yep. the rich people only need to give away 50% of their property and money and the world would be saved in within 15years
50%
yep. the rich people only need to give away 50% of their property and money and the world would be saved in within 15years
Last edited by da kid toney; 05-14-2006 at 04:16 PM.
out of ice
how?
all the points have been made
put the cash together first
then make plans and organise- build upon the oldest religious scripts found on planet earth. ...
Last edited by da kid toney; 05-14-2006 at 04:15 PM.
out of ice
i am not at all suprised by this statement.
peace, love, revolution.
If that sort of cash was raised, people would inevitably line their pockets while 'overseeing' such plans come into action.
Chicks dig giant robots
yes. there gots to be a good leader
out of ice
communism...its where its at.
The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot.
People are too stupid to effectively conspire to do anything, but not too stupid to come up with conspiracy theories.
im gon keep this thread open
this can be the general chat section in KTL
dont tell the other moderators or else i might get blacklisted
all the points have been made
i'd say what's being alluded to in this thread is more anarchy.Originally Posted by whitey
peace, love, revolution.
no. itīs a fair system... like theone with the pope, but this leader donīt take money for "his vatican". instead he will reinvest every cent coming in... easy
out of ice
reinvest in what?
walmart stocks?
all the points have been made
hahaha.. no. give back to the streets. to the kids and youths.
build buildings in all the cities, where the young ones can go to and feel like home.
basicially. itīs not enough to take the money from the rich. famous musicians, singers and rappers must be involved... same story, different year
out of ice
Capitalism and most modern economic systems cannot exist without poor people. If they were to take 50% of rich peoples money and spread it evenly across the world, reconstructing buildings and getting rid of ghettos and poor people, our economy would collapse and there will be a depression.
Upper Class
Lower Class
The 2 coincide hand and hand, it's the only way we can live in a world where we place monetary value on things. If there isn't a need for money to acquire whatever you need than money is no longer as valuable as it was.
Money itself is the problem, not the lack of or excess of it.
Big Pimpin Power Ranger Slappin Hoes Since 1986
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks