They mos def were in the Caucasus, but they didn't invade no ancient Egypt or ancient India from there.except that they came from the caucus mountains . from that their is the detirioration of the civilizations from egypt to the indus valley in india.
The Greeks came a good amount of time AFTER the invasions that you allude to when you said "the detirioration of the civilizations from egypt to the indus valley".after which we get the greeks
And are you saying that the Greeks/Whites had to RECONQUER these same lands you mentioned? Because according to history it was ALEXANDER THE GREEK and them who conquered these lands and set off their rulership.
Aryans from the Mid-East?? Source?while in the indus valley the first caste system is started bu these 'aryans' from the mid-east.
Crusade implies HOLY WAR. What is your source that these supposed wars that you mention (Caucasians taking of Egypt and India) had a so-called religous purpose?the first crusades the taking of the cultures from egypt and indus valley.
See above.the second crusades the roman empire in their expansion
How can you mention Christians going against Muslims for Jerusalem, and not FIRST mention it was Muslims who FIRST went against Christians for the very same city?and assimilating of those they conquered. the third crusade the christians against the muslims for jerusalem.
Anyway, YES those wars (the major Crusades) had to do with caucasians, but NOT on the Christian side.
The Seljuk Turks were Caucasians. HahaFirst Crusade
Full article: First Crusade
After Byzantine emperor Alexius I called for help with defending his empire against the Seljuk Turks, in 1095 at the Council of Clermont Pope Urban II called upon all Christians to join a war against the Turks, a war which would count as full penance. Crusader armies marched to Jerusalem, sacking several cities on their way. In 1099, they took Jerusalem and massacred the population. As a result of the First Crusade, several small Crusader states were created, notably the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Following this crusade there was a second, unsuccessful wave of crusaders, the Crusade of 1101.
Certain whites did use the term, but that was later in history, and not during the time period you suggest. (which was the alleged Caucasians taking of Egypt and India, Greeks and Romans)each 'crusade' was not just a evolutionary step in the progress of his (white mans) means of civilization but was through the force of war upon those who resisted their culture and society and values it espoused.
Bookmarks