...fuck popularity and influence...Hitler was an influential writer...dont make him a better writer than, shit..Tom Clancy for example.
    lol@Clancy... but this kinda resurfaces the Meth/Budden beef... "METHS A LEGEND METHS A LEGEND METHS A LEGEND METHS A LEGEND METHS A LEGEND"
    so....

    Quote Originally Posted by Dusk View Post
    thats an opinion...but tons of peole cite that as an inspiration...just perhaps not u


    and people honestly needto fucking let go of thr fact that 2pac is a "legend" it makes me so fucking sick....granted, he was a great speaker, performer, and hell..even rapper...but now he has this armor on him because hes dead, and so many people consider him a legend, that one someone makes a thread about Lupe being a better lyricist than him.....everyone is forced to sway towards pac's favor...point is, straight up, Lupe is a better lyricist than pac was..period..and i dont necessarily mean content, but im not excluding that either.
    word up... although Pac could've been better till Suge brain washed him.. Conscious heads HAVE TO consider 2pacalypse a fuckin classic & Strictly was bangin too (save "I'll Get Around")... after that he turned into some homo thug instead of keepin with the message.

    Quote Originally Posted by SKAMPOE View Post
    for real cats that understand wat it is, pac was like the jesus christ of the rap game
    nigga nigga nigga *smh*... give respect where respect is due but c'mon... and don't say it's cause i can't relate cause it sure as fuck ain't that. lol that was kinda extreme... but your opinion

    Quote Originally Posted by Dusk View Post
    no ur thinking of the gangster rapper who wasnt ganster til after he started rapping...LMAO...exposed.
    lol

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandemic View Post
    i would say lupe's probably a better lyricist when it comes to wordplay, metaphors, and thematic songs where symbolism is used to represent an idea or used as an allegory...but 2pac made better songs, and actually made songs that could make you feel something.

    basically, lupe's more intellectual (in a superficial way, i haven't really heard him get socially conscious or political or whatever label you want to give the 'in the struggle-fuck the establishment' type rap) and technique driven, where pac's shit was more visceral, his technique, rhyme schemes, and extended metaphors weren't complex, but he knew how to play on people's emotions.

    i'm not a huge fan of either one, but i would have to give it to 2pac on versatility, charisma, and ability to make street people listen to 'conscious' rap where everyone after him has failed to do that and just preaches to the choir (college kids, conspiracy theorists, NOI and NGE types).

    they're really completely different types of mcs though. better comparison would be 2pac vs. Nas, they both walked that fine, often contradictory line between being street novelist and social commentator.
    this killed the thread to the T.

    imo... IMO.... as a lyricist Lupe has better word play and you can't deny that. he is socially conscious but that also (especially after the skateboard-gate) kills his realism as far as being ear to the streets type. his "personal" songs come off feeble. like he heard a story about a kid. but what he does with politics is off the charts:
    "Yes indeed, democracy's a flirt in a miniskirt trying to give a handjob to the desert till it squirt Texas tea, then they give a condom to Congress to stretch and siege."

    Pac... well i look at pac this way... there was Tupac & there was 2pac. there was that conscious nigga that you can compare to Lupe that was growing with food for thought and coulda been a healthy man that maybe MAYBE could've even J. Lennon'd the music industry with the right push but then he met Suge and transformed into 2PAC!!!! the nigga that was too cool to spell his own name right!!! too gangsta to think with more than 4 brain cells!!! too THUG LIFE to grow the fuck up!!! and too simple to not see what Suge was doing to him.

    what Tupac did wasn't "the government is foul! boo bush!" like lupe does, but he brought them down to his level and said look me in the face. it was nothing close to general & all the while callin out his own people too. that nigga i respect. that nigga i'm scared of.

    2pac was marketable and, while he did have skill, was just a raw type cat. yeah yeah yeah pac's a legend... but that legend was made of a man that had a brain just as you do. was that brain capable of the metaphor's Lupe has? no.

    And i know this gon get me hated on but without big, would pac have his stature? i'm not askin for a debate on big but who can say pac's fame and all that is ALL PAC??

    i'ma be the first to say i'ma fan of Lupe and Hate pac... i ain't tryin to look like i'm ouside the box cause i WAS ouside the box... till i heard them and decided who i was more interested in. that's how music works. but i don't like pac cause it gets old. i know that shit so i don't wanna hear that shit. i ain't guna knock on anybody that likes pac tho cause i know he had an influence and still does and he wasn't flat out retarded making D4L music... he made sense. Lupe is just more my style. i'm cool with a debate but just don't hate. ranting and raving won't change my opinion.

    i never completely tuned pac out... i always at least gave his albums a spin. i was just the east coast kid that came up on BIG, RED & Wu so i drift towards the east coast-ness. and it's been said but you can't compare the 2 really... it's like a paul wall/ pharoahe monch debate... they're just different and talkin about pac, especially round where i live now, is pointless. it's like talkin about the Cowboys... you can't help but want to but just don't do it.
    [rethinking hitting submit reply...]



  4. #64
    Veteran Member GhettoGnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    norway
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,693
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    2pac.

    Better voice, better delivery, more precise with his words & easily got the best body of work.

    I do prefer Lupe as a lyricist though.


    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones
    I didn't like it because of the beats.

  5. #65
    Gen Chat Bully Uncle Steezo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    5th Dimension
    Posts
    14,615
    Rep Power
    129

    Default

    the ridiculousness of the comparison....
    i can't even think of a wack pac song.

    i agree with everything pandemic said except the part about nobody after him getting "street people" to get conscious.

    he must have never heard of goodiemob or outkast.

  6. #66
    Gen Chat Bully Uncle Steezo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    5th Dimension
    Posts
    14,615
    Rep Power
    129

    Default

    let me comment on what dusk said about hitler/clancy.

    if the goal of writing is to convey thought and emotion in a way that moves the reader to think feel or act, then hitler would be the better writer.

    van goh's paintings are shitty from a technical perspective, but if you have ever looked up close at "starry night" you see the strokes almost tell a story. you get a sense of his emotional state when he painted it.

    a photorealistic painting lacks that emotional dimension. its devoid of the human element. perspective.

    pac had the ability to connect with people. and lets not get it twisted pac was one of the greatest lyricsts of all time. he just wasn't spitting some giant robot daydream raps which i guess dusk preferred.

    so wordsmithing is important but is it better than honest expression?

    thats a big hell no.

  7. #67
    sleepless in basedworld ALCATRAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,734
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poetic Wun
    and too simple to not see what Suge was doing to him.
    what is it exactly that suge was doing to him?

    Quote Originally Posted by Poetic Wun
    And i know this gon get me hated on but without big, would pac have his stature? i'm not askin for a debate on big but who can say pac's fame and all that is ALL PAC??
    you got this completely backwards ... 2pac was already well established in the game before biggie smalls came on the scene, both in the streets and in hollywood ... and I can say that all pac's fame came from pac because biggie smalls was just a minor figga compared to 2pac ... if it wasn't for 2pac, biggie smalls would've never been remembered by anyone outside of the hip hop world

    Quote Originally Posted by Poetic Wun
    after that he turned into some homo thug instead of keepin with the message
    homo thug? you mean the homo thug that shot two police officers and beat the charges, right? the same homo thug who put jacques agnant on blast even though he was heavily connected to jimmy henchmen? the same homo thug who exposed king tut and the black mafia for extorting money out of puffy and bad boy, a record label which the black mafia funded?

    i think its cool if you want to discuss pac as a lyricist, but its pretty clear that you know nothing about the man besides the things you've heard on vh1 behind the music and articles you've read in the source ... just stick to talking about his music, let the people who really know how the game went discuss his relationship with the streets, cuz i can already tell that's something you have absolutely no knowledge about

  8. #68
    frieza saga oDoUoSoKo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    CCCGTEHQ
    Posts
    18,447
    Rep Power
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Crow ESQ View Post
    let me comment on what dusk said about hitler/clancy.

    if the goal of writing is to convey thought and emotion in a way that moves the reader to think feel or act, then hitler would be the better writer.

    van goh's paintings are shitty from a technical perspective, but if you have ever looked up close at "starry night" you see the strokes almost tell a story. you get a sense of his emotional state when he painted it.

    a photorealistic painting lacks that emotional dimension. its devoid of the human element. perspective.

    pac had the ability to connect with people. and lets not get it twisted pac was one of the greatest lyricsts of all time. he just wasn't spitting some giant robot daydream raps which i guess dusk preferred.

    so wordsmithing is important but is it better than honest expression?

    thats a big hell no.
    its funny u say that, because i think Lupe is more comparible to Van Gogh. Think about it....and smh at people waltzin in to this thread sayin...."please...no comparison" etc....

  9. #69
    Non-Ignorants Poetic Wun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lamest City, Earth
    Posts
    2,222
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    @speakonitgod
    I know what im saying and almost everything pertained to his music. how did your 2nd to last paragraph? seemed to me it was defending his thugyness.

    if you wanna talk about social credibility then pac shuts the shit down. but it did not need to take pac being a thug to do what he did.
    I never said big was all big. I been rockin big since RTD as opposed to those that knew him for Mo Money but I ain't guna front like he'd still be as widely known without pac. and I know pac had a career beforehand, im not taking that away.

    so I am discussing the lyricist as hard as that may be without mentioning the man cause too many heads are too ignorant to differentiate between his legend status and his lyrical ability. my objective was to separate the 2 so as I may have come off like I didn't know what he really did it was cause it aint about what he really did. if you wanna make a 2pac Appreciation thread I have almost no doubt ill be agreeing with you on many of your points.



  10. #70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Crow ESQ View Post
    the ridiculousness of the comparison....
    i can't even think of a wack pac song.

    i agree with everything pandemic said except the part about nobody after him getting "street people" to get conscious.

    he must have never heard of goodiemob or outkast.
    well yeah, but goodie mob and outkast were part of pac's era though...if i recall (i was only 12 when pac died so i might be wrong) soul food and still standing dropped while pac was still alive.

    i meant artist who had their debuts after tupac died...i would consider kast and goodie mob contemporaries of tupac.
    Last edited by Dr. Simon Hurt; 08-01-2009 at 09:21 AM.

  11. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Age
    19
    Posts
    16,773
    Rep Power
    96

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dusk View Post
    the question is lyricist.
    No, the question was "how was 2pac better in anyway";

    Quote Originally Posted by The Grandmaster View Post
    exactly what i expected.

    I DEFY ONLY ONE POSTER TO EXPLAIN TO ME CLARLY HOW IS 2PAC BETTER THAN LUPE FIASCO IN ANY WAY.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pandemic View Post
    ^^^lol, he probably didn't read the original post

    and i swear i'm one of only about 10 people who post here that has reasoning skills beyond those of a 5 year old.
    You mean this post?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Grandmaster View Post
    I know most of yall r gonna say 2pac but just tell me exactly how is he better.
    I don't see lyricist, do you?
    Last edited by The Hound; 08-01-2009 at 09:28 AM.
    Posts by The Hound are signed TH.

    Quoting ≠ Agreement.

  12. #72

    Default

    about the technical/realistic vs. emotional perspective...van gogh still knew the rules of perspective and photorealism which was why he was successfully able to circumvent them...if you take classes in any artistic discipline one of the main things they'll stress to you is you need to know the rules in order to break them, which is why dali or picasso, or even a kandinsky were successfully able to do what they did. or even in terms of writing, i'm sure ee cummings could probably write conventional poetry or even prose with no problem, which was why the poetry can still break with convention and work.

    i've never read hitler or tom clancy so i can't speak on that comparison.

  13. #73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Energy Turtle View Post

    You mean this post?



    I don't see lyricist, do you?
    you got me on that one, i forgot about like 10 posts of polysyllabic bullshit before this one



    Quote Originally Posted by Dusk View Post
    i think the intent of the thread was to ask if 2pac is better lyrically, to which i again reply...no. point blank...fuck popularity and influence...Hitler was an influential writer...dont make him a better writer than, shit..Tom Clancy for example.
    I guess in my mind since this was the first post that made any sense I was considering it the first one lol

    but you're right.

  14. #74
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Age
    19
    Posts
    16,773
    Rep Power
    96

    Default

    ^^^lol, he probably didn't read the original post
    Posts by The Hound are signed TH.

    Quoting ≠ Agreement.

  15. #75
    Groovallegiance 5hundred&one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    2,426
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    I don't even level with people who argue lyricism in hip-hop. Like I could go in to the wu-chamber and say Ghostface is a better rapper than Gza and everyone would start getting upset.

    'But Gza was a better lyricist! lol!'

    Fuck that. Only herbs care so much about the complexity of a rappers lyrics and hip-hop wasn't built on herbs and what they have to say, period. Saying a rapper is a more 'complex lyricist' than another seems to me like a desperate reach to prove to people that the rapper you like the most is the better lyricist.

    Tupac wrote lyrics that resonated with more people in the hip-hop community than Lupe and it could be argued that his lyrics were just as good, even if they were a little less complex. Complicated lyrics aren't automatically good just because they're complicated.

    Ice Ice Baby had bigger words than Brooklyn Zoo, but which song do you think was iller lyrically?
    Last edited by 5hundred&one; 08-01-2009 at 11:18 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •