01.01.2021
Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 228

Thread: If you know your 9/11 Conspiracy shit

  1. #31

    Default

    No. Steel melts moron.

  2. #32
    DrunkenMasta303
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlamingPassport View Post
    "fires burned until they weakened the steel until it could no longer support the weight of the building above, and then the building collapsed."

    ^^

    Can anyone help me refute this?
    both towers crashed down in FREE-FALL speed, they didnt collapse, they got pulverized!


    btw,
    the fact that 'till this day (8 years later) NOBODY has seen any footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon is proof that 9-11 was an inside job. i mean why dont they just release any video of the many cameras (!) filming the scene? cos there was no plane

  3. #33

    Default

    I saw the video of the plane hitting the Pentagon. It just got released recently I think. They were just showing on the news on 9/11/09. You can clearly see the plane slam into the side of the Pentagon. Don't blink. The plane was traveling at about 600 miles per hour, and the view is limited, due to the camera being a security camera, and facing the building. It does exist though.

  4. #34
    DrunkenMasta303
    Guest

    Default

    i hope ur not talking about this shit here

    i dont see no plane there, show me a video

  5. #35

    Default

    They showed that one, and I thought they showed a still with the plane visible. What is that pic on the right? That could be what i remember seeing. It does appear to be a plane in that pic.

  6. #36
    DrunkenMasta303
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Embryonic Crusadah View Post
    What is that pic on the right?
    i dont know what it is, but i know that its certainly NOT a Boeing 757!

    lol dont underestimate the SIZE of a Boeing 757 (this is what it wouldve looked like)

  7. #37

    Default

    So you're sayin the plane was smaller than the size the government claims. So what about the people on flight 77. I don't think anyones ever heard from them. A bunch of people got on that plane and ceased to exist from that point on. The timing is way off on that video you posted most recently as well. The plane was moving WAY faster than that.

  8. #38
    anglophone rainbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    24,581
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlamingPassport View Post
    This is a great argument I'd love to use in that debate! Can you be more specific? I'm debating with people who slap down general statements like that and demand exact proof.

    Yes, how ridiculous for someone to demand exact proof.



  9. #39
    anglophone rainbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    24,581
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beautifulrock View Post
    Sure I have an explanation, structural steel in Bangkok = plastic.
    Brilliant explanation.

    Hey dude, quote Brock from the unofficial site of The Wu Tang Clan saying "structural steel in Bangkok = plastic." and then see if they have any smart alec responses.

    I think with the combined brain power of the guys you've got working for you over here, you could just have a win on your hands!



  10. #40
    DrunkenMasta303
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Embryonic Crusadah View Post
    So you're sayin the plane was smaller than the size the government claims.
    lol no, im saying they shot a missile into the pentagon (the part that was empty for renovation) from a military helicopter or a jet, and just claimed that a Boeing 757 hit the building

    as long as i havnt seen a clear video of a plane theres no reason to believe otherwise

  11. #41
    anglophone rainbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    24,581
    Rep Power
    119

    Default

    Perfectly acceptable leap from some terrible quality video footage to the asserted fact that the CIA (?) fired missiles from a series of helicopters at the Pentagon, somehow managing to cover this up, despite the fact that there were presumably 1000's of witnesses, not to mention many more 1000's involved in the planning of such an operation.

    "theres no reason to believe otherwise"


    You guys make it too easy for others to label you as nuts (except Eric).

    Sure, point out what you think is suspicious about the events which occurred on that day, but don't expect to be taken seriously when you take these huge leaps of faith based on nothing but your own paranoid delusions.



  12. #42
    DrunkenMasta303
    Guest

    Default

    HEHE whos paranoid? ppl are paranoid of terrorists, because they believe what theyve been told, me i only believe my own eyes, they dont lie, so no reason to be paranoid

    SHOW me the plane!

  13. #43
    Wu Vatican Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,890
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    ^ you're missing the point. You're saying that just because you yourself didn't actually see a plane hitting the building, that it must have been a missile fired from a helicopter organised by the US government


  14. #44
    The ABBOTT
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,633
    Rep Power
    47

    Default

    throw away your tvs and stop watching the news it is brainwashing you.



    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones View Post
    Food For Thought, i don't even pay you any attention because i know you're a retard.

  15. #45
    God's Replica Mumm Ra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Black Pyramid
    Age
    38
    Posts
    11,886
    Rep Power
    107

    Default

    hell naw i got a good deal on this hdtv! and i use it for games and porn!

    on the real tho - i have digital cable/ direct tv and ive used it once in about two months. i rarely ever watch tv.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •